23.01.2015 Views

A Review of the Event Analysis of Systemic Teamwork Methodology

A Review of the Event Analysis of Systemic Teamwork Methodology

A Review of the Event Analysis of Systemic Teamwork Methodology

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

HFIDTC/WP1.1.3/10<br />

Version 2/ 31 October 2005<br />

Table 11 - CDM Phase 2: Deal with switching requests<br />

Goal Specification<br />

Cue identification<br />

Expectancy<br />

Conceptual Model<br />

Uncertainty<br />

Information<br />

Situation<br />

Awareness<br />

Situation<br />

Assessment<br />

Options<br />

Stress<br />

Choice<br />

Analogy<br />

Obtain confirmation from NOC that planned isolation is still required.<br />

Approaching time for planned isolation.<br />

Switching phone rings throughout building.<br />

Airblast circuit breakers (accompanied by sirens) can be heard to<br />

operate remotely (more so in Barking 275 than Barking C 132).<br />

Yes – routine planned work according to fixed procedures.<br />

Wokingham have performed remote isolations already.<br />

Circuit configured ready for local isolation.<br />

Physical verification <strong>of</strong> apparatus always required (DBI – don’t<br />

believe it).<br />

Proceduralised information from NOC – circuit, location, time, actions<br />

required etc.<br />

Switching log.<br />

Switching log.<br />

Physical status <strong>of</strong> apparatus.<br />

Planning documentation.<br />

Visual or verbal information from substation personnel.<br />

Planning documentation used only occasionally<br />

Refusal <strong>of</strong> switching request.<br />

Additional conditions to switching request.<br />

Some time pressure.<br />

Yes – highly proceduralised anyway<br />

Yes – routine activity<br />

17

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!