Indigenous-Education-Review_DRAFT
Indigenous-Education-Review_DRAFT
Indigenous-Education-Review_DRAFT
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
<strong>Review</strong> of <strong>Indigenous</strong> <strong>Education</strong> in the Northern Territory<br />
Bruce Wilson<br />
Chapter Eleven: Community engagement<br />
There is a widespread view in the Northern Territory that the engagement of communities in the<br />
education of <strong>Indigenous</strong> children is critical to their success. Community engagement is seen as both a<br />
right and a condition for the effective governance of schools and their capacity to respond to local<br />
culture and meet local expectations. This view has led to a long series of initiatives designed to establish<br />
stronger community engagement. Despite determined efforts, however, engagement remains uneven.<br />
Work undertaken by the review indicates that factors contributing to the difficulty in establishing strong<br />
and effective community engagement include:<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
matters that schools and the education system cannot control, such as social dislocation in<br />
communities, language barriers and in some cases lack of community experience in formal<br />
governance processes;<br />
lack of clarity in the Department’s expectations about the responsibilities of principals and<br />
teachers for community engagement;<br />
lack of confidence in and support for community engagement at system and regional level,<br />
including the key role played by <strong>Indigenous</strong> staff;<br />
pursuit of whole‐system engagement models that attempt too much in too short a time;<br />
lack of confidence by some school personnel about community engagement and in some cases, a<br />
degree of resistance;<br />
failure to focus agreements on specific short‐ and medium‐term action and outcomes to establish<br />
a history of success;<br />
weaknesses in cultural training and ongoing support for existing and new staff; and<br />
failure by both the Department and communities to sustain engagement efforts beyond the initial<br />
development of an agreement.<br />
Learning Lessons<br />
Learning Lessons recommendations on partnerships and the self‐managing schools program focused on<br />
the authority of the <strong>Indigenous</strong> <strong>Education</strong> Council Northern Territory (IECNT). Learning Lessons<br />
explored options to break down the barriers between schools and communities and proposed the<br />
piloting of local and regional partnerships, under the auspice of the IECNT (Collins, 1999: 164).<br />
<strong>DRAFT</strong><br />
Negotiated agreements were to include components such as attendance, retention, flexible schooling,<br />
goals for improved education outcomes, improved facilities and professional development/staffing<br />
programs.<br />
Collins identified two approaches to parent and community engagement in education decision‐making:<br />
School Councils and a program called Aboriginal Student Support and Parental Awareness (ASSPA)<br />
committees. The effectiveness of either of these mechanisms was not known at the time of Learning<br />
Lessons, and the ASSPA program, which was funded through the Australian Government, ceased some<br />
time ago.<br />
In 2005, the then Department of Employment, <strong>Education</strong> and Training published a Community<br />
Engagement Charter (DEET, 2005). This document set out a broad set of principles for and approaches<br />
to community engagement. Use of the document appears to have ceased, and it is no longer available<br />
on the Department’s website.<br />
98