Helge Garåsen The Trondheim Model - NSDM
Helge Garåsen The Trondheim Model - NSDM
Helge Garåsen The Trondheim Model - NSDM
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
o Number of deaths (mortality)<br />
o Need for home care<br />
o Need for long-term nursing home care<br />
o Number of general hospital admissions for<br />
! Same disease<br />
! Other diseases<br />
- Costs of<br />
o Prolonged general hospital care after randomisation<br />
o Readmissions to the general hospital<br />
o Care at the community hospital<br />
o Rehabilitation<br />
o Long-term-nursing home care<br />
o Home care<br />
o General hospital admissions for the same disease<br />
o General hospital admissions for other diseases<br />
All of this data was accessible in patients’ health records at St. Olavs University Hospital, the<br />
health records in the municipality of <strong>Trondheim</strong> and in the accounts for both the general<br />
hospital and the municipality for 2004 and 2005.<br />
All information on care within the municipality was collected from the municipal electronic<br />
health records and the municipal electronic administrative system. <strong>The</strong>re was no missing data<br />
in the patient records in the municipality.<br />
<strong>The</strong> study was originally designed to use only paper based health records at the general<br />
hospital. However, 15 health records (paper based) were not available at the general hospital.<br />
As a consequence all the information that was needed, for every patient, was also collected<br />
from the electronic health records (Doculive) used by the general hospital. <strong>The</strong>re were also<br />
some misclassifications in the patient administrative system at the general hospital. Some<br />
general hospital readmissions were classified with the wrong diagnosis, and others were<br />
classified as acute care readmissions when they should have been classified as elective<br />
admissions. <strong>The</strong>se misclassifications were corrected by the use of information from the<br />
electronic health records. As a consequence, all assessments were done based on unabridged<br />
information for all of the patients.<br />
All data was collected by one of the authors, (HG), according to a prepared protocol from<br />
patients’ medical records at the hospital and from primary health services. He only had access<br />
50