16.01.2015 Views

Garnaut Fitzgerald Review of Commonwealth-State Funding

Garnaut Fitzgerald Review of Commonwealth-State Funding

Garnaut Fitzgerald Review of Commonwealth-State Funding

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

APPENDIX B: National Education and Training Program<br />

New approach<br />

<strong>Commonwealth</strong> funding for the new Education and Training Program would total around<br />

$7.2 billion in 2002–03. This is about 50 per cent <strong>of</strong> the available pool for the Health and<br />

Aged Care and Education and Training Programs.<br />

Establishing a broad education SPP would result in significant advantages, including:<br />

• improving effectiveness <strong>of</strong> service delivery<br />

• reducing administrative complexity<br />

• increased simplicity and transparency<br />

• increasing the <strong>State</strong>s’ ownership <strong>of</strong> education issues, encouraging them to deliver<br />

education outcomes rather than focusing on inputs<br />

• a more cooperative approach between the <strong>State</strong>s and the <strong>Commonwealth</strong>.<br />

Consolidating education SPPs will improve education outcomes. Increased policy<br />

flexibility will enable program requirements to be targeted at specific communities and<br />

allow policy choice to occur at community level, for example, by schools themselves. It<br />

will also improve efficiency, simplicity and transparency. In addition, equity outcomes<br />

could be targeted to suit local requirements.<br />

‘Through’ SPPs, which are simply passed by the <strong>State</strong>s to private institutions, will<br />

remain unchanged.<br />

As in the Health and Aged Care Program, a simple approach is suggested for the<br />

distribution <strong>of</strong> the Education and Training Program. Under the model, the Ministerial<br />

Council would agree indicators <strong>of</strong> need. As with health, simple and objective criteria<br />

should be used. The projections in Chapter 13 are based on the number <strong>of</strong> government<br />

school and publicly funded vocational education and training students in each <strong>State</strong>.<br />

Modification <strong>of</strong> a simple equal per capita distribution is recommended as there are<br />

important differences between <strong>State</strong>s that have an impact on demand for government<br />

schools and vocational education and training, including:<br />

• number <strong>of</strong> school-age children<br />

• proportion <strong>of</strong> students in government and non-government schools<br />

• participation rates in publicly funded vocational education and training courses.<br />

In determining the appropriate distribution, the Ministerial Council would need to<br />

consider how differences in the structure and number <strong>of</strong> years <strong>of</strong> school education<br />

provided by each <strong>State</strong> should be taken into account. For example, Queensland and<br />

Western Australia have twelve years <strong>of</strong> formal schooling, while all other <strong>State</strong>s have<br />

thirteen.<br />

FINAL REPORT [212]

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!