04.01.2015 Views

Astronomy Principles and Practice Fourth Edition.pdf

Astronomy Principles and Practice Fourth Edition.pdf

Astronomy Principles and Practice Fourth Edition.pdf

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

290 Detectors for optical telescopes<br />

Figure 18.5. A density scan through a recorded image with a sharp change in strength illustrates the Eberhard<br />

effect.<br />

of incident energy but on the rate at which it arrives. In effect, reciprocity failure means that there<br />

are different characteristic curves available according to how the calibration exposures are imposed so<br />

that, before any photometry can be attempted, the characteristic curve, as obtained via the calibration<br />

exposures, must be corrected for reciprocity effects. On this account alone, photographic photometry<br />

is open to systematic error. By a similar argument, the brightnesses of astronomical objects recorded<br />

on two different plates cannot be compared directly if the exposure times are different.<br />

It is also important to consider the effects of reciprocity failure when an emulsion is being chosen<br />

for a particular type of photograph. For example, it might be thought that the fastest possible plate<br />

should be chosen to record faint stars in the shortest possible time. Now the speed of a film is normally<br />

determined according to how it behaves under the circumstances of everyday photography with very<br />

short exposures. If the reciprocity failure is severe, as it usually is for everyday fast emulsions, the<br />

effectiveness of the plate with long exposures can be so reduced as to be inferior to other plates with<br />

small reciprocity failures but with lower everyday photographic speeds.<br />

There are several other effects besides reciprocity failure which can lead to distorted<br />

measurements unless they are allowed for. The following two result from the development process<br />

itself, the first affecting photometry <strong>and</strong> the second, positional measurements.<br />

If an object has detail in it which is recorded on the photographic plate, during the process of<br />

development the chemical reactions will be under way at different rates, according to the position in<br />

the image. In regions where the image is most dense, the reaction is most speedy; however, in other<br />

regions, the development will proceed at a lower rate. Because of this, there will be localized variations<br />

in the rate at which the developer is being used <strong>and</strong>, therefore, in its strength. Unless they are disturbed<br />

adequately by agitation, these variations will control the development rate to some extent. The effect<br />

of unequal development rates is usually manifest where there are sudden changes in the density of an<br />

image, causing distortions of density values. It is known as the Eberhard effect <strong>and</strong> it is illustrated in<br />

figure 18.5.<br />

Positional measurements are obviously affected if there are geometric distortions in the gelatin of<br />

the emulsion <strong>and</strong> this can occur in the development process. During development, the gelatin becomes<br />

tanned <strong>and</strong> the extent of the tanning process increases where the images are strongest. The effect of<br />

tanning is to make the emulsion dry quicker <strong>and</strong> this sets up strains as the tanned areas shrink. In the<br />

simple case of a double star measurement, the shrinkage causes the star images to move together <strong>and</strong>,<br />

if the effect is not allowed for, systematic errors may result.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!