06.01.2015 Views

usaid/nambia environmental threats and opportunities assessment

usaid/nambia environmental threats and opportunities assessment

usaid/nambia environmental threats and opportunities assessment

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Reduced groundwater recharge, lower water tables <strong>and</strong> <strong>threats</strong> to valuable ephemeral river<br />

habitats<br />

The expected responses of selected game species include:-<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

Reduced carrying capacity will lead to a decline of 11-22% in the numbers of the main grazing<br />

species. However, in areas where wildlife is below carrying capacity, these impacts may not be as<br />

severe.<br />

Arid-adapted species (springbok, gemsbok ) experience expansions into the north east;<br />

Blue wildebeest, impala & red hartebeest, giraffe range remains unaffected – although giraffe<br />

may decline as a result of fewer large trees;<br />

Valuable woodl<strong>and</strong> ungulates (e.g. Roan & Sable) will no longer prosper in Etosha/Waterberg<br />

but will still be able to survive in Bwabwata, Mudumu <strong>and</strong> the adjacent conservancies (although<br />

may require extra fodder in dry years);<br />

Conditions in Caprivi will improve for White Rhino;<br />

Possible increase in wetl<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong> floodplain species although riparian forests are likely to have<br />

been reduced considerably by 2050 due to insufficient protection/increasing<br />

abstraction/pollution from more ambitious irrigation schemes/flood control measures;<br />

Elephant distribution may not be affected but they will exert increasing pressure on habitats;<br />

<br />

There will be increasing incidents of human-wildlife conflict.<br />

In addition to the direct responses summarised above, the northern regions of the country will<br />

experience the following secondary/ knock-on impacts as a result of the impacts of CC on farming<br />

systems <strong>and</strong> farm-based livelihoods:-<br />

<br />

<br />

A steady decline in rain-fed crop production. Increasing pestilence & higher incidence of crop<br />

failure<br />

A gradual decline in large livestock carrying capacity<br />

Higher irrigation water dem<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong> Increasing use of fertilisers <strong>and</strong> pesticides.<br />

These impacts, in turn, will result in:-<br />

Overgrazing <strong>and</strong> increasing rates of l<strong>and</strong> degradation <strong>and</strong> biodiversity loss ;<br />

<br />

<br />

Increasing competition <strong>and</strong> potential conflict over grazing, wildlife, veldkos <strong>and</strong> INPs which<br />

could lead to inter-conservancy conflict;<br />

Increased poaching in conservancies <strong>and</strong> parks;<br />

Increasing pressure on MET to allow access to parks for livestock grazing ;<br />

<br />

<br />

Increasing pollution <strong>and</strong> constraints on ecological reserves, water quality <strong>and</strong> biodiversity in the<br />

perennial rivers;<br />

Increasing rates of soil salinisation as a result of irrigation; <strong>and</strong><br />

USAID/NAMIBIA ENVIRONMENTAL THREATS AND OPPORTUNITIES ASSESSMENT 99

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!