16.01.2015 Views

Garnaut Fitzgerald Review of Commonwealth-State Funding

Garnaut Fitzgerald Review of Commonwealth-State Funding

Garnaut Fitzgerald Review of Commonwealth-State Funding

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

CHAPTER 2: How the System Grew:<br />

A History <strong>of</strong> <strong>Commonwealth</strong> Grants to the <strong>State</strong>s<br />

In 1981 the CGC started conducting reviews and producing general revenue grant<br />

relativities reports. More noticeable changes to the HFE definition are evident from this<br />

time. The terms <strong>of</strong> reference for the first review, Report on <strong>State</strong> Tax Sharing<br />

Entitlements 1981, stated that the review should be:<br />

a) on the basis <strong>of</strong> the principle that the respective payments to which the<br />

<strong>State</strong>s are entitled under the Act should enable each <strong>State</strong> to provide, without<br />

imposing taxes and charges at levels appreciably different from the levels <strong>of</strong><br />

the taxes and charges imposed by the other <strong>State</strong>s, government services at<br />

standards not appreciably different from the standards <strong>of</strong> the government<br />

services provided by the other <strong>State</strong>s.<br />

b) taking account <strong>of</strong> differences in the capacities <strong>of</strong> the <strong>State</strong>s to raise<br />

revenues, and differences in the amounts required to be expected by the<br />

<strong>State</strong>s in providing comparable government services (CGC 1981, p. 5; italics<br />

added).<br />

Chapter 2 <strong>of</strong> the same report discussed the development <strong>of</strong> equalisation principles:<br />

The <strong>Commonwealth</strong> Grants Commission referred to its equalisation criterion<br />

as the principle <strong>of</strong> financial need. In fact, as applied by the Commission before<br />

1975, a claimant <strong>State</strong>’s financial need as interpreted by the Commission fell<br />

somewhat short <strong>of</strong> full fiscal equalisation… special grants received by a<br />

claimant <strong>State</strong> would not necessarily enable it to provide government services<br />

at standards comparable to those <strong>of</strong> the standard <strong>State</strong>s even if it imposed<br />

taxes and charges comparable to those <strong>of</strong> the standard <strong>State</strong>s (CGC 1981,<br />

p. 20; italics added).<br />

Chapter 2 also reported on current arrangements for assessing a claimant <strong>State</strong>’s<br />

financial needs:<br />

The foregoing description <strong>of</strong> the application <strong>of</strong> the fiscal equalisation principle<br />

to the assessment <strong>of</strong> a claimant <strong>State</strong>’s needs has been oversimplified… such<br />

a brief description cannot adequately convey the extent <strong>of</strong> the detailed<br />

examination by the Commission <strong>of</strong> the numerous problems and issues<br />

involved in the equalisation process (CGC 1981, p. 23)<br />

The terms <strong>of</strong> reference for the 1985 Report on Tax Sharing Relativities and 1988<br />

General Revenue Grant Relativities Report were almost identical to the 1981 wording:<br />

the Commission’s assessment should:<br />

a) be based on the application <strong>of</strong> the principle that the respective tax sharing<br />

grants to which the <strong>State</strong>s are entitled should enable each <strong>State</strong> to provide,<br />

without having to impose taxes and charges at levels appreciably different<br />

from the levels imposed by the other <strong>State</strong>s, government services at standards<br />

not appreciably different from the standards provided by the other <strong>State</strong>s; and<br />

b) take account <strong>of</strong> differences in the capacities <strong>of</strong> the <strong>State</strong>s to raise revenues;<br />

and differences in the amounts required to be expended by the <strong>State</strong>s in<br />

providing government services <strong>of</strong> a comparable standard (CGC 1985, p. 116,<br />

1988, p. xviii-xix; italics added).<br />

FINAL REPORT [34]

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!