12.11.2014 Views

SAVE Commission's findings - La Follette School of Public Affairs ...

SAVE Commission's findings - La Follette School of Public Affairs ...

SAVE Commission's findings - La Follette School of Public Affairs ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

GOAL #20: AN ENTIRELY NEW SYSTEM<br />

20.1<br />

20.2<br />

20.3<br />

20.4<br />

Establish pilot projects and a goal <strong>of</strong> a new<br />

management system by July 1, 1997. For results-oriented<br />

government that allows employees<br />

to function efficiently and effectively, reform<br />

the budget, civil service organizational<br />

management system and procurement process.<br />

Steps to be taken include:<br />

a. Create a cabinet-level government redesign<br />

position to provide visible leadership in<br />

implementing all aspects <strong>of</strong> government<br />

reform, especially improving the personnel<br />

system.<br />

b. Immediately commence at least two pilot<br />

reform projects that demonstrate the ability<br />

<strong>of</strong> labor and management to achieve<br />

results in a mission-driven organization by<br />

identifying and removing barriers to performance.<br />

The Governor and Legislature<br />

must provide direction, freedom and oversight.<br />

Insights learned from the pilots will<br />

be continuously plugged into the reform<br />

process.<br />

c. Commence implementation <strong>of</strong> the new<br />

management system by July 1, 1997.<br />

Adopt a strategy-driven budget process. To<br />

achieve budgets that demand results and see<br />

government as one system, state law should<br />

require strategically developed budgets that<br />

involve many government interests focused on<br />

major objectives. To be effective, strategies<br />

must involve state, local and education government,<br />

with legislative and executive involvement.<br />

The first new budget should be in<br />

1997-99.<br />

Budget for results, not by agency. To facilitate<br />

outcome budgeting, biennial budgets should<br />

be based on results in core areas such as safety,<br />

health, learning and tourism, not by agency.<br />

Agencies will focus on results, rather than protecting<br />

turf. Agencies failing to budget for results<br />

should risk losing the assigned responsibilities<br />

and associated budget dollars and staff.<br />

Reform infrastructure budgeting, decisionmaking<br />

and use. To make infrastructure budgeting<br />

meet reality, end government units’ exclusive<br />

use <strong>of</strong> buildings and other infrastructure.<br />

Reform the infrastructure decisions to<br />

force interagency, state-local and technical and<br />

political interests to see one system (see Goal<br />

#8).<br />

20.5<br />

20.6<br />

20.7<br />

20.8<br />

20.9<br />

20.10<br />

20.11<br />

Reward employees and agencies for saving<br />

money. To encourage frugality, employees and<br />

their work units should be allowed to keep a<br />

portion <strong>of</strong> allotted funds they save. Some<br />

money should be given to employees and<br />

employee teams under certain conditions.<br />

Units should be able to spend some <strong>of</strong> the savings<br />

on priority tasks for at least one time.<br />

Evaluate more reliable long term revenue<br />

sources. To bring tax policy more in line with<br />

21st Century economics, examine existing tax<br />

sources in light <strong>of</strong> other, emerging alternatives<br />

that, because <strong>of</strong> economic, technological or<br />

other changes, are better able to meet state and<br />

local goals.<br />

Establish one electronic government transaction<br />

service. To reduce paperwork, all state,<br />

local and educational governments should be<br />

on one electronic, financial transaction system.<br />

The system should be used for other information<br />

needs such as grant applications, management<br />

guidance, best practice sharing, etc.<br />

Eliminate Constitutional restrictions on purchasing.<br />

To eliminate unnecessary paperwork<br />

and give added purchasing flexibility, abolish<br />

outdated Constitutional restrictions on state<br />

printing procurement.<br />

Modernize procurement practices, top to bottom.<br />

To get greater value, eliminate overly detailed<br />

state procurement laws, giving flexibility<br />

to employees to buy for best value. Maintain<br />

credibility through oversight based on results<br />

and regular disclosure <strong>of</strong> costs, not details,<br />

and through commitment to minority<br />

participation.<br />

Purchasing agents should become helpers and<br />

compete. To help units be better buyers, procurement<br />

personnel should focus on training,<br />

planning, coordination and partnering. Their<br />

service becomes largely self-funded but state<br />

agency “customers” could buy procurement<br />

services elsewhere.<br />

Use strategic partnerships like businesses. To<br />

give government the same quality and value<br />

as business customers, ease restrictions on strategic<br />

partnerships, joint ventures and contracts.<br />

Partnerships <strong>of</strong>ten produce long term savings<br />

that are difficult to achieve through current<br />

government bidding.<br />

CITIZEN • COMMUNITY • GOVERNMENT — WISCONSIN: THE 21 ST CENTURY 69

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!