29.10.2014 Views

Helge Garåsen The Trondheim Model - NSDM

Helge Garåsen The Trondheim Model - NSDM

Helge Garåsen The Trondheim Model - NSDM

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

4.1.2 Assessments of outcomes<br />

<strong>The</strong>re are several international studies assessing written communication between physicians.<br />

Some earlier studies have assessed the quality of referral letters using questionnaires<br />

(64,70,73) or by audits (69). A Delphi survey with expert panels in a particular area of interest<br />

has been widely utilized in other fields in clinical medicine and health care services (36-<br />

38,118). It has proved to be an effective and reliable method in developing reliable judgments<br />

and criteria of quality guidelines (36-37).<br />

4.1.2.1 Quality of referral and discharge letters<br />

Referral letters from general practitioners to secondary care record the reasons for requesting<br />

a specialist consultation or care at a general hospital. Ideally the referral letters should provide<br />

sufficient information to enable decisions to be made about appropriate care and which<br />

patients should be prioritised to inpatient or outpatient care. Most critiques of referral letters<br />

have been from specialists assessing the referrals from a secondary care perspective, but even<br />

in a study where general practitioners evaluated other general practitioners’ referral letters,<br />

quality was considered to be low (69). <strong>The</strong>re are also several studies (70-76) describing the<br />

insufficient quality of discharge letters even when the content of the referral and discharge<br />

letters had been agreed between physicians beforehand (64-65).<br />

However, there have been few discussions between different health professions about whom<br />

and what the letters should address:<br />

- Is it a letter from one physician to another, for medical diagnosing and treatment of an<br />

illness (“cure”) just describing the most relevant medical facts surrounding the<br />

patients’ situation?<br />

- Is it a letter from a team of professionals to another describing the patient’s disease(s)<br />

and the consequences of the disease(s) for the patient?<br />

- Is it a letter that allows the recipients to optimise the patients’ need for care in a<br />

broader social context including the patients’ ADL?<br />

- Is it a letter summarising what one professional or a team has done of actual<br />

diagnosing and care, functioning as a report and summary of the health journal, i.e.<br />

acting as a document fulfilling legal demands set by the health authorities?<br />

38

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!