Report on Mandatory Sentences - Law Reform Commission
Report on Mandatory Sentences - Law Reform Commission
Report on Mandatory Sentences - Law Reform Commission
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
the perpetrator has a previous c<strong>on</strong>victi<strong>on</strong> for <strong>on</strong>e of the most serious offences in the criminal calendar,<br />
such as murder, attempted murder, rape, child molestati<strong>on</strong> or a fel<strong>on</strong>y involving the use of a firearm. 85<br />
5.48 Under the Californian ‘three-strikes’ regime, probati<strong>on</strong> may not be granted for the current<br />
offence, nor may executi<strong>on</strong> or impositi<strong>on</strong> of the sentence be suspended for any prior offence. 86 Diversi<strong>on</strong><br />
may not be granted to an offender sentenced under this regime nor will he or she be eligible for<br />
commitment to the California Rehabilitati<strong>on</strong> Centre. 87<br />
5.49 Secti<strong>on</strong> 667(f)(2) provides that a prosecuting attorney may move to dismiss an allegati<strong>on</strong> of a<br />
prior c<strong>on</strong>victi<strong>on</strong> for a strike offence in the furtherance of justice or if there is insufficient evidence to prove<br />
the prior c<strong>on</strong>victi<strong>on</strong>. If the court is satisfied that there is insufficient evidence to prove the prior c<strong>on</strong>victi<strong>on</strong>,<br />
it may dismiss or strike the allegati<strong>on</strong>. Secti<strong>on</strong> 667(g) aims to limit the discreti<strong>on</strong> of system officials by<br />
prohibiting the use of prior fel<strong>on</strong>y c<strong>on</strong>victi<strong>on</strong>s in plea bargaining.<br />
5.50 While the Californian ‘three-strikes’ regime has been eased to some extent by the approval of<br />
Propositi<strong>on</strong> 36, the greatly enhanced penalties imposed <strong>on</strong> sec<strong>on</strong>d-strike and third-strike offenders<br />
c<strong>on</strong>tinue to render this law severe. The California State Auditor has estimated that those impris<strong>on</strong>ed<br />
under this regime serve sentences which, <strong>on</strong> average, are nine years l<strong>on</strong>ger due to the requirements of<br />
the law. 88 Accordingly, certain commentators identify this sentencing scheme as a key c<strong>on</strong>tributor to the<br />
well-documented problem of overcrowding in Californian pris<strong>on</strong>s. 89 It is notable that, as of April 2009,<br />
pris<strong>on</strong>ers serving sentences under this regime comprised approximately 25% of the total inmate<br />
populati<strong>on</strong> in Californian penal instituti<strong>on</strong>s. 90<br />
5.51 In additi<strong>on</strong> to these ‘three-strikes’ provisi<strong>on</strong>s, secti<strong>on</strong> 667.7 of the Penal Code imposes a<br />
mandatory sentencing regime <strong>on</strong> “habitual offenders”. Under this regime, a “habitual offender” is defined<br />
as any pers<strong>on</strong> c<strong>on</strong>victed of a fel<strong>on</strong>y in which he or she inflicted great bodily injury <strong>on</strong> another pers<strong>on</strong>, or<br />
pers<strong>on</strong>ally used force which was likely to inflict great bodily injury, and who has previously served two or<br />
more pris<strong>on</strong> terms for a specified offence. 91 A habitual offender who has served two prior pris<strong>on</strong> terms<br />
will receive a life sentence for the current offence and, at a minimum, will not be eligible for parole until 20<br />
years have been served. A habitual offender who has served three or more prior pris<strong>on</strong> terms will receive<br />
a sentence of life impris<strong>on</strong>ment without parole.<br />
5.52 Secti<strong>on</strong> 667.71 of the Penal Code establishes a mandatory sentencing regime for habitual<br />
sexual offenders. A habitual sexual offender is defined as a pers<strong>on</strong> who has previously been c<strong>on</strong>victed of<br />
85<br />
86<br />
87<br />
88<br />
89<br />
90<br />
91<br />
Secti<strong>on</strong> 667(e)(C) of the Penal Code.<br />
Secti<strong>on</strong> 667(c) of the Penal Code.<br />
Secti<strong>on</strong> 667(c) of the Penal Code.<br />
California Department of Correcti<strong>on</strong>s and Rehabilitati<strong>on</strong>: Inmates Sentenced under the Three Strikes <strong>Law</strong> and<br />
a Small Number of Inmates Receiving Specialty Health Care Represent Significant Costs (California State<br />
Auditor, 2010) at 27.<br />
See, for example: Grosskreutz “Strike Three: Even Though California’s Three Strikes <strong>Law</strong> Strikes out<br />
Andrade, There are no Winners in this Game” (2003-2004) 43 Washburn <strong>Law</strong> Journal 429 at 454-455; and<br />
California Department of Correcti<strong>on</strong>s and Rehabilitati<strong>on</strong>: Inmates Sentenced under the Three Strikes <strong>Law</strong> and<br />
a Small Number of Inmates Receiving Specialty Health Care Represent Significant Costs (California State<br />
Auditor, 2010) at 30.<br />
California Department of Correcti<strong>on</strong>s and Rehabilitati<strong>on</strong>: Inmates Sentenced under the Three Strikes <strong>Law</strong> and<br />
a Small Number of Inmates Receiving Specialty Health Care Represent Significant Costs (California State<br />
Auditor, 2010) at 21.<br />
Secti<strong>on</strong> 667.7(a) lists at least 20 offences which may trigger this regime. These include: various homicide<br />
offences (including murder and manslaughter); sexual offences (including various forms of rape); assault<br />
offences (including assault with intent to commit murder and assault with a deadly weap<strong>on</strong>); and violent<br />
property offences (including robbery involving the use of force or a deadly weap<strong>on</strong> and carjacking involving<br />
the use of a deadly weap<strong>on</strong>).<br />
196