Report on Mandatory Sentences - Law Reform Commission
Report on Mandatory Sentences - Law Reform Commission
Report on Mandatory Sentences - Law Reform Commission
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
which captured adverse public attenti<strong>on</strong>, 9 including the case of Edith Thomps<strong>on</strong> and her lover, Frederick<br />
Bywaters, in 1923 10 and the case of George St<strong>on</strong>er and his lover, Alma Rattenbury, in 1935. 11<br />
2.05 A number of attempts were made to abolish the death penalty. In 1929, a Select Committee <strong>on</strong><br />
Capital Punishment recommended the suspensi<strong>on</strong> of the death penalty for a trial period of five years. 12 In<br />
1938, the House of Comm<strong>on</strong>s carried an amendment to the abortive Criminal Justice Bill 1938 which<br />
sought to abolish the death penalty entirely. 13 In 1948, the House of Comm<strong>on</strong>s carried an amendment to<br />
the Criminal Justice Bill 1948 which again sought to suspend the death penalty for a period of five<br />
years. 14 This was reversed by the House of Lords and, at report stage, a back-bencher, Sydney<br />
Silverman, tabled an amendment to the same effect. 15 Each attempt failed.<br />
2.06 In 1949, a Royal Commissi<strong>on</strong> <strong>on</strong> Capital Punishment, the Gowers Commissi<strong>on</strong>, was established<br />
to c<strong>on</strong>sider whether liability to suffer capital punishment for murder should be limited or modified and, if<br />
so, to what extent or by what means. 16 In its 1953 <str<strong>on</strong>g>Report</str<strong>on</strong>g>, 17 the Gowers Commissi<strong>on</strong> made a number of<br />
recommendati<strong>on</strong>s including that the statutory age limit for the death penalty should be raised from 18 to<br />
21 years; that discreti<strong>on</strong> should be given to the jury to decide whether to impose the death penalty or a<br />
life sentence; that degrees of murder should not be established; and that the M’Naghten rules governing<br />
the insanity defence should be reformed. 18 It has been asserted that the report had a limited impact <strong>on</strong><br />
policy-makers as its most significant recommendati<strong>on</strong>s were subsequently rejected by the government. 19<br />
2.07 In spite of this setback, those in favour of aboliti<strong>on</strong> c<strong>on</strong>tinued to campaign. They were spurred <strong>on</strong><br />
not least by three c<strong>on</strong>troversial cases which raised c<strong>on</strong>siderable doubt about the fairness and infallibility<br />
of the law relating to murder. 20 The first case was that of Timothy Evans who was hanged in 1950 for the<br />
murder of his baby daughter, Geraldine, while a count relating to the murder of his wife, Beryl, was left <strong>on</strong><br />
file. 21 It later transpired that a neighbour turned Crown Prosecuti<strong>on</strong> witness, John Christie, was<br />
8<br />
9<br />
10<br />
11<br />
12<br />
13<br />
14<br />
15<br />
16<br />
17<br />
18<br />
19<br />
20<br />
21<br />
Infanticide Act 1938.<br />
Morris Crime and Criminal Justice since 1945 (Blackwell, 1989) at 78.<br />
Weis “Not Innocent, Not Guilty; Edith Thomps<strong>on</strong> was an adulterer, a woman c<strong>on</strong>sorting below her class. But<br />
was that reas<strong>on</strong> enough to hang her for murder” The Guardian 10 November 1993.<br />
Joseph “The wife, her teenage lover and a brutal murder that became a Cause Celebre” Bournemouth Echo<br />
24 April 2011.<br />
Dawtry “The Aboliti<strong>on</strong> of the Death Penalty in Britain” (1966) 6 Brit J Criminology 183 at 188.<br />
Ibid.<br />
Ibid at 189; and Morris Crime and Criminal Justice since 1945 (Blackwell, 1989) at 78-80.<br />
Dawtry “The Aboliti<strong>on</strong> of the Death Penalty in Britain” (1966) 6 Brit J Criminology 183 at 189; and Morris Crime<br />
and Criminal Justice since 1945 (Blackwell, 1989) at 78-80.<br />
Smith “The Penalty for Murder” (1988) 19 Cambrian <strong>Law</strong> Review 5 at 5. Morris asserts that the Government<br />
was careful to set the Commissi<strong>on</strong>’s terms of reference so as to preclude any c<strong>on</strong>siderati<strong>on</strong> of aboliti<strong>on</strong> itself<br />
(see: Morris Crime and Criminal Justice since 1945 (Blackwell, 1989) at 80).<br />
<str<strong>on</strong>g>Report</str<strong>on</strong>g> of the Royal Commissi<strong>on</strong> <strong>on</strong> Capital Punishment 1949-1953 (HMSO, Cmnd 8932, 1953); Morris Crime<br />
and Criminal Justice since 1945 (Blackwell, 1989) at 80; and Dessi<strong>on</strong> “The Gowers <str<strong>on</strong>g>Report</str<strong>on</strong>g> and Capital<br />
Punishment” (1954) 29 NYU L Rev 1061.<br />
Shute “Punishing Murders: Release Procedures and the ‘Tariff’, 1953-2004” [2004] Crim LR 873 at 874; and<br />
Morris Crime and Criminal Justice since 1945 (Blackwell, 1989) at 81.<br />
Shute “Punishing Murders: Release Procedures and the ‘Tariff’, 1953-2004” [2004] Crim LR 873 at 874.<br />
Morris Crime and Criminal Justice since 1945 (Blackwell, 1989) at 81.<br />
R (<strong>on</strong> the applicati<strong>on</strong> of Westlake) v Criminal Cases Review Commissi<strong>on</strong> [2004] EWHC 2779 (Admin); Morris<br />
Crime and Criminal Justice since 1945 (Blackwell, 1989) at 81-83; Prior “Timothy Evans Family’s 60-Year<br />
C<strong>on</strong>victi<strong>on</strong> Wait” BBC News 9 March 2010. Available at: http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/wales/8556721.stm [Last<br />
44