Helge GarÃ¥sen The Trondheim Model - NSDM

More documents

Recommendations

Info

22. Statistisk sentralbyrå. Hjemmesykepleie. Behandlede pasienter. 1965-92. Oslo; 2005. http://www.ssb.no/histstat/tabeller/4-4-17t.txt (10.12.06) 23. Statistisk sentralbyrå. Motakarar av heimetenester, etter alder. 1992-2005. Oslo; 2006. http://www.ssb.no/emner/03/02/helsetjko/arkiv/tab-2006-12-08-05.html (12.10.07) 24. Romøren TI. Den fjerde alderen. Funksjonstap, familiesorg og tjenestebruk hos mennesker over 80 år. Oslo (Gyldendal).2001. 25. Plan for eldreomsorgen i Trondheim kommune 2007-2015. Trondheim;2006. 26. St. Olavs University Hospital. Annual report 2001. [Årsrapport 2001] Trondheim; 2002. 27. St. Olavs University Hospital. Annual report 2003. [Årsrapport 2003] Trondheim; 2004. 28. Municipality of Trondheim. Annual report 2005. [Årsstatistikker 2005].Trondheim; 2006. 29. Statistisk sentralbyrå. Folkemengde, etter kjønn i viktige aldersgrupper.1995-2000-2005. http://statbank.ssb.no/statistikkbanken (10.12.06) 30. Municipality of Trondheim. Annual report 1995. [Årsstatistikker 1995].Trondheim; 1996. 31. Statistisk sentralbyrå. Folkemengde, etter kjønn i viktige aldersgrupper.1995-2000-2005. http://statbank.ssb.no/statistikkbanken (08.07.06). 32. Egenbetaling for helse – og velferdstjenester. 2006. Trondheim, 2006. http://www.trondheim.kommune/content.ap?thisId=968583968 (10.07.06). 33. Fink A, Kosecoff J, Chassin M, Brook RH. Consensus methods: Characteristics and guidelines for use. Am J Public Health. 1984 Sep;74(9):979-83. 34. Campbell S, Cantrill JA, Roberts D. Prescribing indicators for UK general practice: Delphi consultation study. BMJ 2000;321:425-428. 35. Mosca L, Appell L, Benjamin E et al. Evidence-based guidelines for cardiovascular disease prevention in women. J Am Coll Cardiol 2004;43:900-922. 36. Akins RB, Tolson H, Cole BR. Stability of response characteristics of a Delphi panel: application of bootstrap data expansion. BMC Med Res Methodol 2005 Dec 1;5:37. 37. Jones J, Hunter D. Consensus methods for medical and health services research. BMJ 1995;311:376-80. 38. Hasson F, Keeney S, McKenna H. Research guidelines for the Delphi survey technique. J Adv Nurs 2000 Oct (4):1008-15. 39. Garåsen H, Kaasa S, Røsstad T, Broen P. Spesialiserte korttidsplasser i sykehjem - Trondheimsmodellen. Tidsskr Nor Lægeforen 2005; 125: 1503-5. 86
40. Jakobsen G. Specialised palliative care at a nursing home - Description of an integrated model of palliative care and comparison between hospital palliative care and nursing home palliative care. Trondheim; Master Thesis in Health Science, NTNU, 2006. 41. Haugen DF, Jordhøy M, Engstrand P, Hessling S, Garåsen H: Organisering av palliasjon i og utenfor sykehus. Tidsskrift Nor Lægeforen 2005;126:329-32. 42. Garåsen H, Johnsen R. Scenarier fra samarbeidet mellom Trondheim kommune og spesialisthelsetjenesten i Sør-Trøndelag i perioden 1993- 2004. Tidsskr Nor Lægeforen 2005; 125: 1198-200. 43. Hakkaart-van Roijen L, Moll van Charante EP, Bindels P et al. A cost study of a general practitioner hospital in the Netherlands. European Journal of General Practice. 2004;10:45-49. 44. Aaraas I, Melbye H, Eriksen BO, Irtun O. Is the general practitioner hospital a potential ”patient trap”? A panel study of emergency cases transferred to higher level hospitals. Scand J Prim Care 1998 Jun; 16(2)76-80. 45. Aaraas I. The Finnmark general practitioner study. Patient characteristics, patient flow and alternative care level. Scand J Prim Health Care 1995;13:250-6. 46. Aaraas I, Forde OH, Kristiansen IS, Melbye H. Do general practitioners hospitals reduce the utilisation of general hospital beds? Evidence from Finnmark County in North Norway. J Epidemiol Community Health 1998;52:243-6. 47. Donald IP, Jay T, Lidsell J, Foy C. Defining the appropriate use of community hospital beds. British Journal of General Practice 2001;51:95-100. 48. British Geriatrics Society. Intermediate Care. Guidance for Commissioners and Providers of Health and Social Care (revised 2004). BGS Compendium Document 4.2. London; 2004. http://www.bgs.org.uk/Publications/Compendium/compend_4-2.htm (29.07.06). 49. Scenario 2030. Sykdomsutviklingen for eldre frem til 2030. IK 2696. Oslo: Statens helsetilsyns utredningsserie, 2000. 50. Yang Z, Norton E, Stearns S. Longevity and Health Care Expenditures. The Real Reasons Older People Spend More. The Journal of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences 2003;58:S2-S10. 51. SOU 2000:6. Døden angår oss alla. Stockholm; 1999.http://www.regeringen.se/sb/d/108/a/2867 . 52. Gray A: Population Ageing and Health Care Expenditure. Aging Horizons.2005;2:15-20. 53. Eggen B, Løvseth S, Sletvold O, Åm T, Roos E: Evaluering av avtalen om utskrivningsklare pasienter inngått i 1994 mellom Sør-Trøndelag fylkeskommune og Trondheim kommune. Rapport. Trondheim 1995. 54. Morris J. Decent health care for older people. Editorial. BMJ 2006;332:1166-1168. 87
