Cultural Plan 2013-2016 final.pdf - Coffs Harbour City Council ...
Cultural Plan 2013-2016 final.pdf - Coffs Harbour City Council ...
Cultural Plan 2013-2016 final.pdf - Coffs Harbour City Council ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
As adopted by <strong>Council</strong> on 28 February <strong>2013</strong><br />
facility like a gallery to have relevance to young people, it will need to acknowledge the<br />
central role the digital technology plays in their lives. While not practical in the current<br />
premises, any new facility will need to engage fully with digital arts and social media.<br />
A consumer’s role is shifting from that of being a passive receiver to an active contributor. As<br />
technology continues to enable new avenues for communication, collaboration, and<br />
circulation of ideas, it has also given rise to new opportunities for people to create their own<br />
content. For young people in particular the opportunity to create and show their work,<br />
particularly to their peers, can be very attractive.<br />
If a new facility were built, the gallery would ideally be co-located with the proposed<br />
Aboriginal <strong>Cultural</strong> Heritage Centre (discussed below) or a redeveloped <strong>City</strong> Library<br />
(discussed below) as the synergies in the requirements with either cultural facility are<br />
considerable. In particular, facilities for children’s and schools programs could be shared as<br />
well as reception, toilet and other facilities, maintenance and security. Depending on the<br />
budget and design, an outdoor but undercover performance area could be included, as<br />
suggested by a number of community members.<br />
There are a number of issues for consideration with co-location of any cultural facilities.<br />
Relevant questions include:<br />
Are the functions of the facilities compatible in terms of community uses and<br />
benefits?<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
Are there programming benefits likely from co-location eg school holiday activities?<br />
Would some spaces or services be provided more cost effectively to the community<br />
by being available for the use of more than one facility eg a digital arts area?<br />
Are there significant economies in operational costs likely in terms of shared<br />
marketing, maintenance, security, reception and the like?<br />
Is co-location more attractive to those bodies or individuals likely to supply resources<br />
to the project, in particular construction costs, ongoing operational funding or land?<br />
Would the proposed co-location have any wider economic benefits for the<br />
community?<br />
Is it compatible with the <strong>Coffs</strong> <strong>Harbour</strong> CBD Master <strong>Plan</strong>?<br />
In the meantime, at least one contemporary regional Aboriginal artist should be included in<br />
each annual program at the Regional Gallery.<br />
Page 30