FIRE DESIGN OF STEEL MEMBERS - Civil and Natural Resources ...
FIRE DESIGN OF STEEL MEMBERS - Civil and Natural Resources ...
FIRE DESIGN OF STEEL MEMBERS - Civil and Natural Resources ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
5.8 CONCLUSIONS:<br />
The thermal behaviour of protected steel members has been examined in this<br />
section. In the New Zeal<strong>and</strong> code at present there are no formulas available to aid<br />
designers in the estimation of the temperature of protected steel members. The<br />
equations recommended by ECCS relate closely to the results found from the<br />
spreadsheet method <strong>and</strong> SAFIR.<br />
The empirical equations used in this section from ECCS give good results when<br />
compared with the time-temperature curves resulting from SAFIR simulations. As<br />
in Section 4, the upper temperature limit can be increased to allow more use to be<br />
made of these equations. The upper temperature value for protected steel can be<br />
increased to 800 °C <strong>and</strong> remain within the same accuracy as the line within the<br />
present temperature range criterion. The other limitations imposed on the steel<br />
member regarding the time <strong>and</strong> beam sizes for which the equation is valid do not<br />
seem to be a factor in the accuracy of the equations. The limitation regarding the<br />
thickness <strong>and</strong> thermal conductivity of the insulation has not been discussed<br />
because all tests examined in this report have complied with the range suggested<br />
for the equations.<br />
The original form of the equation is intended for use of steel beams protected with<br />
‘light’ insulation, but for ‘heavy’ insulation there is a modified formula, which<br />
accounts for the thermal capacity of the insulation. This formula only applies well<br />
for four sided exposure with protected members, <strong>and</strong> although the equation<br />
compares well with results from the spreadsheet method for three sided exposure,<br />
this is rather conservative as the spreadsheet method assumes a smaller amount of<br />
protection applied with its smaller section factor. When considered that most three<br />
sided exposure results from conditions with a concrete slab overlaying a steel<br />
beam, this equation gives a time-temperature relationship which is high for three<br />
sided exposure.<br />
The formula does works well for four sided exposure <strong>and</strong> is a useful tool <strong>and</strong> a<br />
simple alternative to the present guide in the New Zeal<strong>and</strong> code to use data from<br />
115