A Review of the Event Analysis of Systemic Teamwork Methodology
A Review of the Event Analysis of Systemic Teamwork Methodology
A Review of the Event Analysis of Systemic Teamwork Methodology
- No tags were found...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
HFIDTC/WP1.1.3/10<br />
Version 2/ 31 October 2005<br />
Table 11 - CDM Phase 2: Deal with switching requests<br />
Goal Specification<br />
Cue identification<br />
Expectancy<br />
Conceptual Model<br />
Uncertainty<br />
Information<br />
Situation<br />
Awareness<br />
Situation<br />
Assessment<br />
Options<br />
Stress<br />
Choice<br />
Analogy<br />
Obtain confirmation from NOC that planned isolation is still required.<br />
Approaching time for planned isolation.<br />
Switching phone rings throughout building.<br />
Airblast circuit breakers (accompanied by sirens) can be heard to<br />
operate remotely (more so in Barking 275 than Barking C 132).<br />
Yes – routine planned work according to fixed procedures.<br />
Wokingham have performed remote isolations already.<br />
Circuit configured ready for local isolation.<br />
Physical verification <strong>of</strong> apparatus always required (DBI – don’t<br />
believe it).<br />
Proceduralised information from NOC – circuit, location, time, actions<br />
required etc.<br />
Switching log.<br />
Switching log.<br />
Physical status <strong>of</strong> apparatus.<br />
Planning documentation.<br />
Visual or verbal information from substation personnel.<br />
Planning documentation used only occasionally<br />
Refusal <strong>of</strong> switching request.<br />
Additional conditions to switching request.<br />
Some time pressure.<br />
Yes – highly proceduralised anyway<br />
Yes – routine activity<br />
17