12.01.2015 Views

Volume 1 - Executive Summary - Office of the Chief Financial Officer

Volume 1 - Executive Summary - Office of the Chief Financial Officer

Volume 1 - Executive Summary - Office of the Chief Financial Officer

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Appendix E<br />

Current Services Funding Level (CSFL)<br />

Development<br />

Overview<br />

The Current Services Funding Level (CSFL) is a Local funds only representation <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> true cost <strong>of</strong> operating<br />

District agencies, before consideration <strong>of</strong> policy decisions. The CSFL reflects changes from <strong>the</strong> FY 2012 approved<br />

budget across multiple programs, and it estimates how much it would cost an agency to continue its current programs<br />

and operations into FY 2013. The FY 2013 CSFL adjustments to <strong>the</strong> FY 2012 Local funds budget are<br />

described in <strong>the</strong> FY 2012 Approved Budget to FY 2013 Proposed Budget, by Revenue Type table (Table 5) <strong>of</strong> nearly<br />

every District agency budget chapter.<br />

Methodology<br />

The starting point in estimating <strong>the</strong> required level <strong>of</strong> programmatic funding for <strong>the</strong> upcoming fiscal year (FY 2013)<br />

was <strong>the</strong> approved budget <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> current fiscal year (FY 2012). One-time expenditures in FY 2012 were removed<br />

from <strong>the</strong> calculation, since <strong>the</strong>y were assumed not to continue into FY 2013. There were several components within<br />

<strong>the</strong> approved budget that were considered basic to most agencies and required <strong>the</strong> application <strong>of</strong> a standard<br />

methodology. In <strong>the</strong>se instances, <strong>the</strong> same calculations were applied across all District agencies; however, some calculations<br />

were restricted only to a particular agency or a specific group <strong>of</strong> agencies and to applicable Comptroller<br />

Source Groups (CSGs) - that is, expenditure types, such as salaries, Fringe Benefits, Contracts, or Supplies. Finally,<br />

specific assumptions were applied to certain agencies, in some cases for known budget issues that were likely to<br />

recur, and in o<strong>the</strong>r cases, because characteristics were unique to <strong>the</strong> agency, such as <strong>the</strong> debt service agencies.<br />

General Assumptions Used to Develop <strong>the</strong> CSFL<br />

The following were <strong>the</strong> calculations for <strong>the</strong> general assumptions that were applied to nearly all District agencies in<br />

<strong>the</strong> FY 2013 CSFL:<br />

1. Removal <strong>of</strong> One-Time Items: All one-time items in <strong>the</strong> FY 2012 budget were removed from <strong>the</strong> FY 2013<br />

CSFL. Since <strong>the</strong>se costs were only approved for <strong>the</strong> current fiscal year and will not likely be applicable during<br />

<strong>the</strong> upcoming fiscal year, <strong>the</strong>y were not included in <strong>the</strong> CSFL.<br />

2. Personal Services Growth Factor: A 0.5 percent Year-over-Year (YoY) increase to all personal services costs<br />

(except Fringe Benefits) – In addition to certain step increases that were planned for FY 2012, step increases are<br />

FY 2013 Proposed Budget and <strong>Financial</strong> Plan<br />

Current Services Funding Level (CSFL) Development<br />

Appendix E-1

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!