16.11.2014 Views

Indigenous-Education-Review_DRAFT

Indigenous-Education-Review_DRAFT

Indigenous-Education-Review_DRAFT

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Review</strong> of <strong>Indigenous</strong> <strong>Education</strong> in the Northern Territory<br />

Bruce Wilson<br />

Chapter Four: Two systems<br />

One of the striking outcomes of the review’s analysis is the understanding that Government<br />

schooling in the Northern Territory consists in effect of two education systems. One of these<br />

systems is concentrated in the towns (Darwin, Palmerston, Alice Springs, Katherine,<br />

Nhulunbuy and Tennant Creek). The other is concentrated in other remote and very remote<br />

communities. A list of schools notionally distributed across the two categories is at Appendix<br />

6. The argument for two systems is based on dramatically different patterns of enrolment,<br />

attendance and achievement across the two groups of schools, matched by patterns of<br />

socio‐economic disadvantage. In this chapter and throughout the report, the largely urban<br />

system is described as ‘town’ and the largely remote and very remote system is described as<br />

‘bush’. The term ‘bush schools’ may not be considered appropriate, but no alternative term<br />

has yet been identified.<br />

Terminology used in the report<br />

Although the categories ‘town’ and ‘bush’ cut across geolocations, much of the discussion in<br />

this chapter is based on geolocations. This is because key data are collected by geolocation,<br />

and there is considerable overlap between the very remote geolocation and bush schools.<br />

The review report uses several different forms of terminology to refer to schools and those<br />

who work and learn in them:<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

Schools<br />

where the report concerns data collected by geolocation, it uses the language of<br />

geolocation: ‘provincial’, ‘remote’ and ‘very remote’;<br />

where the discussion concerns analysis or recommendations for the two ‘systems’,<br />

the terms ‘bush’ and ‘town’ are used to define them. The basis for allocation of<br />

schools to these categories is outlined in this chapter; and<br />

where the report makes general points about schools in relatively isolated locations<br />

(ie all remote and very remote schools), it sometimes uses the term ‘remote’ as a<br />

generic descriptor. Where ‘remote’ is used alone, it is always used in this broad,<br />

generic sense (and not to refer specifically to the remote geolocation).<br />

<strong>DRAFT</strong><br />

Northern Territory schools are classified by geolocation. Leaving aside distance education<br />

providers there are 151 schools, of which 43 are provincial (all in Darwin and Palmerston),<br />

28 remote and 80 very remote. This review uses the characteristics discussed in this chapter<br />

to allocate these schools to the two categories, town schools and bush schools. Schools<br />

demonstrating the characteristics associated with greater remoteness (lower enrolment,<br />

attendance and achievement and higher socio‐economic disadvantage) are classed as bush<br />

schools.<br />

The report identifies 86 bush schools, consisting of 76 of the 80 very remote schools (the<br />

four schools in Nhulunbuy and Tennant Creek are categorised as town schools) along with<br />

10 remote schools. It also identifies 65 town schools. As explained in Appendix 6, there are<br />

some schools that sit on the cusp between these two classifications. The three distance<br />

education providers are unclassified.<br />

30

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!