- Page 1: Fire Design of Steel Members K R Le
- Page 6: ACKNOWLEDGMENTS: Throughout my time
- Page 9 and 10: 3.1.1 Determination of Period of St
- Page 11 and 12: 8.4 FURTHER RESEARCH: .............
- Page 13 and 14: FIGURE 4.9: LOCATION OF MAXIMUM AND
- Page 16 and 17: 1 INTRODUCTION: 1.1 OBJECTIVES: The
- Page 18 and 19: as well with the experimental data.
- Page 20 and 21: and that the effect of slab-beam in
- Page 22 and 23: Results from experimental tests sho
- Page 24 and 25: 1.5.2 AS 4100:1990 The Australian S
- Page 26 and 27: place when higher temperature ‘po
- Page 28 and 29: Sp. Heat (J/kg K) 2000 1600 1200 80
- Page 30 and 31: where the temperature of the steel,
- Page 32 and 33: 1.6.4 Methods of steel protection:
- Page 34 and 35: 2 FIRES AND THERMAL ANALYSIS COMPUT
- Page 36 and 37: ρ s is the density of steel (kg/m
- Page 38 and 39: If the above equation is true then
- Page 40 and 41: ∆T s ki = dics p s H p A
- Page 42 and 43: capabilities has been limited to th
- Page 44 and 45: esponse times of sprinklers or smok
- Page 46 and 47: can be compared to other building p
- Page 48 and 49: t d 0.00013et = A v H v A t w
- Page 50 and 51: 3 FIRE SECTION OF THE STEEL CODES:
- Page 52 and 53:
elasticity with temperatures as giv
- Page 54 and 55:
adjust for this underestimate of st
- Page 56 and 57:
Figure 3.4: Stress strain curves wi
- Page 58 and 59:
1 T s, cr = 39.19ln −1 + 482 3.
- Page 60 and 61:
can be obtained from either a singl
- Page 62 and 63:
e) The conditions of support are th
- Page 64:
The Eurocode 3 Document and the Bri
- Page 67 and 68:
Three beam sizes have been consider
- Page 69 and 70:
4.2 RESULTS FOR FOUR SIDED EXPOSURE
- Page 71 and 72:
temperature is 360 °C. This result
- Page 73 and 74:
1000 Temperature ( o C) 800 600 400
- Page 75 and 76:
the test. This formula has a limit
- Page 77 and 78:
Equation 4.1 from NZS 3404 is much
- Page 79 and 80:
Concrete slab Steel UB beam Figure
- Page 81 and 82:
The results found from the SAFIR si
- Page 83 and 84:
1000 800 Temperature ( o C) 600 400
- Page 85 and 86:
From Figure 4.11 a-c, the spreadshe
- Page 87 and 88:
The SAFIR curves are the result of
- Page 89 and 90:
The temperature range that equation
- Page 91 and 92:
Figure 4.13 shows that using the sa
- Page 93 and 94:
When comparing Firecalc and the Spr
- Page 95 and 96:
three sided exposure with a slab pr
- Page 97 and 98:
unprotected steel. The thermal prop
- Page 99 and 100:
than elsewhere, and more insulation
- Page 101 and 102:
Temp ( o C) 800 700 600 500 400 300
- Page 103 and 104:
thicker beams have not yet reached
- Page 105 and 106:
1000 Temperature ( o C) 800 600 400
- Page 107 and 108:
Mandolite by Firepro Safety Ltd Spe
- Page 109 and 110:
1200 Temperature ( o C) 1000 800 60
- Page 111 and 112:
above the SAFIR curve. The maximum
- Page 113 and 114:
Temperature ( o C) 1200 1000 800 60
- Page 115 and 116:
5.4.1 Steel Beams with Box Protecti
- Page 117 and 118:
The spreadsheet method gives temper
- Page 119 and 120:
The time-temperature curve of the s
- Page 121 and 122:
From Figure 5.10 a-c, the ECCS equa
- Page 123 and 124:
steel interface even though the tem
- Page 125 and 126:
The spreadsheet results are from ca
- Page 127 and 128:
1000 Temperature ( o C) 800 600 400
- Page 129 and 130:
The properties of the protection ap
- Page 131 and 132:
experimental tests. The formula giv
- Page 133 and 134:
6.2.2 Assumptions: When using the E
- Page 135 and 136:
This time-temperature curve shows t
- Page 137 and 138:
Protected steel exposed to the Euro
- Page 139 and 140:
6.3.1 Unprotected Steel: The experi
- Page 141 and 142:
the lower flange and web tend to th
- Page 143 and 144:
The fire data entered into the SAFI
- Page 145 and 146:
strength design actions are modifie
- Page 147 and 148:
carried out. Here the design action
- Page 149 and 150:
Alternatively, for a conservative e
- Page 151 and 152:
factor for lateral torsional buckli
- Page 153 and 154:
The variation of the mechanical pro
- Page 155 and 156:
This Annex makes a distinction betw
- Page 158 and 159:
8 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS:
- Page 160 and 161:
9 NOMENCLATURE: When equations are
- Page 162 and 163:
10 REFERENCES: Anchor, R.D., Malhot
- Page 164 and 165:
Harmathy, T.Z.,1993. Fire Design an
- Page 166:
Thomas. G.C. 1997. Fire Resistance
- Page 169 and 170:
Below is an example of a spreadshee
- Page 171 and 172:
SAFIR INPUT *.dat file developed by
- Page 173 and 174:
NODE 50 0.173 0.0427 NODE 51 0.173
- Page 175 and 176:
DIAMOND OUTPUT From the Diamond out