04.02.2015 Views

Report on Mandatory Sentences - Law Reform Commission

Report on Mandatory Sentences - Law Reform Commission

Report on Mandatory Sentences - Law Reform Commission

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

4.145 The offence of producing a substance listed in Schedule II 310 (other than marijuana) attracts a<br />

minimum sentence of <strong>on</strong>e year if the producti<strong>on</strong> is for the purpose of trafficking. 311 A minimum sentence<br />

of 18 m<strong>on</strong>ths applies if the producti<strong>on</strong> is for the purpose of trafficking and if any of the aggravating factors<br />

listed in secti<strong>on</strong> 7(3) of the Act (as outlined at paragraph 4.144) apply. 312 Where the subject matter of the<br />

offence is cannabis, the Act prescribes minimum sentences ranging from six m<strong>on</strong>ths to three years. The<br />

applicable minimum sentence is determined by the number of plants produced and whether any of the<br />

aggravating factors listed in secti<strong>on</strong> 7(3) of the Act are present. 313<br />

4.146 Secti<strong>on</strong> 10 of the C<strong>on</strong>trolled Drugs and Substances Act provides that a court may delay<br />

sentencing an offender c<strong>on</strong>victed of any of the foregoing offences in order to enable the offender to<br />

participate in a drug treatment court program approved by the Attorney General, or to attend a treatment<br />

program approved by the province under the supervisi<strong>on</strong> of the court. If the offender successfully<br />

completes such a program, the court is not required to impose the prescribed minimum sentence.<br />

4.147 Dupuis observes that vigorous debate surrounded the introducti<strong>on</strong> of these minimum<br />

sentences. 314 On <strong>on</strong>e side, it was argued that mandatory sentencing for drug offences: (i) addresses the<br />

(perceived) problem of judges prioritising the rehabilitati<strong>on</strong> of offenders over crime deterrence and the<br />

right of law-abiding citizens to go about their lives without fear; (ii) destroys the criminal infrastructure that<br />

keeps the crime cycle going; (iii) encourages addicts to choose drug treatment programmes rather than<br />

go to pris<strong>on</strong>; (iv) is an important deterrent and denouncement by society; and (v) incapacitates offenders<br />

by keeping them off the streets. On the other side, it was argued that mandatory sentencing: (i) strips<br />

judges of discreti<strong>on</strong> in sentencing; (ii) risks turning Canadian pris<strong>on</strong>s into “US-style inmate warehouses”;<br />

(iii) draws funds away from social programmes; and (iv) has not proven to be an effective deterrent. 315<br />

C<strong>on</strong>cerns have also arisen that this sentencing regime will impact most heavily <strong>on</strong> marginalised groups<br />

(particularly aboriginal people) who are already disproporti<strong>on</strong>ately represented in the Canadian pris<strong>on</strong><br />

system. 316<br />

(ii)<br />

Firearms Offences<br />

4.148 The Canadian Criminal Code prescribes mandatory minimum sentences for certain offences<br />

involving firearms and/or other weap<strong>on</strong>s.<br />

4.149 First, the following offences attract a minimum <strong>on</strong>e-year sentence: (i) using a firearm in the<br />

commissi<strong>on</strong> of an offence; 317 (ii) using an imitati<strong>on</strong> firearm in the commissi<strong>on</strong> of an offence; 318 (iii)<br />

310<br />

311<br />

312<br />

313<br />

314<br />

315<br />

316<br />

317<br />

Secti<strong>on</strong> 7(1) of the C<strong>on</strong>trolled Drugs and Substances Act.<br />

Secti<strong>on</strong> 7(a.1)(i) of the C<strong>on</strong>trolled Drugs and Substances Act, inserted by secti<strong>on</strong> 41 of the Safe Streets and<br />

Communities Act.<br />

Secti<strong>on</strong> 7(a.1)(ii) of the C<strong>on</strong>trolled Drugs and Substances Act, inserted by secti<strong>on</strong> 41 of the Safe Streets and<br />

Communities Act.<br />

Secti<strong>on</strong> 7(2)(b) of the C<strong>on</strong>trolled Drugs and Substances Act, inserted by secti<strong>on</strong> 41 of the Safe Streets and<br />

Communities Act.<br />

Dupuis Legislative Summary of Bill S-10: An Act to Amend the C<strong>on</strong>trolled Drugs and Substances Act and to<br />

make related and c<strong>on</strong>sequential Amendments to other Acts (Parliament, No 40-3-S10E, 2010) at 15.<br />

Available at:<br />

www.parl.gc.ca/About/Parliament/LegislativeSummaries/bills_ls.aspls=s10&source=library_prb&Parl=40&Se<br />

s=3&Language=E#fn20. [Last accessed: 22 May 2013].<br />

See also: McLemore “Why Canada should reject the Bill S-10” (Human Rights Watch, 2011).<br />

Bernstein and Drake “In Canada’s ‘war <strong>on</strong> drugs,’ aboriginals are the biggest victims” Nati<strong>on</strong>al Post 6<br />

November 2012; Everett-Green “<strong>Law</strong> and Disorder: What Bill C-10 could mean for Canada’s native people”<br />

The Globe and Mail 17 February 2012; and Sewrattan “Apples, Oranges and Steel: The Effect of <strong>Mandatory</strong><br />

Minimum <strong>Sentences</strong> for Drug Offences <strong>on</strong> the Equality Rights of Aboriginal Peoples” (2013) 46(1) UBC <strong>Law</strong><br />

Review 121.<br />

Secti<strong>on</strong> 85(1) and Secti<strong>on</strong> 86(3)(a) of the Criminal Code.<br />

162

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!