04.02.2015 Views

Report on Mandatory Sentences - Law Reform Commission

Report on Mandatory Sentences - Law Reform Commission

Report on Mandatory Sentences - Law Reform Commission

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

offences became extremely unpopular. 242 In resp<strong>on</strong>se, C<strong>on</strong>gress passed the Comprehensive Drug<br />

Abuse Preventi<strong>on</strong> and C<strong>on</strong>trol Act 1970 which repealed virtually all of the mandatory sentencing<br />

provisi<strong>on</strong>s applicable to drugs offences. 243<br />

2.113 It has been noted, however, that this did not reflect a general policy disfavouring mandatory<br />

sentencing as, in the same year, mandatory sentencing provisi<strong>on</strong>s were enacted for certain offences<br />

involving firearms and explosives. 244 This might have been due to the fact that the late 1960s and early<br />

1970s bore witness to diminishing support for the rehabilitative model of impris<strong>on</strong>ment and a<br />

corresp<strong>on</strong>ding renewal of interest in mandatory sentences. 245 Under the rehabilitative model, the Parole<br />

Board, <strong>on</strong> the basis of an assessment of the offender’s level of rehabilitati<strong>on</strong>, had ultimate discreti<strong>on</strong><br />

regarding the grant of release. Critics observed that, as a c<strong>on</strong>sequence, many offenders deemed not to<br />

have been sufficiently rehabilitated, served sentences that were disproporti<strong>on</strong>ately l<strong>on</strong>g and/or disparate<br />

by comparis<strong>on</strong> to the sentences served by others c<strong>on</strong>victed of the same or similar offences. In additi<strong>on</strong>,<br />

they observed that the efficacy of rehabilitative treatments was in doubt and that it was thus unfair to<br />

make release dependent <strong>on</strong> rehabilitati<strong>on</strong>. In an effort to address these issues, legislators sought to<br />

make sentencing more structured by means of mandatory sentencing provisi<strong>on</strong>s, am<strong>on</strong>g other<br />

initiatives. 246<br />

2.114 On the state level, this trend began in New York with the enactment of the Rockefeller Drug <strong>Law</strong>s<br />

in 1973. This legislati<strong>on</strong> prescribed a mandatory life sentence for the sale or possessi<strong>on</strong> of small<br />

amounts of narcotic drugs al<strong>on</strong>g with mandatory minimum terms of impris<strong>on</strong>ment ranging from <strong>on</strong>e to 25<br />

years. 247 In 1978, Michigan enacted harsh mandatory sentences for drugs offences, including the<br />

notorious “650 Lifer <strong>Law</strong>”. 248 This law prescribed a mandatory life sentence without parole for offenders<br />

c<strong>on</strong>victed of delivering over 650 grammes of heroin or cocaine. 249 By 1983, 49 out of 50 states had<br />

enacted similar mandatory sentencing provisi<strong>on</strong>s.<br />

242<br />

243<br />

244<br />

245<br />

246<br />

247<br />

248<br />

249<br />

Mascharka “<strong>Mandatory</strong> Minimum <strong>Sentences</strong>: Exemplifying the <strong>Law</strong> of Unintended C<strong>on</strong>sequences” (2001)<br />

Florida State University <strong>Law</strong> Review 935 at 939; <str<strong>on</strong>g>Report</str<strong>on</strong>g> to C<strong>on</strong>gress: <strong>Mandatory</strong> Minimum Penalties in the<br />

Federal Criminal Justice System (United States Sentencing Commissi<strong>on</strong>, 2011) at 22; Special <str<strong>on</strong>g>Report</str<strong>on</strong>g> to<br />

C<strong>on</strong>gress: <strong>Mandatory</strong> Minimum Penalties in the Federal Criminal Justice System (United States Sentencing<br />

Commissi<strong>on</strong>, 1991) at Chapter 2; and Lutjen “Culpability and Sentencing under <strong>Mandatory</strong> Minimums and the<br />

Federal Sentencing Guidelines: The Punishment no l<strong>on</strong>ger fits the Crime” (1996) 10 Notre Dame JL Ethics &<br />

Pub Pol’y 389 at 396. See also: Glick “<strong>Mandatory</strong> Sentencing: The Politics of the New Criminal Justice”<br />

(1979) 43 Fed Probati<strong>on</strong> 3.<br />

See also: Glick “<strong>Mandatory</strong> Sentencing: The Politics of the New Criminal Justice” (1979) 43 Fed Probati<strong>on</strong> 3.<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>Report</str<strong>on</strong>g> to C<strong>on</strong>gress: mandatory Minimum Penalties in the Federal Criminal Justice System (United States<br />

Sentencing Commissi<strong>on</strong>, 2011) at 23.<br />

Glick “<strong>Mandatory</strong> Sentencing: The Politics of the New Criminal Justice System” (1979) 43 Fed Probati<strong>on</strong> 3 at<br />

3-6; Zimring “Sentencing <strong>Reform</strong> in the States: Some Sobering Less<strong>on</strong>s from the 1970s” (1981-1982) 2 N Ill U<br />

L Rev 1 at 2-4; and Special <str<strong>on</strong>g>Report</str<strong>on</strong>g> to C<strong>on</strong>gress: <strong>Mandatory</strong> Minimum Penalties in the Federal Criminal Justice<br />

System (United States Sentencing Commissi<strong>on</strong>, 1991) at Chapter 2.<br />

Special <str<strong>on</strong>g>Report</str<strong>on</strong>g> to C<strong>on</strong>gress: <strong>Mandatory</strong> Minimum Penalties in the Federal Criminal Justice System (United<br />

States Sentencing Commissi<strong>on</strong>, 1991) at Chapter 2.<br />

Bayer “The Effects of the 1973 Drug <strong>Law</strong>s <strong>on</strong> the New York State Courts: A Comment” (1976) 5<br />

C<strong>on</strong>temporary Drug Problems 631 at 631-632; and Glanville “Drug Abuse, <strong>Law</strong> Abuse, and the Eighth<br />

Amendment: New York’s 1973 Drug Legislati<strong>on</strong> and the Prohibiti<strong>on</strong> against Cruel and Unusual Punishment”<br />

(1974-1975) 60 Cornell L Rev 638 at 639.<br />

See: “Background <strong>on</strong> Michigan mandatory minimum drug law reforms”. Available at:<br />

www.famm.org/state/Michigan.aspx [Last accessed: 22 May 2013].<br />

In 1987, Michigan introduced mandatory c<strong>on</strong>secutive sentencing provisi<strong>on</strong>s which provided that a sentence for<br />

a drug offence had to be served c<strong>on</strong>secutively to any other sentence being served for a fel<strong>on</strong>y. See:<br />

www.famm.org/state/Michigan.aspx [Last accessed: 22 May 2013].<br />

72

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!