04.02.2015 Views

Report on Mandatory Sentences - Law Reform Commission

Report on Mandatory Sentences - Law Reform Commission

Report on Mandatory Sentences - Law Reform Commission

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

not been for the murder of Polly Klass in 1993 by an offender who had an extensive prior record of<br />

violence. 423 The public outcry that followed the event galvanized the Reynolds campaign.<br />

2.179 In November 1994, voters in Georgia passed a ballot measure amending the state’s sentencing<br />

laws to prescribe a mandatory life sentence without parole for a sec<strong>on</strong>d c<strong>on</strong>victi<strong>on</strong> of an offence specified<br />

in the measure. 424 The law supplemented an existing law which permitted the courts to impose the<br />

maximum sentence for a sec<strong>on</strong>d fel<strong>on</strong>y c<strong>on</strong>victi<strong>on</strong> and required the courts to impose the maximum<br />

sentence for a fourth fel<strong>on</strong>y c<strong>on</strong>victi<strong>on</strong>.<br />

2.180 By 1997, 24 states and the Federal government had enacted three-strikes legislati<strong>on</strong>. 425<br />

(2) England and Wales<br />

2.181 It was not until transportati<strong>on</strong> was abolished in 1857 that recidivism arose as a significant issue<br />

for legislative c<strong>on</strong>siderati<strong>on</strong> in the United Kingdom. 426 In 1863 the Royal Commissi<strong>on</strong> <strong>on</strong> Penal Servitude<br />

c<strong>on</strong>cluded that impris<strong>on</strong>ment was not a sufficient deterrent. 427 The reas<strong>on</strong> for this, it asserted, was that<br />

the minimum term of three years’ penal servitude, which had replaced the minimum term of 7 years for<br />

transportati<strong>on</strong>, 428 was too short. This led to the enactment of the Penal Servitude Act 1864 which made<br />

five years the new minimum for penal servitude and, under pressure, the Government made 7 years’<br />

penal servitude the minimum term for any<strong>on</strong>e with a previous fel<strong>on</strong>y c<strong>on</strong>victi<strong>on</strong>. 429 The 1864 Act was<br />

criticised as the mandatory minimum terms <strong>on</strong>ly applied to those sentenced to penal servitude. 430 If the<br />

courts c<strong>on</strong>sidered it to be too severe a punishment, they were free to impose a sentence of ordinary<br />

impris<strong>on</strong>ment, the maximum term of which was two years. Given the enormous gap between the two<br />

alternatives, the result was widespread disparity in sentencing by different courts. In 1879 the minimum<br />

sentence of 7 years’ penal servitude for a sec<strong>on</strong>d fel<strong>on</strong>y c<strong>on</strong>victi<strong>on</strong> was repealed. 431<br />

2.182 In an effort to resp<strong>on</strong>d to this loophole, the Habitual Criminals Act 1869 was enacted. 432 The Bill<br />

initially included a clause making 7 years’ penal servitude mandatory <strong>on</strong> a third fel<strong>on</strong>y c<strong>on</strong>victi<strong>on</strong>. 433 This<br />

was withdrawn when it was c<strong>on</strong>ceded that designating the number of c<strong>on</strong>victi<strong>on</strong>s as the factor which<br />

triggered the mandatory sentence could lead to great hardship. Instead, the 1869 Act provided that all<br />

those c<strong>on</strong>victed for a sec<strong>on</strong>d time of a fel<strong>on</strong>y or certain misdemeanours be subject to police supervisi<strong>on</strong><br />

for 7 years after they had served their sentences. It further provided that those subject to such<br />

423<br />

424<br />

425<br />

426<br />

427<br />

428<br />

429<br />

430<br />

431<br />

432<br />

433<br />

Vitiello “Three Strikes: Can We Return to Rati<strong>on</strong>ality” (1996-1997) 87 J Crim L & Criminology 395 at 411;<br />

Zimring et al Punishment and Democracy - Three Strikes and You’re Out in California (Oxford University<br />

Press, 2001) at 5; and Austin et al “Three Strikes and You’re Out: The Implementati<strong>on</strong> and Impart of Strike<br />

<strong>Law</strong>s” (US Department of Justice, 2000) at 1.<br />

The offences included murder, armed robbery, kidnapping, rape, aggravated child molestati<strong>on</strong>, aggravated<br />

sodomy and aggravated sexual battery.<br />

Austin et al “Three Strikes and You’re Out: The Implementati<strong>on</strong> and Impart of Strike <strong>Law</strong>s” (US Department of<br />

Justice, 2000) at 1.<br />

Secti<strong>on</strong> 2 of the Penal Servitude Act 1857. Radzinowicz and Hood “Incapacitating the Habitual Offender: The<br />

English Experience” (1979-1980) 78 Mich L Rev 1305 at 1308.<br />

Radzinowicz and Hood “Incapacitating the Habitual Offender: The English Experience” (1979-1980) 78 Mich L<br />

Rev 1305 at 1333.<br />

Secti<strong>on</strong> 2 of the Penal Servitude Act 1857.<br />

Radzinowicz and Hood “Incapacitating the Habitual Offender: The English Experience” (1979-1980) 78 Mich L<br />

Rev 1305 at 1334.<br />

Ibid.<br />

Preventi<strong>on</strong> of Crimes Act 1879.<br />

Radzinowicz and Hood “Incapacitating the Habitual Offender: The English Experience” (1979-1980) 78 Mich L<br />

Rev 1305 at 1334.<br />

Ibid at 1335.<br />

91

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!