Highways Agency Annual Report and Accounts 2011-2012
Highways Agency Annual Report and Accounts 2011-2012
Highways Agency Annual Report and Accounts 2011-2012
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
SECTION 6: Governance statement<br />
investigations undertaken. A non executive<br />
director attends each meeting of the Fraud<br />
Sub-Committee.<br />
- The <strong>Agency</strong> is Investors in People<br />
accredited. This is a proven business<br />
improvement framework that significantly<br />
improves financial performance, productivity<br />
<strong>and</strong> employee involvement <strong>and</strong> focus.<br />
• Project & Contract Management - We<br />
manage our projects <strong>and</strong> contracts to ensure<br />
delivery on time, within budget <strong>and</strong> to the<br />
appropriate quality. Control systems include:<br />
- A Project Control Framework which specifies<br />
the detailed governance processes <strong>and</strong><br />
procedures that major projects must follow<br />
to ensure they deliver the required outputs of<br />
each project phase on time <strong>and</strong> to budget.<br />
The framework also defines the project<br />
lifecycle, roles <strong>and</strong> responsibilities <strong>and</strong><br />
project deliverables.<br />
- Use of the OGC Gateway Review method<br />
of providing project assurance. Competent<br />
programme <strong>and</strong> project management<br />
ensures that issues are not overlooked, time<br />
<strong>and</strong> money is not wasted, <strong>and</strong> resources are<br />
effectively deployed.<br />
- Centralised procurement function for<br />
contracts >£15k which are h<strong>and</strong>led by<br />
a central Division <strong>and</strong> any single tender<br />
action requires the personal approval of the<br />
Procurement Director.<br />
- Use of Earned Value Management on all key<br />
investments to inform <strong>and</strong> enable meaningful<br />
challenge.<br />
- Compliance by Managing Agents to their<br />
contracts is checked by an external team of<br />
auditors under a Performance Audit Function<br />
Framework.<br />
• Compliance with St<strong>and</strong>ards & Requirements -<br />
Our people, partners <strong>and</strong> procedures comply<br />
with relevant legal, government, departmental<br />
<strong>and</strong> technical st<strong>and</strong>ards <strong>and</strong> requirements. The<br />
<strong>Agency</strong>’s arrangements include:<br />
- A dedicated team deals with compliance<br />
with the statutory processes for the<br />
acquisition, management <strong>and</strong> disposal of<br />
l<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong> property in connection with the<br />
<strong>Agency</strong>’s activities. Other teams deal with<br />
the statutory requirements concerning<br />
road building, <strong>and</strong> the management <strong>and</strong><br />
maintenance of the strategic road network.<br />
- Technical governance procedures to ensure<br />
that the <strong>Agency</strong> conducts its business in<br />
accordance with the appropriate technical<br />
st<strong>and</strong>ards, <strong>and</strong> include measures to govern<br />
any necessary departure from engineering<br />
st<strong>and</strong>ards.<br />
- Compliance with European Union legislation<br />
<strong>and</strong> st<strong>and</strong>ards where appropriate regarding<br />
several areas including procurement <strong>and</strong><br />
health <strong>and</strong> safety.<br />
Audit <strong>and</strong> Assurance<br />
As Accounting Officer, I have responsibility for<br />
reviewing the effectiveness of the system of<br />
internal control. My review of the effectiveness<br />
of the system of internal control is informed<br />
by the work of the internal auditors <strong>and</strong> the<br />
executive managers within the <strong>Agency</strong> who<br />
have responsibility for the development <strong>and</strong><br />
maintenance of the internal control framework,<br />
<strong>and</strong> comments made by the external auditors in<br />
their management letter <strong>and</strong> other reports. I have<br />
been advised on the implications of the result<br />
of my review of the effectiveness of the system<br />
of internal control by the Board <strong>and</strong> the Audit<br />
Committee <strong>and</strong> a plan to address weaknesses<br />
<strong>and</strong> ensure continuous improvement of the<br />
system is in place.<br />
My Head of Internal Audit provides regular<br />
reports on key risk <strong>and</strong> control issues, to<br />
st<strong>and</strong>ards defined in the Government Internal<br />
Audit st<strong>and</strong>ards, <strong>and</strong> an annual independent<br />
opinion on the adequacy <strong>and</strong> effectiveness of<br />
the <strong>Agency</strong>’s system of internal control together<br />
with recommendations for improvement. The<br />
implementation of recommendations is monitored<br />
closely by the <strong>Agency</strong> Board <strong>and</strong> is included on<br />
the performance scorecard. The Head of Internal<br />
Audit’s opinion for the year <strong>2011</strong>-12 is that on<br />
the basis of the evidence obtained during the<br />
year a ‘Reasonable’ assurance rating can be<br />
provided on the adequacy <strong>and</strong> effectiveness<br />
of the <strong>Agency</strong>’s arrangements for corporate<br />
governance, risk management <strong>and</strong> internal<br />
control, ie that they are generally established<br />
<strong>and</strong> effective, with some minor weaknesses or<br />
<strong>Highways</strong> <strong>Agency</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Accounts</strong> <strong>2011</strong>-12