12.11.2014 Views

SAVE Commission's findings - La Follette School of Public Affairs ...

SAVE Commission's findings - La Follette School of Public Affairs ...

SAVE Commission's findings - La Follette School of Public Affairs ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

CHAPTER<br />

FOUR<br />

20.13<br />

Decentralize personnel<br />

authority with<br />

accountability.<br />

20.14<br />

Reduce management<br />

layers.<br />

20.15<br />

Restore respect to<br />

public service work.<br />

20.16<br />

Reform total marketsensitive<br />

compensation<br />

to reward results and<br />

skills.<br />

20.17<br />

Maintain core<br />

competencies;<br />

otherwise invite<br />

competition.<br />

20.18<br />

All employees should<br />

contribute.<br />

20.19<br />

Institute a state<br />

government management<br />

model and<br />

common language.<br />

20.20<br />

Re-examine delivery <strong>of</strong><br />

certain state government<br />

services.<br />

20.21<br />

Contract out collective<br />

bargaining.<br />

Patricia A. Patros-<br />

Hanson, Eau Claire<br />

“The policy <strong>of</strong> an agency<br />

having to spend all<br />

funding allocated is<br />

idiotic.”<br />

workers and type <strong>of</strong> work needed. So<br />

job titles, working conditions and work<br />

itself will be for the people involved to<br />

decide, not a distant “specialist”. This<br />

means personnel authority, with accountability,<br />

will be decentralized to the<br />

lowest possible level.<br />

2. Have fewer management layers.<br />

Because employees will be treated more<br />

pr<strong>of</strong>essionally, fewer supervisors will be<br />

needed. Those middle mangers who<br />

remain will have the job <strong>of</strong> helping<br />

employees achieve, together, the mission<br />

<strong>of</strong> the organization based on<br />

performance standards and agreed upon<br />

results. Managers will be leaders, not<br />

controllers.<br />

3. Pay for skill and performance. If<br />

government employees are supposed to<br />

work smarter they need to be paid<br />

accordingly. Because the budget process<br />

will emphasize results, the workers will<br />

be paid for performance, individually or<br />

as members <strong>of</strong> a team. Poor performance,<br />

when it occurs, will similarly be<br />

addressed. Compensation will be<br />

competitive, taking into account total<br />

pay and benefits.<br />

4. Restore respect to public service.<br />

State employees believe they are not<br />

properly understood and their work is<br />

not appreciated. As the management<br />

system produces government<br />

scorecards, the value <strong>of</strong> public employees<br />

will become better known. In<br />

addition, a visible effort involving the<br />

state, unions and private enterprise<br />

should be considered.<br />

R E S U L T S<br />

Delivering a new management<br />

system will:<br />

1 Emphasize measurable results over<br />

meaningless process.<br />

2 Give the taxpayer more value for<br />

today’s dollar and today’s service.<br />

3 Eliminate $2 billion in waste in the<br />

existing civil service and<br />

management system from<br />

duplicative checking and distrust.<br />

4 Bring in the best management<br />

principles from the private sector,<br />

beginning with exhaustive pilot<br />

projects, chartered to produce<br />

measurable results in return for<br />

freedom from many rules,<br />

regulations and burdens that<br />

restrict other agencies.<br />

PROCUREMENT THAT DELIVERS<br />

VALUE<br />

Most state employees complain about<br />

purchasing practices that force them to use<br />

costly and time consuming paperwork and<br />

deny them the flexibility to buy what they need<br />

to do their work, even if it costs less.<br />

Procurement reforms will modernize the<br />

entire system, delegating to the lowest possible<br />

level the responsibility and authority to buy<br />

what’s needed to do the job, as long as the employee<br />

stays within budget. A new system <strong>of</strong><br />

legislative and executive oversight will need to<br />

be designed, but it should not be designed on<br />

the model <strong>of</strong> the current system, which micromanages.<br />

At the same time, employees should be<br />

equipped to become smart buyers. This is the<br />

new service role—as opposed to the existing<br />

controlling role—that will be played by procurement<br />

specialists in state government. In<br />

addition, the employees will become “buyers”<br />

<strong>of</strong> procurement services, requiring the procurement<br />

functions, for the most part, to compete<br />

for business within the state government system.<br />

Other key areas <strong>of</strong> reform include major<br />

changes in the way technology is purchased (the<br />

existing system makes it difficult to buy for<br />

value), increased use <strong>of</strong> partnerships and the<br />

use <strong>of</strong> “sunshine”—or open government reporting—as<br />

a tool insiders can use to do comparison<br />

shopping and outsiders can use to monitor<br />

costs.<br />

5 Reward employees for saving<br />

money.<br />

6 Change civil service by getting rid <strong>of</strong><br />

management layers, focusing on the<br />

mission <strong>of</strong> an agency and paying<br />

workers for skills and performance.<br />

7 Restore respect to public service.<br />

54 CITIZEN • COMMUNITY • GOVERNMENT — WISCONSIN: THE 21 ST CENTURY

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!