04.01.2015 Views

Astronomy Principles and Practice Fourth Edition.pdf

Astronomy Principles and Practice Fourth Edition.pdf

Astronomy Principles and Practice Fourth Edition.pdf

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Unsharp masking 293<br />

18.9 Unsharp masking<br />

Much fine detail is often lost in an astronomical photograph of an extended field because it varies little<br />

with respect to the background brightness. Unsharp masking is an image-processing technique that<br />

enhances the fine detail. The original picture is processed to obtain a negative mask, such a mask being<br />

of low density <strong>and</strong> slightly out of focus. This mask is then superimposed on the original, resulting<br />

in a decrease in the brightness range of the original but without decreasing the fine detail. The tiny<br />

brightness variations over the original can then be seen more clearly. The Australian astronomer,<br />

David Malin, has produced many beautiful pictures of celestial objects such as the Orion Nebula<br />

using unsharp masking, revealing by this method fine detail that otherwise would effectively be lost.<br />

A selection of such images is available from the Anglo-Australian Observatory (AAO) W18.1 . This<br />

processing technique can also be applied to images recorded in electronic form with the operation<br />

undertaken by software rather than by using a physical mask.<br />

18.10 Photoelectric devices<br />

18.10.1 Introduction<br />

When optical radiation falls on certain alkali materials, electrons are liberated <strong>and</strong> ejected from the<br />

material’s surface. By encapsulating the photosensitive material in a vacuum <strong>and</strong> providing a plate<br />

with a positive potential, the ejected electrons, or photoelectrons as they are called, can be collected<br />

<strong>and</strong> their flow can be measured as an electric current. This type of detector provides the means of<br />

performing extremely accurate photometry. One of the chief reasons for this is that the size of the<br />

current is exactly proportional to the amount of energy which falls on the sensitive surface <strong>and</strong> this<br />

holds for the whole of the range of energies which are likely to be presented to the device. The device<br />

is said to have a linear response.<br />

18.10.2 Spectral sensitivity<br />

A range of photocathodes is available covering the spectrum from the ultraviolet to about 10 000 Å.<br />

The cut-off in the ultraviolet is controlled by the glass envelope of the cell <strong>and</strong>, by using a quartz<br />

window above the cathode, the ultraviolet sensitivity can be extended. The various spectral responses<br />

are designated by a number (e.g. S–1) <strong>and</strong> three such sensitivity curves are depicted in figure 18.6.<br />

18.10.3 Quantum efficiency<br />

The quantum efficiency of the response is typically of the order of 0·1 or 10%, meaning that, on<br />

average, one photoelectron is emitted for every ten photons which are incident on the sensitive surface.<br />

Using this information, it is very easy to predict the current to be measured according to the energy<br />

arrival rate. For example, if the photoelectric cell is receiving 200 photons s −1 (i.e. the photon rate just<br />

detectable by eye), the number of photoelectrons emitted is 20 s −1 . Now the charge on an electron is<br />

equal to 1·6 × 10 −19 coulomb (C) <strong>and</strong>, therefore, the total charge liberated is<br />

20 × 1·6 × 10 −19 Cs −1 = 3·2 × 10 −18 A.<br />

This, of course, is an extremely small current <strong>and</strong> it would require large amplification before it could<br />

be registered by some recording device.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!