Garnaut Fitzgerald Review of Commonwealth-State Funding
Garnaut Fitzgerald Review of Commonwealth-State Funding
Garnaut Fitzgerald Review of Commonwealth-State Funding
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
CHAPTER 2: How the System Grew:<br />
A History <strong>of</strong> <strong>Commonwealth</strong> Grants to the <strong>State</strong>s<br />
In 1981 the CGC started conducting reviews and producing general revenue grant<br />
relativities reports. More noticeable changes to the HFE definition are evident from this<br />
time. The terms <strong>of</strong> reference for the first review, Report on <strong>State</strong> Tax Sharing<br />
Entitlements 1981, stated that the review should be:<br />
a) on the basis <strong>of</strong> the principle that the respective payments to which the<br />
<strong>State</strong>s are entitled under the Act should enable each <strong>State</strong> to provide, without<br />
imposing taxes and charges at levels appreciably different from the levels <strong>of</strong><br />
the taxes and charges imposed by the other <strong>State</strong>s, government services at<br />
standards not appreciably different from the standards <strong>of</strong> the government<br />
services provided by the other <strong>State</strong>s.<br />
b) taking account <strong>of</strong> differences in the capacities <strong>of</strong> the <strong>State</strong>s to raise<br />
revenues, and differences in the amounts required to be expected by the<br />
<strong>State</strong>s in providing comparable government services (CGC 1981, p. 5; italics<br />
added).<br />
Chapter 2 <strong>of</strong> the same report discussed the development <strong>of</strong> equalisation principles:<br />
The <strong>Commonwealth</strong> Grants Commission referred to its equalisation criterion<br />
as the principle <strong>of</strong> financial need. In fact, as applied by the Commission before<br />
1975, a claimant <strong>State</strong>’s financial need as interpreted by the Commission fell<br />
somewhat short <strong>of</strong> full fiscal equalisation… special grants received by a<br />
claimant <strong>State</strong> would not necessarily enable it to provide government services<br />
at standards comparable to those <strong>of</strong> the standard <strong>State</strong>s even if it imposed<br />
taxes and charges comparable to those <strong>of</strong> the standard <strong>State</strong>s (CGC 1981,<br />
p. 20; italics added).<br />
Chapter 2 also reported on current arrangements for assessing a claimant <strong>State</strong>’s<br />
financial needs:<br />
The foregoing description <strong>of</strong> the application <strong>of</strong> the fiscal equalisation principle<br />
to the assessment <strong>of</strong> a claimant <strong>State</strong>’s needs has been oversimplified… such<br />
a brief description cannot adequately convey the extent <strong>of</strong> the detailed<br />
examination by the Commission <strong>of</strong> the numerous problems and issues<br />
involved in the equalisation process (CGC 1981, p. 23)<br />
The terms <strong>of</strong> reference for the 1985 Report on Tax Sharing Relativities and 1988<br />
General Revenue Grant Relativities Report were almost identical to the 1981 wording:<br />
the Commission’s assessment should:<br />
a) be based on the application <strong>of</strong> the principle that the respective tax sharing<br />
grants to which the <strong>State</strong>s are entitled should enable each <strong>State</strong> to provide,<br />
without having to impose taxes and charges at levels appreciably different<br />
from the levels imposed by the other <strong>State</strong>s, government services at standards<br />
not appreciably different from the standards provided by the other <strong>State</strong>s; and<br />
b) take account <strong>of</strong> differences in the capacities <strong>of</strong> the <strong>State</strong>s to raise revenues;<br />
and differences in the amounts required to be expended by the <strong>State</strong>s in<br />
providing government services <strong>of</strong> a comparable standard (CGC 1985, p. 116,<br />
1988, p. xviii-xix; italics added).<br />
FINAL REPORT [34]