29.10.2014 Views

Helge Garåsen The Trondheim Model - NSDM

Helge Garåsen The Trondheim Model - NSDM

Helge Garåsen The Trondheim Model - NSDM

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Table of content<br />

Summary............................................................................................7<br />

Norsk sammendrag (Norwegian summary).................................................10<br />

Acknowledgments ...........................................................................13<br />

List of papers...................................................................................15<br />

Definitions and abbreviations...............................................................16<br />

1.0 Introduction...............................................................................17<br />

1.1 Are older patients treated properly?.........................................................................17<br />

1.2 Older people and medical care ................................................................................17<br />

1.3 Health care consumption among older people in Norway........................................19<br />

1.4 Financing and organising of health care in Norway .................................................19<br />

1.5 Description of an expert panel – the nominal group technique.................................20<br />

1.6 Description of the Delphi technique ........................................................................21<br />

1.7 Definition of an older patient in Study I and Study II ..............................................21<br />

1.8 Description of Community Hospital - Cottage Hospital - General Practitioners<br />

Hospital - Intermediate Care Department - Nursing Home ............................................21<br />

1.8 Description of intermediate care..............................................................................22<br />

1.8 Are there any alternatives to general hospital care? .................................................23<br />

1.9 Alternatives to general hospital care - <strong>The</strong> <strong>Trondheim</strong> <strong>Model</strong>..................................23<br />

2.0 Background...................................................................................24<br />

2.1 <strong>The</strong> demand for health care among older people in the future..................................24<br />

2.2 A revisit to the principle of LEON ..........................................................................25<br />

2.3 Patients’ rights ........................................................................................................26<br />

2.4 Where do the patients want to get care?...................................................................27<br />

2.5 Quality of the written communication between health personnel .............................28<br />

2.6 Inappropriate admissions and discharges.................................................................29<br />

2.7 <strong>The</strong> cost of health care for patients with a poor prognosis........................................30<br />

2.8 Interventions to reduce inappropriate health care for older people at hospitals.........31<br />

2.9 Transferring duties from hospitals to primary care...................................................33<br />

2.10 A silent paradigm shift – from general hospital care to primary care......................34<br />

2.11 <strong>The</strong> chain of care – is there a missing link? ...........................................................34<br />

3.0 Objectives and hypothesis...............................................................35<br />

3.1 <strong>The</strong> main objectives of the thesis.............................................................................35<br />

3.2 Hypothesis ..............................................................................................................36<br />

4.0 Patients and Methods .....................................................................36<br />

4.1.0 Study population. Study I - <strong>The</strong> quality of written communication between a<br />

general hospital and general practitioners......................................................................36<br />

4.1.1 Study design.........................................................................................................37<br />

4.1.2 Assessments of outcomes.....................................................................................38<br />

4.1.2.1 Quality of referral and discharge letters.............................................................38<br />

4.1.2.2 Assessments of the benefits of hospitalisation ...................................................40<br />

4.1.2.3 Assessments of care level..................................................................................41<br />

4.1.2.4 Assessments of alternatives to general hospital care ..........................................41<br />

4.1.3 Statistical analyses study I....................................................................................42<br />

4.2.0 Study population Study II – Intermediate care at a community hospital................43<br />

4.2.1 Study design.........................................................................................................44<br />

5

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!