- Page 1 and 2:
Fire Design of Steel Members K R Le
- Page 4:
ABSTRACT: The New Zealand Steel Cod
- Page 8 and 9:
TABLE OF CONTENTS: ABSTRACT:.......
- Page 10 and 11:
5.4 RESULTS FOR FOUR SIDED EXPOSURE
- Page 12 and 13:
LIST OF FIGURES: FIGURE 1.1: VARIAT
- Page 14: FIGURE 5.11: TEMPERATURE CONTOUR LI
- Page 17 and 18: designed with confidence. Full scal
- Page 19 and 20: eams and struts when subjected to a
- Page 21 and 22: Gilvery and Dexter, (1997), prepare
- Page 23 and 24: with conditions specified to ensure
- Page 25 and 26: 1.6 BACKGROUND INFORMATION: 1.6.1 F
- Page 27 and 28: experienced in fire situations, but
- Page 29 and 30: The thermal conductivity is not imp
- Page 31 and 32: [ The heated perimeter of the steel
- Page 33 and 34: The advantages of board systems are
- Page 35 and 36: The values for the thermal properti
- Page 37 and 38: insulation has on the rise of the s
- Page 39 and 40: ( T − T ) k H p f s ∆t ∆T
- Page 41 and 42: spreadsheet method very closely, wi
- Page 43 and 44: protection, and for user defined fi
- Page 45 and 46: This equation originates from the y
- Page 47 and 48: 1400 1200 1000 800 600 400 200 0 0.
- Page 49 and 50: time. The value of the wall lining
- Page 51 and 52: The Eurocode does not define a meth
- Page 53 and 54: f f y y ( T ) (20) = 1.0 0 < T < 21
- Page 55 and 56: temperature is chosen because it is
- Page 57 and 58: The variation of yield stress data
- Page 59 and 60: 15 m -1 < H p /A < 275 m -1 in NZS
- Page 61 and 62: = H p A (m -1 ) 7.85 The cons
- Page 63: Connections: NZS 3404 requires that
- Page 67 and 68: Three beam sizes have been consider
- Page 69 and 70: 4.2 RESULTS FOR FOUR SIDED EXPOSURE
- Page 71 and 72: temperature is 360 °C. This result
- Page 73 and 74: 1000 Temperature ( o C) 800 600 400
- Page 75 and 76: the test. This formula has a limit
- Page 77 and 78: Equation 4.1 from NZS 3404 is much
- Page 79 and 80: Concrete slab Steel UB beam Figure
- Page 81 and 82: The results found from the SAFIR si
- Page 83 and 84: 1000 800 Temperature ( o C) 600 400
- Page 85 and 86: From Figure 4.11 a-c, the spreadshe
- Page 87 and 88: The SAFIR curves are the result of
- Page 89 and 90: The temperature range that equation
- Page 91 and 92: Figure 4.13 shows that using the sa
- Page 93 and 94: When comparing Firecalc and the Spr
- Page 95 and 96: three sided exposure with a slab pr
- Page 97 and 98: unprotected steel. The thermal prop
- Page 99 and 100: than elsewhere, and more insulation
- Page 101 and 102: Temp ( o C) 800 700 600 500 400 300
- Page 103 and 104: thicker beams have not yet reached
- Page 105 and 106: 1000 Temperature ( o C) 800 600 400
- Page 107 and 108: Mandolite by Firepro Safety Ltd Spe
- Page 109 and 110: 1200 Temperature ( o C) 1000 800 60
- Page 111 and 112: above the SAFIR curve. The maximum
- Page 113 and 114: Temperature ( o C) 1200 1000 800 60
- Page 115 and 116:
5.4.1 Steel Beams with Box Protecti
- Page 117 and 118:
The spreadsheet method gives temper
- Page 119 and 120:
The time-temperature curve of the s
- Page 121 and 122:
From Figure 5.10 a-c, the ECCS equa
- Page 123 and 124:
steel interface even though the tem
- Page 125 and 126:
The spreadsheet results are from ca
- Page 127 and 128:
1000 Temperature ( o C) 800 600 400
- Page 129 and 130:
The properties of the protection ap
- Page 131 and 132:
experimental tests. The formula giv
- Page 133 and 134:
6.2.2 Assumptions: When using the E
- Page 135 and 136:
This time-temperature curve shows t
- Page 137 and 138:
Protected steel exposed to the Euro
- Page 139 and 140:
6.3.1 Unprotected Steel: The experi
- Page 141 and 142:
the lower flange and web tend to th
- Page 143 and 144:
The fire data entered into the SAFI
- Page 145 and 146:
strength design actions are modifie
- Page 147 and 148:
carried out. Here the design action
- Page 149 and 150:
Alternatively, for a conservative e
- Page 151 and 152:
factor for lateral torsional buckli
- Page 153 and 154:
The variation of the mechanical pro
- Page 155 and 156:
This Annex makes a distinction betw
- Page 158 and 159:
8 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS:
- Page 160 and 161:
9 NOMENCLATURE: When equations are
- Page 162 and 163:
10 REFERENCES: Anchor, R.D., Malhot
- Page 164 and 165:
Harmathy, T.Z.,1993. Fire Design an
- Page 166:
Thomas. G.C. 1997. Fire Resistance
- Page 169 and 170:
Below is an example of a spreadshee
- Page 171 and 172:
SAFIR INPUT *.dat file developed by
- Page 173 and 174:
NODE 50 0.173 0.0427 NODE 51 0.173
- Page 175 and 176:
DIAMOND OUTPUT From the Diamond out