06.01.2015 Views

usaid/nambia environmental threats and opportunities assessment

usaid/nambia environmental threats and opportunities assessment

usaid/nambia environmental threats and opportunities assessment

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

MAJOR THREAT 5. BUSH ENCROACHMENT<br />

It is estimated that 26 million hectares of rangel<strong>and</strong> is encroached with bush, at current prices leading to<br />

economic losses estimated at N$1.2 billion per year. Bush encroachment is therefore one of the most<br />

serious <strong>and</strong> costly forms of habitat degradation in Namibia.<br />

The Government recognizes that bush encroachment is causing a severe drain on rangel<strong>and</strong> productivity,<br />

but has not yet implemented measures to actively combat it. This is left up to individual farmers, who<br />

must carry the high cost of bush thinning. For many (especially on relatively small farms), it is<br />

unaffordable. Activities such as harvesting wood for charcoal production, firewood <strong>and</strong> fencing stakes,<br />

are helping farmers to derive financial benefits from encroacher wood so that the cost of clearing is<br />

offset.<br />

MAJOR THREAT 6. CLIMATE CHANGE<br />

The expected increasing temperatures, lower <strong>and</strong> more variable precipitation, higher rates of evaporation,<br />

<strong>and</strong> reduced soil moisture suggest that vegetation in Namibia will show a noticeable shift in spatial<br />

dominance from Grassy Savanna to Desert <strong>and</strong> Arid Shrubl<strong>and</strong> by 2080. The following important<br />

implications for agriculture <strong>and</strong> rangel<strong>and</strong>s are expected:<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

Arid vegetation types will increase in cover by about 20% by 2050, <strong>and</strong> up to 43% by 2080 in the<br />

absence of a CO 2 fertilization effect. 22 With CO 2 fertilization modelled, the expansion by 2080 is<br />

reduced from 43% to just under 30% (Midgely et al 2005).<br />

There will be a reduction in ground cover <strong>and</strong> reduced Net Primary Productivity throughout<br />

much of the country by 2050 (exacerbated by 2080).<br />

Rising atmospheric CO 2 could increase primary productivity in certain plants. This suggests that<br />

bush encroachment in some regions may intensify.<br />

A steady decline in rain-fed crop production will occur until this activity becomes no longer<br />

viable except in eastern Kavango <strong>and</strong> Caprivi.<br />

Much higher irrigation water dem<strong>and</strong>s, increased use of fertilizers <strong>and</strong> pesticides – the latter in<br />

response to increased pestilence <strong>and</strong> disease.<br />

Fewer but more intense rainfall episodes will result in increased rates of erosion. They will also<br />

have negative impacts on seed germination.<br />

Namibia’s long-term carrying capacity for large livestock is already exceeded in many places <strong>and</strong><br />

under climate change predictions a mean loss of 28% of livestock revenue below 2009 estimates<br />

can be expected by 2050 (Brown 2009).<br />

The productive area for large stock in Namibia will shrink towards the east <strong>and</strong> north <strong>and</strong> it is<br />

estimated that cattle numbers could decline to about 76% of present numbers by 2050 <strong>and</strong> 51%<br />

of present numbers by 2080 (ibid). Cattle will probably be replaced by small stock, which is better<br />

suited to arid conditions. The productive area for small stock will retreat from the west <strong>and</strong><br />

exp<strong>and</strong> towards the north <strong>and</strong> east. Despite an overall increase in productive range the numbers<br />

22 While there is considerable uncertainty pertaining to the CO2 fertilization effect on plants, higher CO2 could enhance the<br />

reduced dominance of Grassy Savanna by 2080 (by exacerbating the increase in C3-dominated vegetation types, Woody<br />

Savanna, Mixed Grassl<strong>and</strong>, <strong>and</strong> C3 Grassl<strong>and</strong>/Shrubl<strong>and</strong>) (Midgely, 2005)<br />

68 USAID/NAMIBIA ENVIRONMENTAL THREATS AND OPPORTUNITIES ASSESSMENT

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!