11.11.2014 Views

IPDE - Extranet Systems - World Health Organization

IPDE - Extranet Systems - World Health Organization

IPDE - Extranet Systems - World Health Organization

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

A. W. Loranger<br />

had more than one personality disorder, including 55 (15.0%) with two,<br />

32 (8.7%) with three, and 24 (6.6%) with more than three disorders. Of<br />

the 283 patients with an ICD-l0 personality disorder diagnosis, 96<br />

(33.9%) had more than one type of disorder, including 57 (20.1%) with<br />

two, 27 (9.5%) with three, and 12 (4.2%) with more than three disorders.<br />

What are the implications of a patient having more than one form of<br />

mental disorder, particularly more than one type of PD? In some<br />

instances this may merely reflect the fact that twoor more disorders share<br />

similar symptoms or diagnostic criteria. For example, subsme abuse<br />

may be indicative of p r impulse control. a characteristic of antisocial,<br />

emotionally unstable or borderline PD. Similarly, social withdrawal is a<br />

diagnostic criterion shared by both schizoid and avoidant PDs. Another<br />

implication may be pmgnostic or therapeutic, with one disorder modifying<br />

the course or outcome of another. There is evidence, for example, that<br />

depression is less responsive to treatment, when accompanied by a PD.<br />

Comorbidity may also be a consequence of the fact that two disorders<br />

share similar etiologies. Finally, at times comorbidity may also he an<br />

indication of a defective or less thanoptimal classification system.<br />

A fundamental problem in interpreting the meaning of the comorbidity<br />

findings from various sNdies, including this one, is that they are<br />

markedly influenced by the base rates of the disorders in the sample.<br />

These in turn are a function of the admission practices of the facilities<br />

from which the patients are drawn, not to mention the selection biases<br />

for inclusion in the studies themselves. Ideally, comorbidity should he<br />

determined from epidemiological studies based on probability samples<br />

from the community. Unfortunately these rarely if ever include a suffi-<br />

cient number of cases of most disorders, to provide definitive information<br />

about the hue CO-occurrence rates of the disorders in question.<br />

ICD-10 and DSM-IICR<br />

As previously noted, ICD-10 and DSM-111-R are different but overlapping<br />

classification systems. There are slight differences in nomenclature:<br />

anankastidobsessive-compulsive, anxious/avoidant, and dissociaUantisocial.<br />

In ICD-10 borderline and impulsive are viewed as subtypes of<br />

emotionally unstable; schiwtypal is located with schizophrenia and<br />

delusional disorders; and narcissistic, passive-aggressive, and the two<br />

disorders in the appendix of DSM-111-R, sadistic and self-defeating, do<br />

not appear. There are also several significant differences in the criteria in<br />

the two systems and some minor variations in their wording. Except for

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!