04.02.2015 Views

Report on Mandatory Sentences - Law Reform Commission

Report on Mandatory Sentences - Law Reform Commission

Report on Mandatory Sentences - Law Reform Commission

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

circumstances parole’ under the Corrective Services Act 2006). 94 In South Australia, the court must set a<br />

standard n<strong>on</strong>-parole period of 20 years when it imposes a life sentence for murder. 95 The court may<br />

decline to set a n<strong>on</strong>-parole period if, having regard to the gravity of the offence, the criminal record and<br />

behaviour of the offender, and any other circumstances, it c<strong>on</strong>siders that it would be inappropriate. In<br />

Western Australia, the court must set a standard n<strong>on</strong>-parole period of 10 years where the offender has<br />

been sentenced to life impris<strong>on</strong>ment for murder. 96<br />

(6) New Zealand<br />

3.40 In New Zealand, secti<strong>on</strong> 102 of the Sentencing Act 2002 provides that life impris<strong>on</strong>ment is the<br />

presumptive penalty for murder. Thus, a pers<strong>on</strong> c<strong>on</strong>victed of murder must be sentenced to life<br />

impris<strong>on</strong>ment unless the circumstances of the offence and the offender would render such a sentence<br />

“manifestly unjust”. 97 Secti<strong>on</strong> 86E(2) of the 2002 Act provides that the court must impose a life sentence<br />

where the murder is a stage-2 or stage-3 offence 98 and must order that the life sentence be served<br />

without parole unless the circumstances of the offence and the offender would render such a sentence<br />

“manifestly unjust”.<br />

3.41 Secti<strong>on</strong> 84 of the Parole Act 2002 provides that offenders serving life sentences will become<br />

eligible for parole <strong>on</strong>ce they have served 10 years’ impris<strong>on</strong>ment, unless the sentencing court has<br />

ordered a “n<strong>on</strong>-parole period”. 99 If a n<strong>on</strong>-parole period has been ordered, offenders become eligible for<br />

parole <strong>on</strong>ce they have served that period. Secti<strong>on</strong> 60 of the Parole Act 2002 provides that an applicati<strong>on</strong><br />

may be made to the Parole Board to recall an offender who is <strong>on</strong> parole or compassi<strong>on</strong>ate release. This<br />

may be d<strong>on</strong>e where the offender poses “an undue risk” to the community, has breached a c<strong>on</strong>diti<strong>on</strong> of<br />

release or has committed an offence punishable by impris<strong>on</strong>ment. 100 In additi<strong>on</strong> to parole, secti<strong>on</strong> 41 of<br />

the Parole Act 2002 provides that the Parole Board may grant compassi<strong>on</strong>ate release to any pris<strong>on</strong>er<br />

who has just given birth or is seriously ill and unlikely to recover. 101<br />

(7) United States of America<br />

3.42 In the United States of America, the majority of states have retained the death penalty for either<br />

first degree murder or “capital murder”. All of these states require the jury to find that any mitigating<br />

factors are outweighed by certain aggravating factors. 102 In the event that this is not the case or, indeed,<br />

the death penalty is not sought by the prosecuti<strong>on</strong>, these states provide for less severe sancti<strong>on</strong>s such as<br />

life impris<strong>on</strong>ment with or without parole. The few remaining states have abolished the death penalty and<br />

instead require the impositi<strong>on</strong> of determinate sentences or life sentences with or without parole. 103<br />

94<br />

95<br />

96<br />

97<br />

98<br />

99<br />

100<br />

101<br />

102<br />

103<br />

Secti<strong>on</strong> 305(4) of the Criminal Code, as inserted by secti<strong>on</strong> 3 of the Criminal <strong>Law</strong> Amendment Act 2012.<br />

Secti<strong>on</strong> 32 of the Criminal <strong>Law</strong> (Sentencing) Act 1988 (SA).<br />

Secti<strong>on</strong> 90 of the Sentencing Act 1995 (WA), as amended by secti<strong>on</strong> 19 of the Criminal <strong>Law</strong> Amendment<br />

(Homicide) Act 2008.<br />

Secti<strong>on</strong> 102(1) of the Sentencing Act 2002.<br />

See: secti<strong>on</strong> 86A to secti<strong>on</strong> 86I of the Sentencing Act 2002 regarding the classificati<strong>on</strong> of offences as “stage-<br />

1”, “stage-2” and “stage-3” offences; the recording of judicial warnings; and the additi<strong>on</strong>al c<strong>on</strong>sequences for<br />

repeat serious violent offending.<br />

Secti<strong>on</strong> 84 of the Parole Act 2002 regarding “n<strong>on</strong>-parole periods”.<br />

Secti<strong>on</strong> 61 of the Parole Act 2002.<br />

Secti<strong>on</strong> 41(1) of the Parole Act 2002.<br />

Finkelstein “<str<strong>on</strong>g>Report</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>on</strong> Basic Aspects of the <strong>Law</strong> of Murder in the United States: The Examples of California<br />

and New York” in The <strong>Law</strong> of Murder: Overseas Comparative Studies (<strong>Law</strong> Commissi<strong>on</strong>, 2005) at 107.<br />

Alaska (1957); C<strong>on</strong>necticut (2012); Hawaii (1957); Illinois (2011); Iowa (1965); Maine (1887); Massachusetts<br />

(1984); Michigan (1846); Minnesota (1911); New Jersey (2007); New Mexico (2009); New York (2007); North<br />

Dakota (1973); Rhode Island (1984); Verm<strong>on</strong>t (1964); West Virginia (1965); Wisc<strong>on</strong>sin (1853); and District of<br />

Columbia (1981). See: the website of The Death Penalty Informati<strong>on</strong> Center, www.deathpenaltyinfo.org;<br />

115

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!