16.11.2014 Views

Indigenous-Education-Review_DRAFT

Indigenous-Education-Review_DRAFT

Indigenous-Education-Review_DRAFT

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Review</strong> of <strong>Indigenous</strong> <strong>Education</strong> in the Northern Territory<br />

Bruce Wilson<br />

Chapter Eleven: Community engagement<br />

There is a widespread view in the Northern Territory that the engagement of communities in the<br />

education of <strong>Indigenous</strong> children is critical to their success. Community engagement is seen as both a<br />

right and a condition for the effective governance of schools and their capacity to respond to local<br />

culture and meet local expectations. This view has led to a long series of initiatives designed to establish<br />

stronger community engagement. Despite determined efforts, however, engagement remains uneven.<br />

Work undertaken by the review indicates that factors contributing to the difficulty in establishing strong<br />

and effective community engagement include:<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

matters that schools and the education system cannot control, such as social dislocation in<br />

communities, language barriers and in some cases lack of community experience in formal<br />

governance processes;<br />

lack of clarity in the Department’s expectations about the responsibilities of principals and<br />

teachers for community engagement;<br />

lack of confidence in and support for community engagement at system and regional level,<br />

including the key role played by <strong>Indigenous</strong> staff;<br />

pursuit of whole‐system engagement models that attempt too much in too short a time;<br />

lack of confidence by some school personnel about community engagement and in some cases, a<br />

degree of resistance;<br />

failure to focus agreements on specific short‐ and medium‐term action and outcomes to establish<br />

a history of success;<br />

weaknesses in cultural training and ongoing support for existing and new staff; and<br />

failure by both the Department and communities to sustain engagement efforts beyond the initial<br />

development of an agreement.<br />

Learning Lessons<br />

Learning Lessons recommendations on partnerships and the self‐managing schools program focused on<br />

the authority of the <strong>Indigenous</strong> <strong>Education</strong> Council Northern Territory (IECNT). Learning Lessons<br />

explored options to break down the barriers between schools and communities and proposed the<br />

piloting of local and regional partnerships, under the auspice of the IECNT (Collins, 1999: 164).<br />

<strong>DRAFT</strong><br />

Negotiated agreements were to include components such as attendance, retention, flexible schooling,<br />

goals for improved education outcomes, improved facilities and professional development/staffing<br />

programs.<br />

Collins identified two approaches to parent and community engagement in education decision‐making:<br />

School Councils and a program called Aboriginal Student Support and Parental Awareness (ASSPA)<br />

committees. The effectiveness of either of these mechanisms was not known at the time of Learning<br />

Lessons, and the ASSPA program, which was funded through the Australian Government, ceased some<br />

time ago.<br />

In 2005, the then Department of Employment, <strong>Education</strong> and Training published a Community<br />

Engagement Charter (DEET, 2005). This document set out a broad set of principles for and approaches<br />

to community engagement. Use of the document appears to have ceased, and it is no longer available<br />

on the Department’s website.<br />

98

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!