25.10.2014 Views

jp8589 WRI.qxd - World Resources Institute

jp8589 WRI.qxd - World Resources Institute

jp8589 WRI.qxd - World Resources Institute

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

WORLD RESOURCES 2005<br />

also common in forests, such as India’s Joint Forestry<br />

Management agreements, where communities are granted<br />

limited management and use rights on state forest lands. The<br />

challenge for co-management regimes is to assure that the<br />

state cedes sufficient rights and authority to local communities<br />

but does not abandon them, leaving the communities<br />

without proper support.<br />

5. Accounting for the scale challenge. Inherent in the<br />

management of ecosystems is the problem of scale.<br />

Ecosystems can exist simultaneously at different scales, from<br />

a forest block in a single watershed to interconnected forest<br />

tracts extending a thousand kilometers. Sustaining ecosystems<br />

requires keeping in mind the interconnections between<br />

these scales, from micro to macro. Forest management<br />

in one community’s watershed may affect downstream<br />

communities and adjacent forests. Local communities<br />

cannot be expected to manage well at this macroscale, and<br />

thus the state retains an essential role here. This means<br />

helping to coordinate management plans in adjacent<br />

communities—and across the nation—so that they do<br />

not conflict or overemphasize a single kind of use<br />

(Shyamsundar et al. 2004:20). The state also has an<br />

oversight responsibility to make sure that local management<br />

aligns with national environmental laws, and even with<br />

international treaties such as the Convention on<br />

International Trade in Endangered Species (CITES).<br />

6. Monitoring and enforcement. Good ecosystem management<br />

relies on keeping harvest activities, tourist use, or<br />

other impacts within the ecosystem’s tolerances. This in<br />

turn demands an attempt to monitor the state of the ecosystem<br />

or the intensity of the impacts so that management<br />

decisions can reflect conditions on the ground. It also<br />

demands enforcement of the community’s harvest or use<br />

rules and the prevention of illegal logging, fishing, or other<br />

encroachment on the resource. Communities can often<br />

develop monitoring and enforcement capabilities, and, in<br />

fact, this is one area of group participation that can become<br />

a source of empowerment, as community members develop<br />

scientific skills or volunteer as forest guards or game<br />

wardens. But for transboundary monitoring or enforcement<br />

96

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!