03.10.2014 Views

FIRE DESIGN OF STEEL MEMBERS - Civil and Natural Resources ...

FIRE DESIGN OF STEEL MEMBERS - Civil and Natural Resources ...

FIRE DESIGN OF STEEL MEMBERS - Civil and Natural Resources ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

The temperature range that equation 4.3 is valid for is non conservative, when<br />

comparing the line with the time temperature curve from SAFIR 1. Neglecting the<br />

results from Figure 4.12 a, due to the section factor for this beam size being out of<br />

range, the upper limit for the temperature based on the results of Figure 4.12 b <strong>and</strong><br />

c, should be closer to 750 °C than the present 850 °C in the New Zeal<strong>and</strong> Steel<br />

Code. This is the upper temperature limit in the Australian Code. The ECCS<br />

equation temperature limitations could be modified, by increasing the upper limit,<br />

but by a lesser amount than suggested for four sided exposure in Section 0. The<br />

temperature range for equation 4.2 could be raised to at least 700 °C for three sided<br />

exposure, with a linear interpolation region added to the method here for<br />

temperatures below 400 °C.<br />

Since the formula for equation 4.3 is modified for three sided exposure from<br />

equation 4.1, the line from equation 4.3 fits better with the SAFIR 2 curve with a<br />

slab. This is because the data that the line is formulated to fit to is from results of<br />

three sided exposure with a slab present, from British Steel Institute tests, SNZ,<br />

(1997).<br />

Equation 4.3, therefore, appears to give a more realistic prediction of the average<br />

temperature of steel beams with three sided exposure, but again equation 4.2 is<br />

more conservative, by giving higher temperatures. The designer may wish to<br />

choose a more economical design by using the estimations of the NZS formulas,<br />

but the factor of safety in design is less than when using alternative methods of<br />

temperature estimation.<br />

Although the average temperature of steel beams is best predicted by equation 4.3,<br />

the ECCS formula, equation 4.2, gives a temperature estimation closer to the<br />

maximum likely temperature that will be reached in the steel, which is unaffected<br />

by fire exposure conditions, see Section Figure 4.10. Using the maximum<br />

temperature instead of the average temperature for three sided exposure is more<br />

conservative, as it gives higher temperatures <strong>and</strong> will give a more likely failure<br />

time for simply supported members. The temperature of the steel section is<br />

74

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!