23.10.2014 Views

ANNEX II - UNOPS

ANNEX II - UNOPS

ANNEX II - UNOPS

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

11.1.6 In recognition of the fact that progressive, relevant work experience may render a candidate equally<br />

qualified as someone with a higher education but less experience – and vice versa – the below table<br />

gives an overview of how work experience and education level requirements can substitute for each<br />

other.<br />

Table 6: Education / Experience Requirements<br />

Level<br />

PhD<br />

+ years of relevant<br />

work experience<br />

Masters degree<br />

+ years of relevant<br />

work experience<br />

Bachelor degree<br />

+ years of relevant<br />

work experience<br />

No university degree<br />

+ years of relevant<br />

work experience<br />

IC-A 0 years 0-4 years 2-6 years 5-9 years<br />

IC-B 0-5 years 5-10 years 7-12 years 10-15 years<br />

IC-C 6-9 years 11-14 years 13-16 years 16-19 years<br />

IC-D 10 years plus 15 years plus 17 years plus 20 years plus<br />

11.1.7 Notwithstanding paragraph 11.1.6, it is important to note that the standard for a specialist level<br />

Contractor is a master’s degree requirement. Positions for which a degree below masters is<br />

considered acceptable shall be specifically described as such in the TOR in order to comply with the<br />

requirements of a truly competitive selection process.<br />

11.2 Fee Setting for ICs<br />

11.2.1 The fee setting for ICs is a three-step process, where:<br />

(i) the first step is to determine a base fee, taking into account fixed criteria such as the<br />

Contractor’s level and duty station specific criteria (for details please see 11.2.2 below);<br />

(ii) the second step is to take into account any additional factors that are relevant for determining a<br />

reasonable fee in accordance with paragraphs 11.0.1 and 11.0.2 (for details please see 11.2.3<br />

below), and<br />

(iii) the third step is to reward the Contractor’s relevant education and work experience in excess of<br />

the required minimum for the position (for details please see 11.2.4 below).<br />

In many cases, upon allocation of points under step one, the base fee may already found adequate. If<br />

not, the second step in the fee setting methodology may be applied to consider additional elements in<br />

the fee setting.<br />

The points in step 3 may be allocated at the discretion of the <strong>UNOPS</strong> Hiring Unit upon selection of<br />

the Contractor, only if found relevant and necessary.<br />

When points have been allocated in step one – and possibly in steps 2 and 3 – the total number of<br />

points will indicate whether the fee shall be in the low, mid or high end of the relevant IC Fee Range.<br />

Table 7: IC Ranges – Breakdown into bands<br />

IC Level and Fee<br />

Range in USD<br />

IC-A<br />

4,000 – 8,000<br />

IC-B<br />

6,000 – 12,000<br />

IC-C<br />

9,000 – 18,000<br />

IC-D<br />

13,500 – 27,000<br />

Band<br />

Low<br />

High<br />

Low<br />

Mid<br />

High<br />

Low<br />

Mid<br />

High<br />

Low<br />

Mid Low<br />

Mid High<br />

High<br />

Daily Fees in<br />

USD<br />

200 – 300<br />

300 – 400<br />

300 – 400<br />

400 – 500<br />

500 – 600<br />

450 – 600<br />

600 – 750<br />

750 – 900<br />

675 – 825<br />

825 – 1,000<br />

1,000 – 1,150<br />

1,150 – 1,350<br />

Monthly Fees in<br />

USD<br />

4,000 – 6,000<br />

6,000 – 8,000<br />

6,000 – 8,000<br />

8,000 – 10,000<br />

10,000 – 12,000<br />

9,000 – 12,000<br />

12,000 – 15,000<br />

15,000 – 18,000<br />

13,500 – 16,500<br />

16,500 – 20,000<br />

20,000 – 23,000<br />

23,000 – 27,000<br />

Number of<br />

points<br />

0 – 50<br />

51 – 100<br />

0 – 33<br />

34 – 66<br />

67 – 100<br />

0 – 33<br />

34 – 66<br />

67 – 100<br />

0 – 25<br />

26 – 50<br />

51 – 75<br />

76 - 100<br />

Page 34 of 61

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!