13.11.2012 Views

Update on UKCS Field Development Projects - Intsok

Update on UKCS Field Development Projects - Intsok

Update on UKCS Field Development Projects - Intsok

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Field</strong><br />

Maureen Redevelopment<br />

Area Central North Sea<br />

Operator Fairfield<br />

<strong>Development</strong> c<strong>on</strong>cept Subsea<br />

Transport c<strong>on</strong>cept Pipeline – 21 km to Andrew or 14 km to Varg<br />

Start-up 2011/12?<br />

Comments: Fairfield’s 16/29a-17 appraisal well <strong>on</strong> Maureen North-East last year failed to find<br />

commercial quantities of hydrocarb<strong>on</strong>s. This may spell the end of redevelopment plans - the<br />

company said it would have to evaluate whether it still had a commercial project <strong>on</strong> its hands.<br />

This process was still under way in Mar. <strong>Development</strong> was previously planned to begin with<br />

Maureen North-East, which was believed to hold an estimated 27m bbl of oil in place, together<br />

with the underlying Morag reservoir. Funding of the well was largely taken <strong>on</strong> by Endeavour<br />

and Challenger Minerals under a farm-in deal. Fairfield also sees potential in the nearby Mary<br />

and Mabel fields – Mary has already been in producti<strong>on</strong> while Mabel is an undeveloped<br />

discovery. Fairfield’s preferred development soluti<strong>on</strong> was subsea facilities tied back either to<br />

BP’s Andrew hub or Talisman’s Varg in the Norwegian sector. Stand-al<strong>on</strong>e mobile soluti<strong>on</strong>s<br />

were also evaluated. Maureen was originally developed by Phillips; it ceased producti<strong>on</strong> in<br />

1999 when 226m bbl had been produced.<br />

<strong>Field</strong> M<strong>on</strong>kwell<br />

Area Southern North Sea<br />

Operator Dana<br />

<strong>Development</strong> c<strong>on</strong>cept Subsea<br />

Transport c<strong>on</strong>cept 10km pipeline to Cleet<strong>on</strong>?<br />

Start-up 2011<br />

Comments: Dana seems to be c<strong>on</strong>fident of developing the small M<strong>on</strong>kwell gas field – it has<br />

ordered a subsea tree and c<strong>on</strong>trol system from DrilQuip which the supplier put <strong>on</strong> display at<br />

Offshore Europe last year. Start-up is scheduled for 2011. But first comes a crucial appraisal<br />

well, which jackup GSF Labrador looks like spudding in May. Assuming the well is successful,<br />

M<strong>on</strong>kwell will be developed as a subsea tieback to a nearby host – an agreement has been<br />

reached with the host, according to Dana. The leading candidate appears to be Cleet<strong>on</strong>, some<br />

10 km to the south-east, which already hosts several satellites.<br />

www.intsok.com<br />

| 33

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!