16.11.2014 Views

Indigenous-Education-Review_DRAFT

Indigenous-Education-Review_DRAFT

Indigenous-Education-Review_DRAFT

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Review</strong> of <strong>Indigenous</strong> <strong>Education</strong> in the Northern Territory<br />

Bruce Wilson<br />

Chapter Nine: Attendance<br />

The Northern Territory Government has spent incalculable resources over many years to<br />

improve the school attendance of <strong>Indigenous</strong> attendance, but without material<br />

improvement. Despite the establishment of major policy statements and the development<br />

of comprehensive strategies, attendance continues to lag.<br />

The review has identified a number of reasons for this situation:<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

factors that are outside the control of schools, such as cultural and ceremonial<br />

activities; family mobility; timing of royalty payments, the Darwin Show and similar<br />

events, football carnivals and rodeos; lack of parent and community support for<br />

attendance; overcrowding; social disruption affecting children including gambling,<br />

substance abuse and violence; lack of employment and the routines and benefits that<br />

accompany employment among parents; and natural events that disrupt attendance;<br />

the failure of schools to effectively achieve educational progress, especially in early<br />

literacy, among some attending students;<br />

the weakness of some secondary programs in schools and their lack of a connection<br />

with valued outcomes; and<br />

a lack of Department and school focus on what schools are best able to do to improve<br />

attendance among their enrolled students.<br />

Learning Lessons<br />

Learning Lessons argued that ‘…children must attend school consistently to progress. In<br />

relation to indigenous education, poor attendance is without doubt the primary cause of<br />

poor educational outcomes’ (Collins, 1999: 141). The issues described by Collins included the<br />

lack of consistent attendance and the lack of expectation from a school, community and<br />

system perspective. A culture of low expectation and low motivation to engage in schooling<br />

was seen a major contributor to poor attendance and education outcomes. The nature and<br />

depth of the attendance story was difficult to quantify. System data did not convey the<br />

seriousness of the issue, nor could it be used to identify trends and patterns of school<br />

attendance.<br />

<strong>DRAFT</strong><br />

The situation now<br />

Since the Collins review, the situation has continued to deteriorate. The average attendance<br />

of <strong>Indigenous</strong> students in 2002 was 70%. By 2012 the percentage was around 68%, while<br />

attendance for <strong>Indigenous</strong> secondary students in very remote schools had dropped<br />

dramatically, heading towards 50%. A recent report shows that only 40% of <strong>Indigenous</strong><br />

students attend school 80 per cent or more of the time (four days a week or more), widely<br />

regarded as a key benchmark for achievement.<br />

This is not for want of trying. Both the Territory and Australian Governments have made<br />

major efforts to improve attendance. The Northern Territory Department’s Every Child Every<br />

Day policy initiative sets out an ambitious and demanding program of action. The Australian<br />

Government’s School Enrolment and Attendance Measure (SEAM) and more recently the<br />

Remote Schools Attendance Strategy both aim to address the problem head on.<br />

83

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!