A Review of the Event Analysis of Systemic Teamwork Methodology

More documents

Recommendations

Info

HFIDTC/WP1.1.3/10 Version 2/ 31 October 2005 Gas Insulated Circuit Breakers Airblast Notices/Locks NOC Check Open Lock &Caution Location SystemState Certificates Isolation Control Engineer Open Lock & Caution Accept Instructions Switching Wokingham Shutters Time Dressed Log Sheet Procedures Rear Refuse Switching Log Displays Front Earth Switches Isolators WE1000 Points of Isolation Open Busbar Circuits Electrical Contacts Closed Phone Current Voltage Faulty DBI Indication Switching Phone Equipment Lables Identity SAP Substations Figure 3-7 – Propositional Network for CDM phase two Gas Insulated Circuit Breakers Airblast Notices/Locks NOC Check Open Lock &Caution Location SystemState Certificates Isolation Control Engineer Open Lock & Caution Accept Instructions Switching Wokingham Shutters Time Dressed Log Sheet Procedures Rear Refuse Switching Log Displays Front Earth Switches Isolators WE1000 Points of Isolation Open Busbar Circuits Electrical Contacts Closed Phone Current Voltage Faulty DBI Indication Switching Phone Equipment Lables Identity SAP Substations Figure 3-8 – Propositional Network for CDM phase three 21
HFIDTC/WP1.1.3/10 Version 2/ 31 October 2005 Gas Insulated Circuit Breakers Airblast Notices/Locks NOC Check Open Lock & Caution Location SystemState Certificates Isolation Control Engineer Open Lock & Caution Accept Instructions Switching Wokingham Shutters Time Dressed Log Sheet Procedures Rear Refuse Switching Log Displays Front Earth Switches Isolators WE1000 Points of Isolation Open Busbar Circuits Electrical Contacts Closed Phone Current Voltage Faulty DBI Indication Switching Phone Equipment Lables Identity SAP Substations Figure 3-9 – Propositional Network for CDM phase four The results from the EAST analysis indicate that the key nodes in the Barking scenario network were the NOC operator and the SAP at Barking substation. The majority of the communications observed occurred between the NOC and the SAP, and the operational loading figures indicate that the SAP at Barking conducted the majority of the work required, on instruction from the NOC operator. Over half of all the tasks involved were identified as teamwork tasks, and a medium level of co-ordination was calculated between the agents involved. The EAST analysis indicated that NOC operator assumes the role of commander during the scenario, and all work is undertaken only on his instruction. Advantages • The EAST approach offers an exhaustive analysis of C4i activity. Activity is analysed using a number of different approaches, ensuring that a comprehensive analysis of the scenario under analysis is achieved. • The EAST output is extremely useful, offering a number of different analyses and perspectives on the C4i activity in question. Each component method offers a different representation or analysis of the C4i activity observed. For example, the SNA provides an indication of the key agents within the scenario and identifies communication links, the CDA identifies teamwork tasks and provides a co-ordination rating for each teamwork task step, and the propositional network component identifies the ideal knowledge (i.e. SA) required for effective task performance. 22
Page 1 and 2: Analysing C4i Activity: A Review of
Page 3 and 4: HFIDTC/WP1.1.3/10 Version 2/ 31 Oct
Page 23: HFIDTC/WP1.1.3/10 Version 2/ 31 Oct
Page 75 and 76:
HFIDTC/WP1.1.3/10 Version 2/ 31 Oct
Page 77 and 78:
Page 79 and 80:
Page 81 and 82:
Page 83 and 84:
Page 85 and 86:
Page 87 and 88:
Page 89 and 90:
Page 91 and 92:
Page 93 and 94:
Page 95 and 96:
Page 97 and 98:
Page 99 and 100:
Page 101 and 102:
Page 103 and 104:
Page 105 and 106:
Page 107 and 108:
Page 109 and 110:
Page 111 and 112:
Page 113:
show all

A Review of the Event Analysis of Systemic Teamwork Methodology

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?