Helge GarÃ¥sen The Trondheim Model - NSDM

More documents

Recommendations

Info

And finally to my family I still wonder how my family managed to live with me while I was doing the study, writing the articles and the thesis most of which was done in the late evenings and during holidays; thank you to you all! Hommelvik, October 18 th 2007. Helge Garåsen 14
List of papers The thesis is based on the following papers: Garåsen H, Johnsen R: The quality of communication about older patients between hospital physicians and general practitioners: a panel study assessment. BMC Health Services Research 2007,7:133. Garåsen H, Windspoll R, Johnsen R: Intermediate care at a community hospital as an alternative to prolonged general hospital care for elderly patients: a randomised controlled trial. BMC Public Health 2007,7:68. Garåsen H, Windspoll R, Magnussen J, Johnsen R: Eldre pasienter i sykehus eller i intermediæravdeling i sykehjem. En kostnadsanalyse. [In Norwegian]. [A comparative cost analysis of care for elderly in a general hospital or in an intermediate care department in a community hospital.] Tidsskr Nor Legeforen 2008,128:283-5. Garåsen H, Windspoll R, Johnsen R: Long-term patients’ outcomes after intermediate care at a community hospital for elderly patients: 12 months follow-up of a randomized controlled trial. Scandinavian Journal of Public Health 2008,36: 197-204. 15
Page 1 and 2: Helge Garåsen The Trondheim Model
Page 3 and 4: Trondheimsmodellen Forbedring av ko
Page 5 and 6: Table of content Summary...........
Page 7 and 8: Summary Study I Background Optimal
Page 9 and 10: (p=0.003), and mean difference in c
Page 11 and 12: Studie II Bakgrunn Formålet med st
Page 13: Acknowledgments These studies were
Page 17 and 18: 1.0 Introduction 1.1 Are older pati
Page 19 and 20: documented the benefits of using mu
Page 21 and 22: When composing an expert panel, it
Page 23 and 24: 1.8 Are there any alternatives to g
Page 25 and 26: In the publication Scenario 2030 th
Page 27 and 28: trust between the patient and healt
Page 29 and 30: structured communication formulas (
Page 31 and 32: predicted increases in per capita h
Page 33 and 34: A study in Denmark has shown that a
Page 35 and 36: general hospital care. One of the c
Page 37 and 38: the municipalities of Trondheim and
Page 39 and 40: As the study in question dealt with
Page 41 and 42: quality of life and/or life expecta
Page 43 and 44: 4.2.0 Study population Study II - I
Page 45 and 46: All data was collected by the autho
Page 47 and 48: An important task was to write disc
Page 49 and 50: to the community health system, and
Page 51 and 52: to information about the health car
Page 53 and 54: 2004 and 2005. This solution was us
Page 55 and 56: 100 % said they were treated with r
Page 57 and 58: compared between groups using covar
Page 59 and 60: care and need for long-term nursing
Page 61 and 62: 6.1 Study I - the panel study 6.1.1
Page 63 and 64: e difficult for only one profession
Page 65 and 66:
there were eleven cases with zero a
Page 67 and 68:
trial. Participating departments at
Page 69 and 70:
circumstances, successful diagnoses
Page 71 and 72:
6.4 Costs 6.4.1. Cost assessments E
Page 73 and 74:
workers, physiotherapists, occupati
Page 75 and 76:
The good results shown in several s
Page 77 and 78:
6.8 Discussion of the results 6.8.1
Page 79 and 80:
to be increased with more than 99 %
Page 81 and 82:
In study I all patient data was han
Page 83 and 84:
Main conclusions study II: 1. Care
Page 85 and 86:
12. Slaets JP, Kaufmann RH, Duivnvo
Page 87 and 88:
40. Jakobsen G. Specialised palliat
Page 89 and 90:
69. Ramrakha S, Giles A: Take a let
Page 91 and 92:
98. Kvamme OJ. Samarbeid mellom leg
Page 93 and 94:
127. Krummenauer F. Differenzenplot
Page 95 and 96:
157. Kaplan RM. The significance of
Page 97 and 98:
10.0. Appendices 10.1 VAS for refer
Page 99 and 100:
10.2 VAS for discharge letters. Stu
Page 101 and 102:
10.3 Criteria for inclusion. Study
Page 103 and 104:
10.4 Procedures for including patie
Page 105 and 106:
Behov for følge av sykepleier / hj
Page 107 and 108:
10.6 Consent formula. Study II SAMT
Page 109 and 110:
Recruitment 14 Dates defining the p
Page 111 and 112:
Personlig hygiene Ja Av og til Nei
Page 113 and 114:
eller andre steder der personen van
Page 115 and 116:
Ikke med i pleietyngdegrunnlaget i
Page 117 and 118:
Tjenester IPLOS Lov om sosiale tjen
Page 119:
11.0 Original papers I-IV 119
Page 123 and 124:
BMC Health Services Research BioMed
Page 125 and 126:
BMC Health Services Research 2007,
Page 127 and 128:
Page 129:
Page 133 and 134:
BMC Public Health BioMed Central Re
Page 135 and 136:
BMC Public Health 2007, 7:68 http:/
Page 137 and 138:
Page 139 and 140:
Page 141:
Page 145 and 146:
Medisin og vitenskap Originalartikk
Page 147:
Originalartikkel MEDISIN OG VITENSK
Page 151 and 152:
Scandinavian Journal of Public Heal
Page 153 and 154:
Dissertations at the Faculty of Med
Page 155 and 156:
68. Trond Sand: THE EFFECTS OF CLIC
Page 157 and 158:
139. Fabio Antonaci: CHRONIC PAROXY
Page 159 and 160:
198. Nanna Kurtze: THE SIGNIFICANCE
Page 161 and 162:
251. Aslak Steinsbekk: HOMEOPATHY I
Page 163 and 164:
305. Elisabeth Olstad: GLUTAMATE AN
show all

Helge GarÃ¥sen The Trondheim Model - NSDM

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?