Report on Mandatory Sentences - Law Reform Commission
Report on Mandatory Sentences - Law Reform Commission
Report on Mandatory Sentences - Law Reform Commission
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
operates retrospectively in so far as offences committed prior to its enactment may c<strong>on</strong>stitute ‘strikes’ <strong>on</strong><br />
the record of the offender where they are comparable to any of the designated offences. 65 Federal<br />
c<strong>on</strong>victi<strong>on</strong>s from other states may also qualify where they relate to c<strong>on</strong>duct similar to that entailed by a<br />
designated offence. 66 The Act stipulates that at least <strong>on</strong>e of the prior c<strong>on</strong>victi<strong>on</strong>s must have occurred<br />
before the commissi<strong>on</strong> by the offender of any of the other designated offences. 67<br />
5.43 Austin et. al assert that Washingt<strong>on</strong> is representative of most other states in that its law<br />
produced a relatively narrow strike z<strong>on</strong>e and requires three strikes in order for a mandatory life sentence<br />
to apply. 68 The Commissi<strong>on</strong> notes, however, that Washingt<strong>on</strong> does impose a ‘two-strikes’ law up<strong>on</strong><br />
certain repeat sex offenders. This regime applies to those who are c<strong>on</strong>victed of a specified sexual<br />
offence, 69 the commissi<strong>on</strong> of which was preceded by at least <strong>on</strong>e c<strong>on</strong>victi<strong>on</strong> (whether in the state or<br />
elsewhere) for another specified sexual offence or for a federal offence, out-of-state offence, or offence<br />
under prior Washingt<strong>on</strong> law, which is comparable to a specified sexual offence. 70 Where subject to this<br />
‘two-strikes’ law, an offender must be sentenced to life in pris<strong>on</strong> without parole. 71<br />
5.44 It has been observed that low-level offenders have been most affected by the ‘three-strikes’<br />
sentencing regime enacted in Washingt<strong>on</strong>. 72 In particular, commentators have highlighted the fact that<br />
sec<strong>on</strong>d degree robbery is the most comm<strong>on</strong> ‘third-strike’ offence. 73 As this offence poses little risk of<br />
physical injury, some commentators, including the Washingt<strong>on</strong> Sentencing Guidelines Commissi<strong>on</strong>, have<br />
recommended that this offence (al<strong>on</strong>g with certain forms of sec<strong>on</strong>d degree assault) be removed from the<br />
list of designated ‘strike’ offences. 74<br />
rape and sexual exploitati<strong>on</strong>), and vehicular offences (including certain forms of vehicular homicide and<br />
vehicular assault).<br />
64<br />
65<br />
66<br />
67<br />
68<br />
69<br />
70<br />
71<br />
72<br />
73<br />
74<br />
RCW 9.94A.570 specifies that a mandatory life sentence without the possibility of release is the penalty<br />
applicable to ‘persistent offenders’ (as defined by RCW 9.94A.030, see below).<br />
RCW 9.94A.030, at paragraph (32), sub-paragraph (u).<br />
Ibid.<br />
RCW 9.94A.030, paragraph (37)(a)(ii).<br />
Austin, Clark, Hardyman and Henry Three Strikes and You’re Out: The Implementati<strong>on</strong> and Impact of Strike<br />
<strong>Law</strong>s (Nati<strong>on</strong>al Criminal Justice Reference Service, 2000) at 15.<br />
RCW 9.94A.030, paragraph (37), sub-paragraph (b)(i) lists the relevant sexual offences as follows: (a) rape in<br />
the first degree; (b) rape of a child in the first degree; (c) child molestati<strong>on</strong> in the first degree; (d) rape in the<br />
sec<strong>on</strong>d degree; (e) rape of a child in the sec<strong>on</strong>d degree; and (e) indecent liberties by forcible compulsi<strong>on</strong>.<br />
Where a finding of sexual motivati<strong>on</strong> is made, the following offences also qualify: (a) murder in the first<br />
degree; (b) murder in the sec<strong>on</strong>d degree; (c) homicide by abuse; (d) kidnapping in the first degree; (e)<br />
kidnapping in the sec<strong>on</strong>d degree; (f) assault in the first degree; (g) assault in the sec<strong>on</strong>d degree; (h) assault of<br />
a child in the first degree; (i) assault of a child in the sec<strong>on</strong>d degree; (j) burglary in the first degree; and (k) an<br />
attempt to commit any of the foregoing crimes.<br />
RCW 9.94A.030, paragraph (37)(b)(i) and paragraph (37)(b)(ii).<br />
RCW 9.94A.570.<br />
O’Hagan “Three-strikes life terms fewer than expected” Seattle Times 17 August 2004.<br />
Ibid; and McCarthy Recent Developments <strong>on</strong> Washingt<strong>on</strong>’s “Three Strikes” <strong>Law</strong> (Office of Legislative<br />
Research, 2009).<br />
McCarthy Recent Developments <strong>on</strong> Washingt<strong>on</strong>’s “Three Strikes” <strong>Law</strong> (Office of Legislative Research, 2009);<br />
Shapiro “Life in Pris<strong>on</strong> for Stealing $48: Rethinking Sec<strong>on</strong>d-Degree Robbery as a Strike Offense in<br />
Washingt<strong>on</strong> State” (2010-2011) 34(3) Seattle University <strong>Law</strong> Review 935; and Lee and Colgan Washingt<strong>on</strong>'s<br />
Three Strikes <strong>Law</strong>: Public Safety & Cost Implicati<strong>on</strong>s of Life Without Parole (Columbia Legal Services, 2011).<br />
194