09.09.2014 Views

Lataa ilmaiseksi

Lataa ilmaiseksi

Lataa ilmaiseksi

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

little in the interviewees’ comments suggested that the object in question had<br />

been adopted in order to impress others; often the interviewees did not have a<br />

clear motivation at all for adopting a particular design. Janne’s account in the<br />

2004 interview of what had happened to one of his favourite items provides a<br />

nice example of what I find problematic with the current research on products.<br />

In 2004, Janne talked about the Wirkkala plate that he owned with apparent<br />

pleasure and admiration. On the one hand, he liked its minimalist design, but<br />

he also was explicitly pleased that the item is rare and sought by collectors.<br />

That comment is one of the few in the data that made me think that one<br />

source of pleasure could be the rarity of an item, thus implying that status<br />

was one of the reasons that the item was appropriated for the home. However,<br />

neither his admiration of minimalism nor the rarity of the item prevented<br />

Janne from forgetting about the item once it had been put away. My point<br />

is that such forgetfulness is more of a rule than an exception: it is integral to<br />

our dealings with products and design that we most often do not even think<br />

about them.<br />

Ossi Naukkarinen, in his writings about the aesthetics of everyday life, provides<br />

a good but also rare example of a discussion about how people do not<br />

actively think about products. His discussion concerns appearance (Naukkarinen<br />

1998, 2000), and he outlines how it is characteristic of everyday aesthetics<br />

(as opposed to the aesthetics of the rare and exceptional, of which art is the<br />

most traditional topic) that we do not pay much attention to an item’s appearance<br />

and that often the aesthetics of personal appearance has become more a<br />

matter of routine, without people paying much attention to it at all. Billy Ehn<br />

and Orvar Löfgren (Ehn & Löfgren 2010) provide an illustrative example of<br />

this in their discussion about doing one’s make-up:<br />

6 D E S I G N L I M B O<br />

247<br />

One woman said that being asked to describe her morning makeup routine,<br />

which she said usually took ten to fifteen minutes, made her realise how little<br />

she usually reflects about it and its complexity. There are many details<br />

that have to be organised into order and rhythm: cleaning the face, putting<br />

on foundation, adding shadow to the eyelids, brushing the eyelashes, using<br />

a mascara pen for the eyebrows, and finally applying lipstick and rouge, to<br />

name a few of the basic details. The hands move fast and confidently among<br />

the heap of tools, containers, and other props in the cosmetic bag, searching<br />

for the right ingredients, colours, and mixes. “Even if I have done this a<br />

thousand times,” she said, “it still calls for concentration and a steady hand.”<br />

But this does not prevent her mind from wandering. Putting on makeup is<br />

for her a moment of daydreaming and planning.(Ehn & Löfgren 2010 96)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!