jp8589 WRI.qxd - World Resources Institute

REFERENCES
■ Ribot, J. 1998. “Theorizing Access: Forest Profits Along Senegal’s Charcoal Commodity
Chain.” Development and Change (29):307-341.
■ Riddell, J. 2000. Contemporary Thinking on Land Reform. SD-Dimensions. Rome: Food
and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Online at http://www.caledonia.org
.uk/land/fao.htm.
■ Rodriguez, C. 2004. “The Environmental Services Payment Program: An Alternative to
Financial Sustainability for Sustainable Development.” PowerPoint Presentation. Costa
Rica Ministry of Environment and Energy.
■ Rosa, H., S. Kandel, and L. Dimas. 2003. Compensation for Environmental Services and
Rural Communities: Lessons from the Americas and Key Issues for Strengthening
Community Strategies. San Salvador: The Salvadoran Research Program on
Development and Environment (PRISMA). Online at http://www.prisma.org.sv/pubs/
CES_RC_En.pdf.
■ Samperio, D. 2002. A Fair Grind: Mexico. New York: UNDP Equator Initiative. Online at
http://www.tve.org/ho/doc.cfm?aid=910.
■ Scherr, S., A. White, and D. Kaimowitz. 2002. Making Markets Work for Forest
Communities. Washington, DC and Bogor, Indonesia: Forest Trends and Center for
International Forestry Research.
■ Scherr, S., A. White, and D. Kaimowitz. 2003. A New Agenda for Forest Conservation
and Poverty Reduction: Making Forest Markets Work for Low-Income Producers.
Washington, DC: Forest Trends. Online at http://www.cifor.cgiar.org/publications/
pdf_files/Books/A%20New%20Agenda.pdf.
■ Shanley, P., A. Pierce, S. Laird, and S. Guillen. 2002. Tapping the Green Market:
Management and Certification of Non-Timber Forest Products. Sterling, Virginia: Stylus
Publishing, LLC.
■ Shyamsundar, P., E. Araral, and S. Weerartne. 2004. Devolution of Resource Rights,
Poverty, and Natural Resource Management—A Review. Environment Department
Paper No. 104. Washington, DC: World Bank.
■ Southey, S. 2004. Project Documentation, Kalinga Mission for Indigenous Children
and Youth Development, Inc. (KAMICYDI). UNDP Equator Initiative. Online at
http://www.globalgiving.com/pfil/774/projdoc.doc.
■ Tognetti, S. 2001. Creating Incentives for River Basin Management as a Conservation
Strategy—A Survey of the Literature and Existing Initiatives. Washington, DC: WWF-US.
■ United Nations Housing Rights Programme (UNHRP). 2005. Indigenous Peoples’
Right to Adequate Housing: A Global Overview. Report No. 7. Nairobi: United
Nations Human Settlements Programme. Online athttp://www.unhabitat.org/
programmes/housingpolicy/pubvul.asp
■ United States Agency for International Development (USAID). 2004. USAID Quality
Coffee Program Helps Gain Fame for Nicaraguan Coffee and Higher Incomes for
Farmers. USAID Nicaragua. Online at http://www.usaid.org.ni/ssoct04_1.html.
■ United States Agency for International Development (USAID). 2005. Natural Resource
Management in Namibia. Website. Online at www.usaid.org.na/project.asp?proid=3#top.
■ Waldman, L., with contributions from A. Ballance, R. Benítez Ramos, A. Gadzekpo, O.
Mugyenyi, Q. Nguyen, G. Tumushabe, and H. Stewart. 2005. Environment, Politics, and
Poverty: Lessons from a Review of PRSP Stakeholder Perspectives. Synthesis Review.
Study initiated under the Poverty and Environment Partnership (PEP) and jointly funded
and managed by CIDA, DFID, and GTZ.
■ White, A., and A. Martin. 2002. Who Owns the World’s Forests? Washington, DC: Forest
Trends and Center for International Environmental Law. Online at http://www.cbnrm.net/
pdf/white_a_001_foresttenure.pdf.
■ World Resources Institute (WRI). 2005. “FOODNET Uganda.” Digital Dividend Project
Summary. Washington, DC: WRI. Online at http://wriws1.digitaldividend.org/wri/
app/navigate?_action=opencapsule&_form=default&dbId=1602801%3afcc3edcad7%
3a-7fd2%3a3f-692c-7.
