Helge Garåsen The Trondheim Model - NSDM
Helge Garåsen The Trondheim Model - NSDM
Helge Garåsen The Trondheim Model - NSDM
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
4.1.2 Assessments of outcomes<br />
<strong>The</strong>re are several international studies assessing written communication between physicians.<br />
Some earlier studies have assessed the quality of referral letters using questionnaires<br />
(64,70,73) or by audits (69). A Delphi survey with expert panels in a particular area of interest<br />
has been widely utilized in other fields in clinical medicine and health care services (36-<br />
38,118). It has proved to be an effective and reliable method in developing reliable judgments<br />
and criteria of quality guidelines (36-37).<br />
4.1.2.1 Quality of referral and discharge letters<br />
Referral letters from general practitioners to secondary care record the reasons for requesting<br />
a specialist consultation or care at a general hospital. Ideally the referral letters should provide<br />
sufficient information to enable decisions to be made about appropriate care and which<br />
patients should be prioritised to inpatient or outpatient care. Most critiques of referral letters<br />
have been from specialists assessing the referrals from a secondary care perspective, but even<br />
in a study where general practitioners evaluated other general practitioners’ referral letters,<br />
quality was considered to be low (69). <strong>The</strong>re are also several studies (70-76) describing the<br />
insufficient quality of discharge letters even when the content of the referral and discharge<br />
letters had been agreed between physicians beforehand (64-65).<br />
However, there have been few discussions between different health professions about whom<br />
and what the letters should address:<br />
- Is it a letter from one physician to another, for medical diagnosing and treatment of an<br />
illness (“cure”) just describing the most relevant medical facts surrounding the<br />
patients’ situation?<br />
- Is it a letter from a team of professionals to another describing the patient’s disease(s)<br />
and the consequences of the disease(s) for the patient?<br />
- Is it a letter that allows the recipients to optimise the patients’ need for care in a<br />
broader social context including the patients’ ADL?<br />
- Is it a letter summarising what one professional or a team has done of actual<br />
diagnosing and care, functioning as a report and summary of the health journal, i.e.<br />
acting as a document fulfilling legal demands set by the health authorities?<br />
38