13.09.2014 Views

Conference Programme (PDF, 1019KB) - Trinity College Dublin

Conference Programme (PDF, 1019KB) - Trinity College Dublin

Conference Programme (PDF, 1019KB) - Trinity College Dublin

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

abstracts by stream and session<br />

Our results suggest that social trust is not stable thorough one’s life and that welfare design matters for people’s social trust. Overall, the<br />

social trust of immigrants’ descendant is closer to the social trust of natives than to the social trust of their parents. In addition, welfare<br />

spending, particularly spending in universal benefits is positively related to people’s social trust, regardless of their migratory status.<br />

This study adds to the existing literature in several ways: by exploring the impact of the welfare state in the social capital of immigrants in<br />

a comparative setting, by testing the cultural versus the institutional hypothesis on people’s social capital, and by including market<br />

characteristics in the conceptualization of the welfare state.<br />

SESSION 3g<br />

Occupational Incorporation of Immigrants in Western European Countries<br />

*Anastasia Gorodzeisky, Juan March Institute, Spain<br />

Moshe Semyonov, Tel-Aviv University, Israel<br />

The major goal of the present paper is to study patterns of occupational attainment and occupational incorporation of immigrants in<br />

Western European countries. Using data from the European Social Survey for 15 West European countries we examine the extent to which<br />

time spent in the host country, socio-demographic attributes, ethnicity and religious affiliation affect the integration of immigrants into<br />

the occupational system of the host country. The data analysis is performed separately for men and women. The analysis reveals similar<br />

patterns across the 15 countries. In general, occupational status of both immigrants and native born Europeans tends to increase with<br />

educational level, with age and with urban residence. It also tends to be higher among married men but not among married women. The<br />

analysis further reveals that immigrants, whether men or women, are disadvantaged in attainment of occupational positions as compared<br />

to the native populations but experience upward mobility with the passage of time in the host country. That is, the occupational status of<br />

immigrants, whether men or women, is lower than the occupational status of native born even after taking into consideration differences<br />

in socio-demographic attributes such as education and marital status. However, the occupational disadvantage of immigrants tends to be<br />

lower among second generation immigrants than among first generation immigrants and it tends to decline with passage of years in the<br />

host countries. Yet, some meaningful differences among sub-groups of immigrants are observed. Specifically, among men, immigrants of<br />

non-European origin and of the Muslim conviction remain occupationally disadvantaged even in the second generation despite<br />

considerable educational gains. Among women, , however, non-Europeans and Muslims are in fact advantaged in attainment of<br />

occupational status as compared to native born women; second generation non-Muslim and European immigrants although not<br />

advantaged in attainment of occupational status, are found to close the entire occupational status gap with native born European women.<br />

The findings and their meaning are evaluated and discussed in light of sociological theories of immigrant assimilation and ethnic<br />

inequality in society.<br />

Residential Segregation and Spatial Assimilation among Immigrants in European Societies<br />

Anya Glikman, Tel-Aviv University, Israel<br />

*Moshe Semyonov, Tel-Aviv University, Israel<br />

The influx of immigrants and labor migrants during the second half of the previous century had changed the ethnic fabric of many<br />

European cities. Currently, most West-European metropolitan centers are characterized by distinct-segregated ethnic neighborhoods.<br />

Whereas patterns of segregation and spatial assimilation have been studied extensively and for quite long time in American society, the<br />

body of research on immigrants' segregation and spatial assimilation in European societies is relatively new and small. The present<br />

research provides the first systematic examination of patterns of spatial segregation among immigrants across 13 European countries.<br />

Using data from the 2003 European Social Survey we examine the extent to which patterns of residential segregation and spatial<br />

assimilation are influenced by immigrants' tenure in the host country, socio economic characteristics, preferences for residential location,<br />

and ethnic and cultural origin. Ordinal-logit analysis reveals that ethnic residential segregation is quite prevalent in Western Europe.<br />

Although immigrants go through a process of spatial assimilation due to acculturation and economic mobility, the patterns vary<br />

considerably across ethnic and cultural groups. Specifically, rate of residential assimilation among immigrants from Asian or African<br />

countries is considerably lower than that among immigrants from European countries. Likewise, Muslims are more spatially segregated<br />

than other immigrants. While preferences for residential location and perceived discrimination cannot account for residential segregation<br />

among Asian immigrants, high rates of residential segregation and low rates of spatial assimilation among Muslims and African<br />

immigrants could be attributed to their relatively greater preference to reside in ethnic neighborhoods and to their perception of<br />

discrimination.<br />

The socio-economic integration of second-generation minority ethnic groups in Great Britain and the USA (1990-2000)<br />

Yaojun Li, The University of Manchester, UK<br />

Both Britain and the USA have seen large influxes of non-white immigrants in the large fifty years and an increasing proportion of the<br />

populations in both countries are the second-generation who have come of age and are active in the labour market. How well the ‘new<br />

second generation’ do in their educational and occupational attainment will have an enormous impact on the social integration and the<br />

democratic processes of the two countries.<br />

There are long-standing debates on the social fluidity of the British and the American social structure (the British sclerosis versus<br />

American Exceptionalism) and on the trajectories of the second-generational socio-economic integration (the straight-line versus the<br />

segmented assimilation theories). Although some studies have been carried out on social mobility in the two countries (Erikson and<br />

84

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!