The SIRET Training Platform: Facing the Dropout Phenomenon of MOOC Environments Sergio Miranda, Giuseppina Rita Mangione, Francesco Orciuoli, Vincenzo Loia and Saverio Salerno During these processes, the exchanges and agencies will give them instruction on how to access MOMAMOOC and leave them to freely interact with the platform, using all available functionalities and services. The platform will track all activities related to the learning experiences and performance in terms of acquired competences. These details together with the information collected at the beginning of the process are useful to evaluate the real benefits of the proposed solution. The results of this experimental phase will be analysed and presented in future works. Acknowledgement Partially supported by the Italian Ministry of University and Research under the PON 01_03024 ‘SIRET, Recruiting and Training Integrated System’, project approved by D.D. 721/Ric 2011, October 14 and started in 2011, November 1. Special thanks to the other partners involved in these activities: CRMPA, Centro di Ricerca in Matematica Pura e Applicata, Fisciano (SA), Italy and MOMA S.p.A., Baronissi (SA), Italy. References Al-Yahya, M. (2011) OntoQue: A Question Generation Engine for Educational Assesment Based on Domain Ontologies Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT), 2011 11th IEEE International Conference on , vol., no., pp.393,395, 6-8 July 2011 Anderson, L. W., Krathwohl, D. R., & Bloom, B. S. (2005). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing. Longman. Ausubel, D. P. (1962). A subsumption theory of meaningful verbal learning and retention. Journal of General Psychology, 66(2), 213-224. Blaschke, M., L. (2012) Heutagogy and lifelong learning: A review of heutagogical practice and self- determined learning in IRRODL Vol 13, No 1 (2012) pp. 56-71. Bloom, B. S. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives. Handbook I: Cognitive Domain. New York: David McKay Company. Inc., 1956. 207 pp. Boven D. T, (2013) The Next Game Changer: The Historical Antecedents of the MOOC Movement in Education, eLearning Papers •n.33 • May 2013, pp. 1-7. N.Capuano, S.Miranda and F.Orciuoli “IWT: A Semantic Web-based Educational System”, G. Adorni, M. Coccoli (Eds.) Proceedings of the IV Workshop of the AI*IA Working Group on Artificial Intelligence & e-Learning held in conjunction with the XI International Conference of the Italian Association for Artificial Intelligence (AI*IA 2009), December 12, 2009, Reggio Emilia, Italy, pp. 11-16, AI*IA, 2009 [ISBN 978-889-035-811-1] Chapman, C., & King, R. (2005). Differentiated assessment strategies: One tool doesn’t fit all. Corwin Press. Clarke, T. (2013). The Advance of the MOOCs (Massive Open Online Courses): The Impending Globalisation of Business Education. Education+ Training,55(4/5), 6-6. Daniel, J. (2012). Making sense of MOOCs: Musings in a maze of myth, paradox and possibility. Journal of Interactive Media in Education, 3. M. Gaeta, F. Orciuoli, S. Paolozzi, and S. Salerno, (2011) Ontology extraction for knowledge reuse: The e- learning perspective. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part A, vol. 41, no. 4, pp. 798–809. Gregory, G. (Ed.). (2005). Differentiating instruction with style: Aligning teacher and learner intelligences for maximum achievement. Corwin-volume discounts. Holohan, E., Melia, M., McMullen, D., & Pahl, C. (2005). Adaptive e-learning content generation based on semantic web technology. Proceedings of Workshop on Applications of Semantic Web Technologies for e-Learning, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, pp. 29-36 Kolowich, S. (2013, March). The professors who make the MOOCs. Chronicle of Higher Education. Retrieved March 20, 2013, from http://chronicle.com/article/The-Professors-Behind-the- MOOC/137905/#id=overview. Lederman, D. (2013, February). Expanding pathways to MOOC credit. Inside Higher Education. Retrieved from http:// www.insidehighered.com/news/2013/02/07/ace-deems-5- massive-open-courses-worthy-credit. Mangione G. R., (2013) L’università che cambia. Tecnologie emergenti e prospettive educative. LECCE :PENSA EDITORE Miranda S., Mangione G. R., Orciuoli F., Gaeta M., Loia V. “Automatic Generation of Assessment Objects and Remedial Works for MOOCs”. Proc. Of ITHET 2013 Research Track |112
The SIRET Training Platform: Facing the Dropout Phenomenon of MOOC Environments Sergio Miranda, Giuseppina Rita Mangione, Francesco Orciuoli, Vincenzo Loia and Saverio Salerno Morris, L. V. (2013). MOOCs, Emerging Technologies, and Quality. Innovative Higher Education, 1-2 Mulwa, C., Lawless, S., Sharp, M., Arnedillo-Sanchez, I., & Wade, V. (2010, October). Adaptive educational hypermedia systems in technology enhanced learning: a literature review. In Proceedings of the 2010 ACM conference on Information technology education (pp. 73-84). ACM. Park, O. C., & Lee, J. (2003). Adaptive instructional systems. Educational Technology Research and Development, 25, 651-684. Siemens, Ray, and Susan Schreibman, eds. A companion to digital literary studies. Wiley. com, 2013. Sonwalker 2013 http://www.youtube. com/watchv=j4D44lVK6CY Tizzi, E. V. (2008). Dalla scholè allo schooling (Vol. 12). Morlacchi Editore. Vardi, Moshe Y. (November 2012). “Will MOOCs destroy academia”. Communications of the ACM 55 (11): 5. Retrieved 23 April 2013. Vazquez, J. M. M., Gonzalez‐Abril, L., Morente, F. V., & Ramirez, J. A. O. (2012). PERFORMANCE IMPROVEMENT USING ADAPTIVE LEARNING ITINERARIES. Computational Intelligence, 28(2), 234-260. Yuan, L., Powell, S. (2013) MOOCs and disruptive innovation: Implications for higher education, e-Learning Papers, ISSN: 1887-1542, www.elearningpapers.eu. n.33, May 2013, pp. 1-8. Zimmerman, B. J., & Schunk, D. H. (Eds.). (2013). Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: Theoretical perspectives. Routledge. Research Track |113
Change language