Indigenous-Education-Review_DRAFT
Indigenous-Education-Review_DRAFT
Indigenous-Education-Review_DRAFT
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
<strong>Review</strong> of <strong>Indigenous</strong> <strong>Education</strong> in the Northern Territory<br />
Bruce Wilson<br />
Chapter Nine: Attendance<br />
The Northern Territory Government has spent incalculable resources over many years to<br />
improve the school attendance of <strong>Indigenous</strong> attendance, but without material<br />
improvement. Despite the establishment of major policy statements and the development<br />
of comprehensive strategies, attendance continues to lag.<br />
The review has identified a number of reasons for this situation:<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
factors that are outside the control of schools, such as cultural and ceremonial<br />
activities; family mobility; timing of royalty payments, the Darwin Show and similar<br />
events, football carnivals and rodeos; lack of parent and community support for<br />
attendance; overcrowding; social disruption affecting children including gambling,<br />
substance abuse and violence; lack of employment and the routines and benefits that<br />
accompany employment among parents; and natural events that disrupt attendance;<br />
the failure of schools to effectively achieve educational progress, especially in early<br />
literacy, among some attending students;<br />
the weakness of some secondary programs in schools and their lack of a connection<br />
with valued outcomes; and<br />
a lack of Department and school focus on what schools are best able to do to improve<br />
attendance among their enrolled students.<br />
Learning Lessons<br />
Learning Lessons argued that ‘…children must attend school consistently to progress. In<br />
relation to indigenous education, poor attendance is without doubt the primary cause of<br />
poor educational outcomes’ (Collins, 1999: 141). The issues described by Collins included the<br />
lack of consistent attendance and the lack of expectation from a school, community and<br />
system perspective. A culture of low expectation and low motivation to engage in schooling<br />
was seen a major contributor to poor attendance and education outcomes. The nature and<br />
depth of the attendance story was difficult to quantify. System data did not convey the<br />
seriousness of the issue, nor could it be used to identify trends and patterns of school<br />
attendance.<br />
<strong>DRAFT</strong><br />
The situation now<br />
Since the Collins review, the situation has continued to deteriorate. The average attendance<br />
of <strong>Indigenous</strong> students in 2002 was 70%. By 2012 the percentage was around 68%, while<br />
attendance for <strong>Indigenous</strong> secondary students in very remote schools had dropped<br />
dramatically, heading towards 50%. A recent report shows that only 40% of <strong>Indigenous</strong><br />
students attend school 80 per cent or more of the time (four days a week or more), widely<br />
regarded as a key benchmark for achievement.<br />
This is not for want of trying. Both the Territory and Australian Governments have made<br />
major efforts to improve attendance. The Northern Territory Department’s Every Child Every<br />
Day policy initiative sets out an ambitious and demanding program of action. The Australian<br />
Government’s School Enrolment and Attendance Measure (SEAM) and more recently the<br />
Remote Schools Attendance Strategy both aim to address the problem head on.<br />
83