29.11.2014 Views

Part D – Understanding and improving industry performance (PDF ...

Part D – Understanding and improving industry performance (PDF ...

Part D – Understanding and improving industry performance (PDF ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

11.8.3. Affiliation with more than<br />

one network<br />

Current regulation does not expressly restrict an operator<br />

from affiliating with more than one network where this<br />

opportunity does in fact exist. However, the inquiry<br />

underst<strong>and</strong>s that the relevant provisions are interpreted in<br />

this way by the VTD. The objectives in excluding multiple<br />

affiliations are unclear. Somewhat superficial reasons<br />

such as that the driver will be unable to wear the uniform<br />

of two NSPs at one time have been offered as relevant<br />

considerations.<br />

The impact of this restriction is that it limits NSPs from<br />

competing for additional subscriptions for taxis in what<br />

may potentially be a lucrative market. If this limitation is<br />

removed, NSPs may contribute to greater competitive<br />

tension <strong>and</strong> thereby provide greater choice to taxi<br />

operators <strong>and</strong> taxi consumers. Affiliating with more than<br />

one NSP under the current pricing arrangements could<br />

entail significant additional costs for operators. Without<br />

this limitation, however, NSPs could choose to offer<br />

tailored pricing packages for operators to encourage<br />

them to subscribe to their network at certain times or<br />

for certain services. This offering would then become a<br />

‘value decision’ for operators who presumably will only<br />

subscribe to the network’s package if they can see a<br />

net benefit. In turn, NSPs may then have an incentive to<br />

seek out niche markets or exp<strong>and</strong> services beyond the<br />

traditional market.<br />

11.8.4. Driver <strong>and</strong> passenger safety<br />

As discussed in chapter 17, the inquiry has identified<br />

significant problems with the existing emergency<br />

warning systems currently in use. One reform option is to<br />

develop minimum st<strong>and</strong>ards to ensure that acceptable<br />

<strong>performance</strong> thresholds can be met without m<strong>and</strong>ating<br />

how an operator meets these st<strong>and</strong>ards <strong>and</strong> thresholds.<br />

While acknowledging that a strong case exists for a<br />

system to monitor the safety of passengers <strong>and</strong> drivers,<br />

NSPs do not need to be the exclusive providers of such<br />

as system. The development of minimum outcome<br />

st<strong>and</strong>ards will enable other providers to enter the market<br />

where they consider they can obtain sufficient take-up of<br />

their product by taxi operators.<br />

11.8.5. Barriers to entry at the taxi<br />

network level<br />

As mentioned earlier in section 11.4, NSPs are required<br />

to obtain an accreditation with the VTD. The accreditation<br />

scheme is a barrier to new entrants to the <strong>industry</strong><br />

to some extent <strong>and</strong> is difficult to justify in light of the<br />

impediments it has presented to the <strong>industry</strong> in achieving<br />

quality services themselves.<br />

The inquiry recognises the importance in the ongoing<br />

regulation of networks however any scheme should<br />

<strong>and</strong> only be imposed provided measurable benefits for<br />

consumers can be demonstrated. Any such scheme<br />

should not serve to restrict competition in this market.<br />

A significant step here would be to recognise that<br />

operators could link to any NSP, not just one within their<br />

zone. This would immediately increase contestability<br />

among NSPs <strong>and</strong> reduce entry barriers.<br />

Some of the requirements of the current scheme that<br />

have delivered little value, in the view of the inquiry, include<br />

the requirements to demonstrate financial suitability <strong>and</strong><br />

business capability. In the case of financial suitability,<br />

general laws regulated by the Australian Securities <strong>and</strong><br />

Investment Commission already prohibit an organisation<br />

from trading while insolvent. In the case of business<br />

capability, the inquiry is aware that this provision is<br />

interpreted broadly in practice, <strong>and</strong> can be an onerous<br />

hurdle for a new network. In general, the market is a better<br />

regulator of business capability by allowing those networks<br />

with the best business capability to prosper.<br />

The inquiry acknowledges that there is a case for<br />

retaining a character assessment for relevant persons<br />

however, there appears to be considerable scope to<br />

rationalise this assessment given the different relationship<br />

NSPs have with customers as compared with drivers or<br />

other <strong>industry</strong> participants.<br />

Under a future scheme where self-regulation <strong>and</strong> the<br />

market are relied on more to deliver benefits to the<br />

community, the regulatory scheme for networks could<br />

be used to aid data collection <strong>and</strong> proper identification<br />

of organisations. These measures would be necessary<br />

in order to publish <strong>performance</strong> information to assist<br />

taxi customers.<br />

Inquiry findings<br />

è Reforms are needed to lower the barriers<br />

to new taxi networks forming <strong>and</strong> to give<br />

operators greater bargaining power <strong>and</strong><br />

choice, while still protecting the safety of<br />

drivers <strong>and</strong> customers.<br />

<strong>Underst<strong>and</strong>ing</strong> <strong>industry</strong> <strong>performance</strong> CUSTOMERS FIRST 249

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!