Report on Mandatory Sentences - Law Reform Commission
Report on Mandatory Sentences - Law Reform Commission
Report on Mandatory Sentences - Law Reform Commission
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
(b)<br />
Judicial recommendati<strong>on</strong> at sentencing stage<br />
3.77 The Commissi<strong>on</strong> now turns to c<strong>on</strong>sider how the mandatory sentencing regime for murder<br />
could be reformed by the introducti<strong>on</strong> of a judicial power to recommend a minimum term to be served.<br />
3.78 As discussed at paragraph 3.15ff, in Northern Ireland, a mandatory life sentence for murder is<br />
prescribed by secti<strong>on</strong> 1(1) of the Northern Ireland (Emergency Provisi<strong>on</strong>s) Act 1973. Article 5 of the Life<br />
<strong>Sentences</strong> (Northern Ireland) Order 2001 requires that where a court imposes a life sentence, it must<br />
specify the minimum period that must be served by the offender “to satisfy the requirements of retributi<strong>on</strong><br />
and deterrence,” before he or she becomes eligible for parole. 129 Where the offence is particularly<br />
serious, the court may order a “whole life tariff” if it c<strong>on</strong>siders that the offender should be detained for the<br />
remainder of his or her natural life. 130 In calculating the minimum term to be served by an offender, the<br />
Northern Ireland Court of Appeal, in R v Candless, 131 directed the courts to have regard to the guidance<br />
provided by Lord Woolf LJ in his 2002 Practice Statement (Crime: Life <strong>Sentences</strong>). The Practice<br />
Statement (as discussed at paragraph 3.18) sets out the starting points, and the circumstances in which<br />
each starting point applies, and also outlines the factors which tend to aggravate or mitigate the durati<strong>on</strong><br />
of the minimum term.<br />
3.79 As discussed at paragraph 2.12, in England and Wales, secti<strong>on</strong> 1(1) of the Murder (Aboliti<strong>on</strong> of<br />
the Death Penalty) Act 1965 provides for a mandatory life sentence for murder. Under secti<strong>on</strong> 269 of the<br />
Criminal Justice Act 2003, a court is required, when imposing a life sentence, to make an order specifying<br />
the minimum term to be served by the offender before he or she may be c<strong>on</strong>sidered for release by the<br />
Parole Board. 132 Where the court is of the opini<strong>on</strong> that, because of the seriousness of the offence, no<br />
such order should be made, it must order that the early release provisi<strong>on</strong>s are not to apply to the<br />
offender. 133 As to how to calculate a minimum term, Schedule 21 of the Criminal Justice Act 2003 (as<br />
discussed at paragraph 3.23ff) sets out the starting points, the circumstances which dictate which starting<br />
point applies, and the factors which tend to aggravate or mitigate the durati<strong>on</strong> of the minimum term. The<br />
Commissi<strong>on</strong> c<strong>on</strong>siders that the approach adopted in Northern Ireland is preferable to the more<br />
prescriptive legislative model established in England and Wales, under which the appropriate starting<br />
points are specified by the Criminal Justice Act 2003.<br />
3.80 In the view of the Commissi<strong>on</strong>, the Northern Irish experience illustrates the benefits of<br />
permitting sentencing courts to pr<strong>on</strong>ounce <strong>on</strong> the relative culpability of c<strong>on</strong>victed murderers. Cases such<br />
as R v Howell 134 and R v Stewart 135 (discussed above at paragraphs 3.19 and 3.20) dem<strong>on</strong>strate that this<br />
approach enables the courts to incorporate elements of the principles of proporti<strong>on</strong>ality and c<strong>on</strong>sistency<br />
when sentencing the offence of murder. Furthermore, where courts are afforded scope to acknowledge<br />
the various aggravating and mitigating factors which may characterise murder cases, this plays an<br />
important role in maintaining public c<strong>on</strong>fidence in the sentencing process.<br />
3.81 The Commissi<strong>on</strong> also c<strong>on</strong>siders that permitting sentencing courts to pr<strong>on</strong>ounce <strong>on</strong> the relative<br />
culpability of c<strong>on</strong>victed murderers may reduce two problems associated with the current early release<br />
arrangements for murder. The first problem relates to the factors c<strong>on</strong>sidered by the Parole Board and<br />
the Minister for Justice in assessing whether an offender is suitable for release. As discussed at<br />
paragraph 3.13, in performing this role, the Parole Board and the Minister for Justice take into account a<br />
number of factors that are comparable, though not identical, to those c<strong>on</strong>sidered in the sentencing<br />
129<br />
130<br />
131<br />
132<br />
133<br />
134<br />
135<br />
Article 5(1) and Article 5(2) of the Life <strong>Sentences</strong> (Northern Ireland) Order 2001.<br />
Article 5(3) of the Life <strong>Sentences</strong> (Northern Ireland) Order 2001.<br />
R v Candless [2004] NI 269.<br />
Secti<strong>on</strong> 269(1) and Secti<strong>on</strong> 269(2) of the Criminal Justice Act 2003.<br />
Secti<strong>on</strong> 269(4) of the Criminal Justice Act 2003.<br />
R v Howell [2010] NICC 48.<br />
R v Stewart [2011] NICC 10.<br />
123