Report on Mandatory Sentences - Law Reform Commission
Report on Mandatory Sentences - Law Reform Commission
Report on Mandatory Sentences - Law Reform Commission
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
should apply. Thus, it has been noted that an early guilty plea merits more credit than a late guilty plea 51<br />
and that an accused who voluntarily pleads guilty will be given more credit than an accused who pleads<br />
guilty having been caught red-handed. 52<br />
4.33 The Court of Criminal Appeal has, however, cauti<strong>on</strong>ed against treating a guilty plea, in and of<br />
itself, as an excepti<strong>on</strong>al and specific circumstance. In The People (DPP) v Ducque, 53 the Court observed:<br />
“First of all there is nothing excepti<strong>on</strong>al about a plea of guilty, it is <strong>on</strong>e of the comm<strong>on</strong>est<br />
occurrences in any criminal trial. Sec<strong>on</strong>dly, it seems to be at least implied in the judgment of this<br />
court delivered by Hardiman J in Botha ... that importance must be attached to the c<strong>on</strong>junctive<br />
‘and, if so’ in the statutory provisi<strong>on</strong> so that a plea of guilty can <strong>on</strong>ly be relevant to an escape from<br />
the mandatory minimum sentence if there are other circumstances which effectively can render<br />
the combinati<strong>on</strong> of the plea of guilty and those circumstances to be excepti<strong>on</strong>al circumstances.<br />
These can include the stage at which the accused indicated the intenti<strong>on</strong> to plead guilty, the<br />
circumstances in which the indicati<strong>on</strong> was given and whether that pers<strong>on</strong> materially assisted in<br />
the investigati<strong>on</strong> of the offence.”<br />
Thus, the courts will, more often than not, c<strong>on</strong>sider a guilty plea in additi<strong>on</strong> to other factors such as<br />
material assistance. 54 The courts may also c<strong>on</strong>sider whether there is some additi<strong>on</strong>al factor which<br />
endows the guilty plea with excepti<strong>on</strong>ality, such as where it is particularly early, 55 lightens the workload of<br />
the courts or assists the prosecuti<strong>on</strong>’s case. 56<br />
4.34 While a guilty plea may result in the impositi<strong>on</strong> of a sentence lower than the presumptive<br />
minimum, an accused who pleads “not guilty” will not automatically receive a sentence of at least 10<br />
years. 57 Similarly, it has been noted that an accused who decides to plead ‘not guilty’ should not be<br />
penalised with a more severe sentence. 58<br />
4.35 In a 2001 Department of Justice report, 59 McEvoy c<strong>on</strong>cluded that secti<strong>on</strong> 27 of the Misuse of<br />
Drugs Act 1977 had been reas<strong>on</strong>ably successful in its operati<strong>on</strong> in so far as it had encouraged a very<br />
high rate of guilty pleas. During the period November 1999 to May 2001, in all but <strong>on</strong>e of 55 cases, the<br />
accused had pleaded guilty. This he attributed to the fact that a c<strong>on</strong>victi<strong>on</strong> following a “not guilty” plea<br />
51<br />
52<br />
53<br />
54<br />
55<br />
56<br />
57<br />
58<br />
59<br />
See: The People (DPP) v Godspeed Court of Criminal Appeal 13 July 2009; The People (DPP) v Coles [2009]<br />
IECCA 144; The People (DPP) v Brodigan [2008] IECCA 127; and The People (DPP) v Benjamin Court of<br />
Criminal Appeal 14 January 2002.<br />
The People (DPP) v Delaney [2010] IECCA 57; The People (DPP) v Anders<strong>on</strong> [2010] IECCA 46; The People<br />
(DPP) v Keogh [2009] IECCA 128; The People (DPP) v Nels<strong>on</strong> Court of Criminal Appeal 31 July 2008; The<br />
People (DPP) v Kinahan [2008] IECCA 5; The People (DPP) v Lernihan [2007] IECCA 21; The People (DPP)<br />
v Ducque [2005] IECCA 92; The People (DPP) v Galligan Court of Criminal Appeal 23 July 2003; The People<br />
(DPP) v Henry Court of Criminal Appeal 15 May 2002; and The People (DPP) v Orm<strong>on</strong>de [2011] IECCA 46.<br />
The People (DPP) v Ducque [2005] IECCA 92.<br />
See: The People (DPP) v Renald Court of Criminal Appeal 23 November 2001; The People (DPP) v McGrane<br />
[2010] IECCA 8; The People (DPP) v Kinahan; [2008] IECCA 5; The People (DPP) v Howard and McGrath<br />
Court of Criminal Appeal 29 July 2005; The People (DPP) v Botha Court of Criminal Appeal 19 January 2004;<br />
The People (DPP) v Galligan Court of Criminal Appeal 23 July 2003; The People (DPP) v Alexiou [2003] 3 IR<br />
513; The People (DPP) v Benjamin Court of Criminal Appeal 14 January 2002; and The People (DPP) v<br />
Hogarty Court of Criminal Appeal 21 December 2001.<br />
The People (DPP) v Dermody [2007] 2 IR 622.<br />
The People (DPP) v Farrell [2010] IECCA 116.<br />
Smith “Sentencing Secti<strong>on</strong> 15A Offences” (2010) 20(1) ICLJ 8; and The People (DPP) v Duffy Court of<br />
Criminal Appeal 21 December 2001. See also: The People (DPP) v Malric [2011] IECCA 99.<br />
The People (DPP) v Shekale [2008] IECCA 28; and The People (DPP) v Byrne [2012] IECCA 72.<br />
McEvoy Research for the Department of Justice <strong>on</strong> the Criteria applied by the Courts in sentencing under<br />
s.15A of the Misuse of Drugs Act 1977 (as amended) (Department of Justice, 2001).<br />
135