03.10.2014 Views

FIRE DESIGN OF STEEL MEMBERS - Civil and Natural Resources ...

FIRE DESIGN OF STEEL MEMBERS - Civil and Natural Resources ...

FIRE DESIGN OF STEEL MEMBERS - Civil and Natural Resources ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

As can be seen from Figure 5.4 a-c, the line resulting from this formula fits well<br />

with the spreadsheet curve on each graph. The temperature range that this<br />

equation is valid for is from 400 °C to 600 °C but the upper limit of this could be<br />

extended to 800 °C from the evidence seen here. The lower limit could also be<br />

extended beyond the range suggested, to around 300 °C, although linear<br />

interpolation for temperatures below 400 °C from a starting temperature of 20 °C<br />

as is recommended with the formulas from NZS 3404 would be a better option.<br />

The ECCS formula for the light steel beam appears to have good correlation with<br />

the spreadsheet curve even though the beam size has a section factor outside of the<br />

recommended range. For unprotected steel this light beam gave results that did not<br />

fit with the SAFIR curves for four sided exposure, see Section 0, although for three<br />

sided exposure for unprotected beams the results fit well.<br />

There appears to be little difference in the accuracy of the formula between the<br />

three beam sizes used here, <strong>and</strong> the formula appears to give a very accurate<br />

estimation of the temperature of the steel during the temperature range of 350 °C<br />

to 800 °C. Again the SAFIR curves are used to compare the accuracy of the<br />

formulas as this programme shows the thermal response of steel to great accuracy.<br />

Using the modified ECCS equation gives excellent results when compared with the<br />

results from the SAFIR programme. Purkiss’ simplified version of the modified<br />

equation also gives good accuracy, but the assumption that the specific heat of the<br />

insulation is twice that of steel is a bit non conservative, as the specific heat values<br />

for heavy insulation can vary significantly.<br />

5.3 RESULTS FOR FOUR SIDED EXPOSURE WITH LIGHT<br />

PROTECTION:<br />

The same comparisons that are made with heavy protection are applied in this<br />

section to examine the effect of the simplifications <strong>and</strong> assumptions made with<br />

light protection. The insulation used to model the effect of light protection is<br />

M<strong>and</strong>olite, by Firepro. The properties of this are as below:<br />

91

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!