In vitro quantitation of Theileria parva sporozoites for use - TropMed ...
In vitro quantitation of Theileria parva sporozoites for use - TropMed ...
In vitro quantitation of Theileria parva sporozoites for use - TropMed ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
122 Chapter 9: General Discussion<br />
______________________________________________________________________________________________<br />
procedure than two step slow freezing and has potential <strong>for</strong> even higher yields <strong>of</strong> viable <strong>sporozoites</strong><br />
at resuscitation.<br />
9.4. Storage conditions<br />
The rate <strong>of</strong> stabilate infectivity loss upon storage on ice is minimal. This may allow delivery on this<br />
medium during immunisations. The loss rates were similar <strong>for</strong> glycerol and sucrose protected<br />
stabilates. <strong>In</strong> addition, we have shown that loss dynamics <strong>for</strong> Katete are similar to those <strong>of</strong> the<br />
Chitongo stock and can there<strong>for</strong>e speculate that ice storage can work <strong>for</strong> the southern province <strong>of</strong><br />
Zambia where Chitongo is <strong>use</strong>d. Caution should however be taken to include an in vivo assessment<br />
be<strong>for</strong>e implementation <strong>of</strong> the technique. Our attempt to store stabilates at -20°C resulted in high<br />
sporozoite infectivity loss. This method <strong>of</strong> short term storage there<strong>for</strong>e seems not to have a practical<br />
field application.<br />
Some disparities between glycerol and sucrose stabilates extracted from single tick batches were<br />
observed. Sucrose seemed to give consistently higher infectivities compared to glycerol, except in<br />
the case <strong>of</strong> the storage at -20°C where sucrose stabilates deteriorated faster than glycerol stabilates.<br />
Though there is strong evidence that sucrose stabilates had relatively higher infectivity, this may be<br />
a result <strong>of</strong> an interaction between the cryopreservatives and the target cells. It was further observed<br />
that some wells <strong>of</strong> higher concentration <strong>of</strong> glycerol stabilates gave false negatives (chapter 8). For<br />
these reasons, it is recommended that the comparative effects <strong>of</strong> these cryopreservatives on PBMC<br />
be assessed in <strong>vitro</strong>. Sucrose stabilates are at least as infective as glycerol stabilates in <strong>vitro</strong> and<br />
should there<strong>for</strong>e be assessed in vivo with the view <strong>of</strong> replacing glycerol which requires drop-wise<br />
addition during vaccine production.<br />
Resuscitation <strong>of</strong> lyophilised T. <strong>parva</strong> <strong>sporozoites</strong> was not achieved in this work. Although survival<br />
<strong>of</strong> lyophilisation is commonly limited to prokaryotic cells, this was once demonstrated <strong>for</strong> T. <strong>parva</strong><br />
(Marcotty et al., 2003). Since liquid nitrogen storage is very expensive and the I & T method is the<br />
only practical technique <strong>for</strong> immunising cattle at present, ef<strong>for</strong>ts at identifying cheaper storage<br />
methods should be continued. The various attempts made are a basis <strong>for</strong> trying other protocols and<br />
lyoprotectants. <strong>In</strong> this light, attempts at lyophilisation using cocktails <strong>of</strong> various lyoprotectants<br />
should be made, as long as the reagents do not make the vaccine too expensive <strong>for</strong> cattle keepers.