04.02.2015 Views

Report on Mandatory Sentences - Law Reform Commission

Report on Mandatory Sentences - Law Reform Commission

Report on Mandatory Sentences - Law Reform Commission

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

sentence bey<strong>on</strong>d the normal length or, in limited circumstances, bey<strong>on</strong>d the statutory maximum where,<br />

having regard to the defendant’s record, it was c<strong>on</strong>sidered that this was necessary to protect the public.<br />

However, the courts so<strong>on</strong> found that the extended sentence was being imposed for relatively minor<br />

offences. In additi<strong>on</strong>, it has been noted that at no time did the extended sentence play a significant role in<br />

sentencing. 445<br />

2.187 Secti<strong>on</strong> 37 of the Criminal Justice Act 1967 was replaced by secti<strong>on</strong> 28 of the Powers of Criminal<br />

Courts Act 1973, a statute which c<strong>on</strong>solidated the law <strong>on</strong> sentencing. 446 This, in turn, was repealed by<br />

the Powers of Criminal Courts (Sentencing) Act 2000.<br />

2.188 In 1997, the Crimes (<strong>Sentences</strong>) Act 1997 was enacted. Secti<strong>on</strong> 2 of the 1997 Act, a provisi<strong>on</strong><br />

which was severely criticised during its life, 447 required the impositi<strong>on</strong> of a life sentence, except in<br />

excepti<strong>on</strong>al circumstances, <strong>on</strong> offenders who had been c<strong>on</strong>victed of a sec<strong>on</strong>d serious offence. Secti<strong>on</strong> 2<br />

was replaced by secti<strong>on</strong> 109 of the Powers of Criminal Courts (Sentencing) Act 2000, a statute which<br />

c<strong>on</strong>solidated the law <strong>on</strong> sentencing. 448 In 2000, the Court of Appeal effectively neutralised the “two<br />

strikes” rule when it ruled that <strong>on</strong>ly in excepti<strong>on</strong>al circumstances could judges take into account whether<br />

the offender presented a danger to the public. 449<br />

2.189 In the 2001 Halliday <str<strong>on</strong>g>Report</str<strong>on</strong>g>, it was observed that the public were frustrated by a criminal justice<br />

system which it perceived to be treating “dangerous, violent, sexual and other serious offenders”<br />

leniently. 450 As noted at paragraph 2.154, the Government’s 2002 White Paper Justice for All 451<br />

incorporated many of the recommendati<strong>on</strong>s c<strong>on</strong>tained in the 2001 Halliday <str<strong>on</strong>g>Report</str<strong>on</strong>g>. 452 This, in turn,<br />

inspired the Criminal Justice Act 2003.<br />

2.190 Secti<strong>on</strong> 303 of the Criminal Justice Act 2003 repealed 109 of the Powers of Criminal Courts<br />

(Sentencing) Act 2000. 453 However, the 2003 Act also established a new sentencing provisi<strong>on</strong> for public<br />

protecti<strong>on</strong>. Secti<strong>on</strong> 225 of the 2003 Act required the courts to impose a life sentence for a serious<br />

offence 454 where they were of the opini<strong>on</strong> that there was a significant risk that the offender would commit<br />

further offences causing serious harm to members of the public if released. If the offence was <strong>on</strong>e in<br />

respect of which the offender would, apart from secti<strong>on</strong> 225, be liable to life impris<strong>on</strong>ment, and the court<br />

c<strong>on</strong>sidered that the seriousness of the offence, or the offence and <strong>on</strong>e or more offences associated with<br />

it, was such as to justify the impositi<strong>on</strong> of a sentence of life impris<strong>on</strong>ment, the court was required to<br />

impose a sentence of life impris<strong>on</strong>ment. Where an offence was serious but did not attract a life sentence<br />

or the current offence was not sufficiently serious, the court was required to impose an indeterminate<br />

sentence of impris<strong>on</strong>ment for public protecti<strong>on</strong> (IPP sentence). Secti<strong>on</strong> 226 created a similar sentence<br />

for offenders under 18 years of age.<br />

2.191 Ashworth and Player were highly critical of secti<strong>on</strong> 225 and its neighbouring provisi<strong>on</strong>s:<br />

445<br />

446<br />

447<br />

448<br />

449<br />

450<br />

451<br />

452<br />

453<br />

454<br />

Ashworth Sentencing and Criminal Justice (Butterworths, 3 rd ed, 2000) at 161.<br />

Current <strong>Law</strong> Statutes (Sweet & Maxwell, 1973).<br />

Henham “Making Sense of the Crime (<strong>Sentences</strong>) Act 1997” (1998) 61 Mod L Rev 223 at 224-225.<br />

The Powers of Criminal Courts (Sentencing) Act 2000 was enacted pursuant to the recommendati<strong>on</strong>s of the<br />

<strong>Law</strong> Commissi<strong>on</strong> and the Scottish <strong>Law</strong> Commissi<strong>on</strong> c<strong>on</strong>tained in the 2000 <str<strong>on</strong>g>Report</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>on</strong> the C<strong>on</strong>solidati<strong>on</strong> of<br />

Legislati<strong>on</strong> relating to Sentencing Cm 4626 SE/2000/15.<br />

Dyer “Ruling neutralises ‘Two Strikes’ <strong>Law</strong>” The Guardian 10 November 2000.<br />

Justice for All (Home Office, Cm 5563, 2002) at paragraph 5.2.<br />

Justice for All Cm 5563 (Home Office, 2002).<br />

Making Punishments Work: <str<strong>on</strong>g>Report</str<strong>on</strong>g> of a Review of the Sentencing Framework for England and Wales (Home<br />

Office, 2001).<br />

<strong>Mandatory</strong> <strong>Sentences</strong> of Impris<strong>on</strong>ment in Comm<strong>on</strong> <strong>Law</strong> Jurisdicti<strong>on</strong>s (Department of Justice, Canada) at 14.<br />

The term “serious offence” is defined by secti<strong>on</strong> 224(2) of the Criminal Justice Act 2003.<br />

93

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!