■ World Resources Institute (WRI), United Nations Development Programme, United
Nations Environment Programme, and World Bank. 2003. World Resources 2002-2004:
Decisions for the Earth—Balance, Voice, and Power. Washington, DC: WRI. Online at
http://governance.wri.org/pubs_description.cfm?PubID=3764.
Box 4.1
■ Capitania del Alto y Bajo Izogog (CABI). 2004. “Equator Prize Submission to UN
Development Program’s Equator Initiative.” Santa Cruz: CABI.
■ Noss, A. 2005. Conservation Zoologist and Coordinator, Chaco Landscape program,
Wildlife Conservation Society. Personal Communication. E-mail. April 18, 21, 2005.
■ Roach, J. 2004. “Unique Bolivia Park Begun by Indigenous People.” National Geographic
News (January 13, 2004). Online at http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2004/
2001/0113_040113_chacopark.html.
■ Winer, N. 2003. “Co-Management of Protected Areas, the Oil and Gas Industry and
Indigenous Empowerment—The Experience of Bolivia’s Kaa-Iya del Gran Chaco.” Policy
Matters 12:181-191.
■ Winer, N. 2001. “Bolivia Case Study: Kaa Iya del Gran Chaco.” Report prepared for IUCN
The World Conservation Union.
Box 4.2
■ Bacon, C. 2005. “Confronting the Coffee Crisis: Can Fair Trade, Organic, and Specialty
Coffees Reduce Small-Scale Farmer Vulnerability in Northern Nicaragua?” World
Development 33(3):497-511.
■ Darjeeling Ladenla Road Prerna (RCDC). 1996. Economic and Social Survey Report on
Dabaipani, Harsing and Yangkhoo. Darjeeling, India: RCDC.
■ Down to Earth. 2004. “24/7 Water Supply.” Down to Earth (August 15):44.
■ Fairtrade Labelling Organizations International (FLO). 2004. “Fairtrade Standards
for Coffee.” Online at http://www.fairtrade.net/pdf/sp/english/Coffee%20SP%
20versionJune04.pdf.
■ Fairtrade Labelling Organizations International (FLO). 2005. “Facts and Figures.” FLO
website. Online at http://www.fairtrade.net/sites/impact/facts.html.
■ Howard, K. 2005. Sales Manager, Equal Exchange. Personal Communication. Interview.
January 5, 2005.
■ International Coffee Organization (ICO). 2005. Historical Data: Prices Paid to Growers
in Exporting Member Countries (Monthly). Database. Online at http://www.ico.org/
historical.asp.
■ Murray, D., L. Raynolds, and P. Taylor. 2003. One Cup at a Time: Poverty Alleviation and
Fair Trade Coffee in Latin America. Fort Collins, Colorado: Colorado State University,
Fair Trade Research Group. Online at http://www.colostate.edu/Depts/Sociology/
FairTradeResearchGroup/.
■ Rice, R. 2001. Smithsonian Migratory Bird Center. Personal Communication. E-mail.
June 11, 2001.
■ Taylor, P. 2002. Poverty Alleviation Through Participation in Fair Trade Coffee Networks:
Synthesis of Case Study Research Question Findings. Fort Collins, Colorado: Colorado
State University and the Community and Resource Development Program, Ford
Foundation. Online at http://www.colostate.edu/Depts/Sociology/FairTradeResearchGroup/
doc/pete.pdf.
■ Tea Promoters of India (TPI). 1999. “Small Farmers Scheme, Mineral Springs,
Dabaipani: Yearly Report.” Calcutta, India: TPI.
■ Valencia, A. 2001. “Birds and Beans: The Changing Face of Coffee Production.”
EarthTrends, Features. Washington, DC: World Resources Institute. Online at
http://earthtrends.wri.org/pdf_library/features/bio_fea_coffee.pdf.
■ Young, G. 2003. Fair Trade’s Influential Past and the Challenges of its Future. Brussels,
Belgium: King Baudouin Foundation. Online at http://www.kbs-frb.be.
Box 4.3
■ Annamalai, K., and S. Rao. 2003. What Works: ITC’s e-Choupal and Profitable Rural
Transformation. Washington, DC: World Resources Institute (WRI).
■ e-Choupal. 2005. e-Choupal Website. ITC Ltd. Online at http://www.echoupal.com/.
Box 4.4
■ Echavarría, M. 2002. Water User Associations in the Cauca Valley: A Voluntary
Mechanism to Promote Upstream-Downstream Cooperation in the Protection of Rural
241