jp8589 WRI.qxd - World Resources Institute
jp8589 WRI.qxd - World Resources Institute
jp8589 WRI.qxd - World Resources Institute
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
WORLD RESOURCES 2005<br />
also common in forests, such as India’s Joint Forestry<br />
Management agreements, where communities are granted<br />
limited management and use rights on state forest lands. The<br />
challenge for co-management regimes is to assure that the<br />
state cedes sufficient rights and authority to local communities<br />
but does not abandon them, leaving the communities<br />
without proper support.<br />
5. Accounting for the scale challenge. Inherent in the<br />
management of ecosystems is the problem of scale.<br />
Ecosystems can exist simultaneously at different scales, from<br />
a forest block in a single watershed to interconnected forest<br />
tracts extending a thousand kilometers. Sustaining ecosystems<br />
requires keeping in mind the interconnections between<br />
these scales, from micro to macro. Forest management<br />
in one community’s watershed may affect downstream<br />
communities and adjacent forests. Local communities<br />
cannot be expected to manage well at this macroscale, and<br />
thus the state retains an essential role here. This means<br />
helping to coordinate management plans in adjacent<br />
communities—and across the nation—so that they do<br />
not conflict or overemphasize a single kind of use<br />
(Shyamsundar et al. 2004:20). The state also has an<br />
oversight responsibility to make sure that local management<br />
aligns with national environmental laws, and even with<br />
international treaties such as the Convention on<br />
International Trade in Endangered Species (CITES).<br />
6. Monitoring and enforcement. Good ecosystem management<br />
relies on keeping harvest activities, tourist use, or<br />
other impacts within the ecosystem’s tolerances. This in<br />
turn demands an attempt to monitor the state of the ecosystem<br />
or the intensity of the impacts so that management<br />
decisions can reflect conditions on the ground. It also<br />
demands enforcement of the community’s harvest or use<br />
rules and the prevention of illegal logging, fishing, or other<br />
encroachment on the resource. Communities can often<br />
develop monitoring and enforcement capabilities, and, in<br />
fact, this is one area of group participation that can become<br />
a source of empowerment, as community members develop<br />
scientific skills or volunteer as forest guards or game<br />
wardens. But for transboundary monitoring or enforcement<br />
96