A Review of the Event Analysis of Systemic Teamwork Methodology

HFIDTC/WP1.1.3/10
Version 2/ 31 October 2005
Medians
Your overall acceptance of the methodology.
5
Please rate the overall ease of use of the methodology.
4
How open you perceive the methodology is to scrutiny
3
How well you think you carried out the EAST methodology
2
1
The breadth of coverage and its ability to describe a range of
behaviour.
How useful do you find the EAST methodology
How likely do you think the methodology is to produce consistent
results
Please rate the amount of resources (time & effort) required to
conduct an evaluation.
The extent to which the methodology has theoretical foundations.
Means
Your overall acceptance of the methodology.
5
Please rate the overall ease of use of the methodology.
4
How open you perceive the methodology is to scrutiny
3
How well you think you carried out the EAST methodology
2
1
The breadth of coverage and its ability to describe a range of
behaviour.
How useful do you find the EAST methodology
How likely do you think the methodology is to produce consistent
results
Please rate the amount of resources (time & effort) required to
conduct an evaluation.
The extent to which the methodology has theoretical foundations.
Standard Deviations
Your overall acceptance of the methodology.
2
Please rate the overall ease of use of the methodology.
1.5
How open you perceive the methodology is to scrutiny
1
How well you think you carried out the EAST methodology
0.5
0
The breadth of coverage and its ability to describe a range of
behaviour.
How useful do you find the EAST methodology
How likely do you think the methodology is to produce consistent
results
Please rate the amount of resources (time & effort) required to
conduct an evaluation.
The extent to which the methodology has theoretical foundations.
Figure 7-4 - Holistic Review of EAST
105