Report on Mandatory Sentences - Law Reform Commission
Report on Mandatory Sentences - Law Reform Commission
Report on Mandatory Sentences - Law Reform Commission
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
sentence bey<strong>on</strong>d the normal length or, in limited circumstances, bey<strong>on</strong>d the statutory maximum where,<br />
having regard to the defendant’s record, it was c<strong>on</strong>sidered that this was necessary to protect the public.<br />
However, the courts so<strong>on</strong> found that the extended sentence was being imposed for relatively minor<br />
offences. In additi<strong>on</strong>, it has been noted that at no time did the extended sentence play a significant role in<br />
sentencing. 445<br />
2.187 Secti<strong>on</strong> 37 of the Criminal Justice Act 1967 was replaced by secti<strong>on</strong> 28 of the Powers of Criminal<br />
Courts Act 1973, a statute which c<strong>on</strong>solidated the law <strong>on</strong> sentencing. 446 This, in turn, was repealed by<br />
the Powers of Criminal Courts (Sentencing) Act 2000.<br />
2.188 In 1997, the Crimes (<strong>Sentences</strong>) Act 1997 was enacted. Secti<strong>on</strong> 2 of the 1997 Act, a provisi<strong>on</strong><br />
which was severely criticised during its life, 447 required the impositi<strong>on</strong> of a life sentence, except in<br />
excepti<strong>on</strong>al circumstances, <strong>on</strong> offenders who had been c<strong>on</strong>victed of a sec<strong>on</strong>d serious offence. Secti<strong>on</strong> 2<br />
was replaced by secti<strong>on</strong> 109 of the Powers of Criminal Courts (Sentencing) Act 2000, a statute which<br />
c<strong>on</strong>solidated the law <strong>on</strong> sentencing. 448 In 2000, the Court of Appeal effectively neutralised the “two<br />
strikes” rule when it ruled that <strong>on</strong>ly in excepti<strong>on</strong>al circumstances could judges take into account whether<br />
the offender presented a danger to the public. 449<br />
2.189 In the 2001 Halliday <str<strong>on</strong>g>Report</str<strong>on</strong>g>, it was observed that the public were frustrated by a criminal justice<br />
system which it perceived to be treating “dangerous, violent, sexual and other serious offenders”<br />
leniently. 450 As noted at paragraph 2.154, the Government’s 2002 White Paper Justice for All 451<br />
incorporated many of the recommendati<strong>on</strong>s c<strong>on</strong>tained in the 2001 Halliday <str<strong>on</strong>g>Report</str<strong>on</strong>g>. 452 This, in turn,<br />
inspired the Criminal Justice Act 2003.<br />
2.190 Secti<strong>on</strong> 303 of the Criminal Justice Act 2003 repealed 109 of the Powers of Criminal Courts<br />
(Sentencing) Act 2000. 453 However, the 2003 Act also established a new sentencing provisi<strong>on</strong> for public<br />
protecti<strong>on</strong>. Secti<strong>on</strong> 225 of the 2003 Act required the courts to impose a life sentence for a serious<br />
offence 454 where they were of the opini<strong>on</strong> that there was a significant risk that the offender would commit<br />
further offences causing serious harm to members of the public if released. If the offence was <strong>on</strong>e in<br />
respect of which the offender would, apart from secti<strong>on</strong> 225, be liable to life impris<strong>on</strong>ment, and the court<br />
c<strong>on</strong>sidered that the seriousness of the offence, or the offence and <strong>on</strong>e or more offences associated with<br />
it, was such as to justify the impositi<strong>on</strong> of a sentence of life impris<strong>on</strong>ment, the court was required to<br />
impose a sentence of life impris<strong>on</strong>ment. Where an offence was serious but did not attract a life sentence<br />
or the current offence was not sufficiently serious, the court was required to impose an indeterminate<br />
sentence of impris<strong>on</strong>ment for public protecti<strong>on</strong> (IPP sentence). Secti<strong>on</strong> 226 created a similar sentence<br />
for offenders under 18 years of age.<br />
2.191 Ashworth and Player were highly critical of secti<strong>on</strong> 225 and its neighbouring provisi<strong>on</strong>s:<br />
445<br />
446<br />
447<br />
448<br />
449<br />
450<br />
451<br />
452<br />
453<br />
454<br />
Ashworth Sentencing and Criminal Justice (Butterworths, 3 rd ed, 2000) at 161.<br />
Current <strong>Law</strong> Statutes (Sweet & Maxwell, 1973).<br />
Henham “Making Sense of the Crime (<strong>Sentences</strong>) Act 1997” (1998) 61 Mod L Rev 223 at 224-225.<br />
The Powers of Criminal Courts (Sentencing) Act 2000 was enacted pursuant to the recommendati<strong>on</strong>s of the<br />
<strong>Law</strong> Commissi<strong>on</strong> and the Scottish <strong>Law</strong> Commissi<strong>on</strong> c<strong>on</strong>tained in the 2000 <str<strong>on</strong>g>Report</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>on</strong> the C<strong>on</strong>solidati<strong>on</strong> of<br />
Legislati<strong>on</strong> relating to Sentencing Cm 4626 SE/2000/15.<br />
Dyer “Ruling neutralises ‘Two Strikes’ <strong>Law</strong>” The Guardian 10 November 2000.<br />
Justice for All (Home Office, Cm 5563, 2002) at paragraph 5.2.<br />
Justice for All Cm 5563 (Home Office, 2002).<br />
Making Punishments Work: <str<strong>on</strong>g>Report</str<strong>on</strong>g> of a Review of the Sentencing Framework for England and Wales (Home<br />
Office, 2001).<br />
<strong>Mandatory</strong> <strong>Sentences</strong> of Impris<strong>on</strong>ment in Comm<strong>on</strong> <strong>Law</strong> Jurisdicti<strong>on</strong>s (Department of Justice, Canada) at 14.<br />
The term “serious offence” is defined by secti<strong>on</strong> 224(2) of the Criminal Justice Act 2003.<br />
93