16.01.2015 Views

Garnaut Fitzgerald Review of Commonwealth-State Funding

Garnaut Fitzgerald Review of Commonwealth-State Funding

Garnaut Fitzgerald Review of Commonwealth-State Funding

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

CHAPTER 13: <strong>Commonwealth</strong>–<strong>State</strong> Financial Relations<br />

for the 21 st Century<br />

13.3 The new model and<br />

intergovernmental issues<br />

The proposed model would be based on a new intergovernmental agreement, building<br />

on the 1999 Intergovernmental Agreement. The new intergovernmental agreement<br />

would set out the <strong>Commonwealth</strong>’s commitment to maintain grants to the two largest<br />

national programs and total payments to each <strong>State</strong> in real per capita terms. It would lay<br />

down the basic principles for operation <strong>of</strong> the three cooperative national programs.<br />

Ministerial Councils would develop specific agreements for the Health and Aged Care,<br />

Education and Training, and Indigenous Community Development Programs. They<br />

would specify multi-year objectives for the national programs and be reviewed annually.<br />

Multi-year rolling budgets and performance indicators would be identified, by which<br />

performance against objectives would be assessed.<br />

The agreement for each national program would also specify minimum service<br />

outcomes and an estimated minimum level <strong>of</strong> real per capita expenditure necessary to<br />

deliver that level <strong>of</strong> service. Each <strong>State</strong> would be required to achieve the agreed<br />

outcomes, sometimes partially specified in terms <strong>of</strong> minimum levels <strong>of</strong> services.<br />

However the <strong>State</strong>s would be free to achieve these outcomes and levels <strong>of</strong> service with<br />

the most cost-effective means available to them and without obligation to commit<br />

specified amounts <strong>of</strong> inputs. <strong>State</strong>s would also be free to provide services above the<br />

agreed minimum standard.<br />

The new approach would give effect to the objectives set out in the recent SPP<br />

Principles agreed by all the <strong>State</strong>s.<br />

In regard to education and training, existing bodies have roles in setting broad objectives<br />

to meet the needs <strong>of</strong> the community in areas such as access, choice, equity and<br />

excellence in schooling, and vocational preparation. The Australian National Training<br />

Authority is the <strong>Commonwealth</strong> statutory authority that currently provides a national<br />

focus for vocational education and training. The Australian National Training Authority<br />

administers national programs and the <strong>Commonwealth</strong> component <strong>of</strong> funding for the<br />

national vocational education and training system. It also plays an advisory role to the<br />

Ministerial Council <strong>of</strong> <strong>Commonwealth</strong>, <strong>State</strong> and Territory Ministers, which is responsible<br />

for vocational education and training. Under the new arrangements, the Ministerial<br />

Council for Education and Training would consider whether these established bodies<br />

would continue in the same or modified roles.<br />

FINAL REPORT [199]

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!