Page 1 and 2:
Helge Garåsen The Trondheim Model
Page 3 and 4:
Trondheimsmodellen Forbedring av ko
Page 5 and 6:
Table of content Summary...........
Page 7 and 8:
Summary Study I Background Optimal
Page 9 and 10:
(p=0.003), and mean difference in c
Page 11 and 12:
Studie II Bakgrunn Formålet med st
Page 13 and 14:
Acknowledgments These studies were
Page 15 and 16:
List of papers The thesis is based
Page 17 and 18:
1.0 Introduction 1.1 Are older pati
Page 19 and 20:
documented the benefits of using mu
Page 21 and 22:
When composing an expert panel, it
Page 23 and 24:
1.8 Are there any alternatives to g
Page 25 and 26:
In the publication Scenario 2030 th
Page 27 and 28:
trust between the patient and healt
Page 29 and 30:
structured communication formulas (
Page 31 and 32:
predicted increases in per capita h
Page 33 and 34:
A study in Denmark has shown that a
Page 35 and 36: general hospital care. One of the c
Page 37 and 38: the municipalities of Trondheim and
Page 39 and 40: As the study in question dealt with
Page 41 and 42: quality of life and/or life expecta
Page 43 and 44: 4.2.0 Study population Study II - I
Page 45 and 46: All data was collected by the autho
Page 47 and 48: An important task was to write disc
Page 49 and 50: to the community health system, and
Page 51 and 52: to information about the health car
Page 53 and 54: 2004 and 2005. This solution was us
Page 55 and 56: 100 % said they were treated with r
Page 57 and 58: compared between groups using covar
Page 59 and 60: care and need for long-term nursing
Page 61 and 62: 6.1 Study I - the panel study 6.1.1
Page 63 and 64: e difficult for only one profession
Page 65 and 66: there were eleven cases with zero a
Page 67 and 68: trial. Participating departments at
Page 69 and 70: circumstances, successful diagnoses
Page 71 and 72: 6.4 Costs 6.4.1. Cost assessments E
Page 73 and 74: workers, physiotherapists, occupati
Page 75 and 76: The good results shown in several s
Page 77 and 78: 6.8 Discussion of the results 6.8.1
Page 79 and 80: to be increased with more than 99 %
Page 81 and 82: In study I all patient data was han
Page 83 and 84: Main conclusions study II: 1. Care
Page 85: 12. Slaets JP, Kaufmann RH, Duivnvo
Page 89 and 90: 69. Ramrakha S, Giles A: Take a let
Page 91 and 92: 98. Kvamme OJ. Samarbeid mellom leg
Page 93 and 94: 127. Krummenauer F. Differenzenplot
Page 95 and 96: 157. Kaplan RM. The significance of
Page 97 and 98: 10.0. Appendices 10.1 VAS for refer
Page 99 and 100: 10.2 VAS for discharge letters. Stu
Page 101 and 102: 10.3 Criteria for inclusion. Study
Page 103 and 104: 10.4 Procedures for including patie
Page 105 and 106: Behov for følge av sykepleier / hj
Page 107 and 108: 10.6 Consent formula. Study II SAMT
Page 109 and 110: Recruitment 14 Dates defining the p
Page 111 and 112: Personlig hygiene Ja Av og til Nei
Page 113 and 114: eller andre steder der personen van
Page 115 and 116: Ikke med i pleietyngdegrunnlaget i
Page 117 and 118: Tjenester IPLOS Lov om sosiale tjen
Page 119: 11.0 Original papers I-IV 119
Page 123 and 124: BMC Health Services Research BioMed
Page 125 and 126: BMC Health Services Research 2007,
Page 127 and 128: BMC Health Services Research 2007,
Page 129: BMC Health Services Research 2007,
Page 133 and 134: BMC Public Health BioMed Central Re
Page 135 and 136: BMC Public Health 2007, 7:68 http:/
Page 137 and 138:
BMC Public Health 2007, 7:68 http:/
Page 139 and 140:
Page 141:
Page 145 and 146:
Medisin og vitenskap Originalartikk
Page 147:
Originalartikkel MEDISIN OG VITENSK
Page 151 and 152:
Scandinavian Journal of Public Heal
Page 153 and 154:
Dissertations at the Faculty of Med
Page 155 and 156:
68. Trond Sand: THE EFFECTS OF CLIC
Page 157 and 158:
139. Fabio Antonaci: CHRONIC PAROXY
Page 159 and 160:
198. Nanna Kurtze: THE SIGNIFICANCE
Page 161 and 162:
251. Aslak Steinsbekk: HOMEOPATHY I
Page 163 and 164:
305. Elisabeth Olstad: GLUTAMATE AN
show all

Helge GarÃ¥sen The Trondheim Model - NSDM

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?