Indigenous-Education-Review_DRAFT
Indigenous-Education-Review_DRAFT
Indigenous-Education-Review_DRAFT
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
<strong>Review</strong> of <strong>Indigenous</strong> <strong>Education</strong> in the Northern Territory<br />
Bruce Wilson<br />
The CFCs provide the department with an opportunity to pilot a flagship model for early<br />
childhood services. At many of the communities the review visited, young mothers drop out<br />
of school due to pregnancy and do not return. Given that level of maternal literacy is a key<br />
predictor of a child’s future literacy attainment, CFCs could provide an opportunity for these<br />
young women to re‐engage with educational options in a supportive environment.<br />
<strong>Education</strong>al courses, childcare and parenting support could all be delivered through the<br />
CFCs. This would assist existing programs. The FaFT Program Handbook, for example, makes<br />
a clear commitment to integrated service delivery. The program:<br />
works in collaboration with other agencies. Strong partnerships with health, shires,<br />
schools, and other agencies are critical for the program success (DECS, 2013C: 10).<br />
The notion of education and health working collaboratively has many perceived benefits to<br />
both the families and the child. Many remote school staff made comments to the review<br />
about the lack of communication between the two agencies resulting in service provision<br />
problems. If services operating through CFCs could have a common assessment and referral<br />
process, this would improve capacity to cater for a child’s needs and provide early diagnosis<br />
and interventions. Services could work with families on all the key domains of the AEDI in a<br />
manner that is clear and consistent and driven by the needs of the child. Achieving this<br />
outcome will involve managing privacy and other legal considerations in access to health<br />
and educational information about children.<br />
We understand that there is at present no certainty about the availability of operational<br />
funding to ensure the effective implementation of the CFCs. The Department and the<br />
Australian Government should work together to ensure that this funding is secured. The<br />
review proposes that the five CFCs be the site of trials to determine the feasibility and<br />
effectiveness of an integrated model of service delivery involving at least health and<br />
education, with the potential to further integrate children’s services.<br />
Recommendations<br />
<strong>DRAFT</strong><br />
6. Maintain Families as First Teachers (FaFT) in its current form pending data from<br />
the evaluation consider additional target communities, improve implementation<br />
where weaknesses are identified and improve the training profile of <strong>Indigenous</strong><br />
staff.<br />
7. Strengthen parent engagement by mandating a school‐driven transition<br />
program from FaFT to pre‐school and from pre‐school to school that:<br />
a. provides ongoing support for both children and parents;<br />
b. supports parents to understand the developmental stages of their<br />
children; and<br />
c. provides opportunities for parents to engage with their child’s<br />
education.<br />
8. Define appropriate phonemic awareness skills and teaching strategies and<br />
implement them in pre‐schools.<br />
55