04.02.2015 Views

Report on Mandatory Sentences - Law Reform Commission

Report on Mandatory Sentences - Law Reform Commission

Report on Mandatory Sentences - Law Reform Commission

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

(b)<br />

England and Wales<br />

2.154 In 2002 the Government published a White Paper entitled Justice for All. 352 The purpose of the<br />

White Paper was to “send the clearest possible message to those committing offences that the criminal<br />

justice system is united in ensuring their detecti<strong>on</strong>, c<strong>on</strong>victi<strong>on</strong> and punishment.” 353 It incorporated many<br />

of the recommendati<strong>on</strong>s c<strong>on</strong>tained in the 2001 Halliday <str<strong>on</strong>g>Report</str<strong>on</strong>g>, 354 which had examined whether the<br />

sentencing framework in England and Wales could be changed to improve results, especially by reducing<br />

crime, at justifiable expense. While neither the 2002 White Paper nor the 2001 Halliday <str<strong>on</strong>g>Report</str<strong>on</strong>g> referred<br />

to mandatory sentencing for firearm offences, there was a sense that a public appetite for a stricter<br />

approach to sentencing existed. 355<br />

2.155 During a House of Comm<strong>on</strong>s debate in late 2002, 356 the then Home Secretary was asked<br />

whether he was aware of the aim of the L<strong>on</strong>d<strong>on</strong> Metropolitan Police to get the minimum sentence for<br />

carrying a weap<strong>on</strong> raised to five years. He resp<strong>on</strong>ded that he was aware of representati<strong>on</strong>s having been<br />

made and commented that “[t]here is good reas<strong>on</strong> for treating the issue seriously and c<strong>on</strong>sidering<br />

whether we should add it to the Criminal Justice and Sentencing Bill.” 357 He was later to rely <strong>on</strong> this<br />

statement as having been an indicati<strong>on</strong> of his intenti<strong>on</strong> to introduce minimum sentences for gun crime<br />

from December 2002. 358<br />

2.156 In the United Kingdom, however, firearms legislati<strong>on</strong> has, for the most part, resulted from<br />

reacti<strong>on</strong>ary resp<strong>on</strong>ses to specific tragic events. In a 2006 Home Office <str<strong>on</strong>g>Report</str<strong>on</strong>g>, for instance, it was noted<br />

that:<br />

“Since the mid-1980s, a number of significant changes have occurred to the legislative and public<br />

policy resp<strong>on</strong>ses to gun crime and firearms more generally. Automatic weap<strong>on</strong>s having been<br />

banned by the Firearms Act 1937, semi-automatic rifles were banned by the Firearms<br />

(Amendment) Act 1988 after the massacre of 16 people in Hungerford in 1987. Then a ban <strong>on</strong><br />

handguns was introduced by the Firearms (Amendment) Act 1997. This followed the Cullen<br />

Inquiry … into the 1996 school massacre in Dunblane, Scotland, in which 16 children and a<br />

teacher were shot and killed. Both the Hungerford and Dunblane massacres were committed by<br />

l<strong>on</strong>e gunmen with legally owned firearms. The UK now has some of the most restrictive firearm<br />

laws in Europe ...” 359<br />

2.157 In January 2003 two teenage girls, Charlene Ellis and Latisha Shakespear, were shot dead as<br />

they stood outside a New Year’s party in Ast<strong>on</strong>, Birmingham. 360 The incident was c<strong>on</strong>sidered to be<br />

indicative of a rising gun culture in England and Wales. 361 This was c<strong>on</strong>firmed by Home Office figures<br />

352<br />

353<br />

354<br />

355<br />

356<br />

357<br />

358<br />

359<br />

360<br />

361<br />

Justice for All Cm 5563 (Home Office, 2002).<br />

Ibid at 11.<br />

Making Punishments Work: <str<strong>on</strong>g>Report</str<strong>on</strong>g> of a Review of the Sentencing Framework for England and Wales (Home<br />

Office, 2001).<br />

Justice for All (Home Office, Cm 5563, 2002) at paragraph 5.2.<br />

Hansard, House of Comm<strong>on</strong>s, Oral Answers to Questi<strong>on</strong>s, 2 December 2002, Column 594.<br />

Ibid. Even before the provisi<strong>on</strong>s regarding mandatory minimum sentences were inserted, the Criminal Justice<br />

Bill had been widely criticised by civil liberties’ groups. See: Tempest “Blunkett’s Bill under Fire” The<br />

Guardian 21 November 2002.<br />

Sparrow “Blunkett outlaws Use of Fake Guns” The Telegraph 6 January 2003; Vasagar and Ward “Five-Year<br />

Jail Terms planned as Rise in Use of Illegal Weap<strong>on</strong>s revealed” The Guardian 6 January 2003; and “Blunkett<br />

c<strong>on</strong>firms tough new Gun Penalties” The Guardian 6 January 2003.<br />

Hales, Lewis and Silverst<strong>on</strong>e Gun Crime: The Market in and Use of illegal Firearms Research Study 298<br />

(Home Office, 2006) at 7.<br />

Oliver “Birmingham Shooting Victims Named” The Guardian 3 January 2003.<br />

Burke, Thomps<strong>on</strong>, Bright, Hinsliff, Barnett and Rowan “Where the Gun rules and the Innocent go in Fear” The<br />

Guardian 5 January 2003.<br />

84

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!