Helge Garåsen The Trondheim Model - NSDM
Helge Garåsen The Trondheim Model - NSDM
Helge Garåsen The Trondheim Model - NSDM
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Table of content<br />
Summary............................................................................................7<br />
Norsk sammendrag (Norwegian summary).................................................10<br />
Acknowledgments ...........................................................................13<br />
List of papers...................................................................................15<br />
Definitions and abbreviations...............................................................16<br />
1.0 Introduction...............................................................................17<br />
1.1 Are older patients treated properly?.........................................................................17<br />
1.2 Older people and medical care ................................................................................17<br />
1.3 Health care consumption among older people in Norway........................................19<br />
1.4 Financing and organising of health care in Norway .................................................19<br />
1.5 Description of an expert panel – the nominal group technique.................................20<br />
1.6 Description of the Delphi technique ........................................................................21<br />
1.7 Definition of an older patient in Study I and Study II ..............................................21<br />
1.8 Description of Community Hospital - Cottage Hospital - General Practitioners<br />
Hospital - Intermediate Care Department - Nursing Home ............................................21<br />
1.8 Description of intermediate care..............................................................................22<br />
1.8 Are there any alternatives to general hospital care? .................................................23<br />
1.9 Alternatives to general hospital care - <strong>The</strong> <strong>Trondheim</strong> <strong>Model</strong>..................................23<br />
2.0 Background...................................................................................24<br />
2.1 <strong>The</strong> demand for health care among older people in the future..................................24<br />
2.2 A revisit to the principle of LEON ..........................................................................25<br />
2.3 Patients’ rights ........................................................................................................26<br />
2.4 Where do the patients want to get care?...................................................................27<br />
2.5 Quality of the written communication between health personnel .............................28<br />
2.6 Inappropriate admissions and discharges.................................................................29<br />
2.7 <strong>The</strong> cost of health care for patients with a poor prognosis........................................30<br />
2.8 Interventions to reduce inappropriate health care for older people at hospitals.........31<br />
2.9 Transferring duties from hospitals to primary care...................................................33<br />
2.10 A silent paradigm shift – from general hospital care to primary care......................34<br />
2.11 <strong>The</strong> chain of care – is there a missing link? ...........................................................34<br />
3.0 Objectives and hypothesis...............................................................35<br />
3.1 <strong>The</strong> main objectives of the thesis.............................................................................35<br />
3.2 Hypothesis ..............................................................................................................36<br />
4.0 Patients and Methods .....................................................................36<br />
4.1.0 Study population. Study I - <strong>The</strong> quality of written communication between a<br />
general hospital and general practitioners......................................................................36<br />
4.1.1 Study design.........................................................................................................37<br />
4.1.2 Assessments of outcomes.....................................................................................38<br />
4.1.2.1 Quality of referral and discharge letters.............................................................38<br />
4.1.2.2 Assessments of the benefits of hospitalisation ...................................................40<br />
4.1.2.3 Assessments of care level..................................................................................41<br />
4.1.2.4 Assessments of alternatives to general hospital care ..........................................41<br />
4.1.3 Statistical analyses study I....................................................................................42<br />
4.2.0 Study population Study II – Intermediate care at a community hospital................43<br />
4.2.1 Study design.........................................................................................................44<br />
5